“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
ENTj. Look at it, that watch knows everything and it's going to tell you about it too. And you know what else it's going to do? tell you why/how it knows everything.
Easy Day
I say Si dominant. That watch is prepared to handle any situation with overkill.
It's a Te watch poorly matched with the ring .Nothing Si about it.
Apparently, this girl does not actually own it and just wanted to take a picture wearing a rolex before she dies.Ιf,at the same time, she's admiring the delicateness of her wrist compared to the watch she's prolly EII.
Parkster,
Here is my vote for the best watch (Advice from SiTe).
Casio Wavecepter, Atomic, Solar.
The price is reasonable, and because it self-corrects by receiving a signal from the Atomic Clock each night, you never have to worry that it's off. It's solar, so there are no batteries.
Imagine a watch that is never wrong, and won't stop for lack of winding or power. The first ever, can't miss watch. $75 - $300.
ISTp
SLI
Enneagram 5 with a side of wings.
According to my calculations:
Leading (The overall big black dominating circular Se background)
DS (The fews placements of Ni in a zenith positioning and around 8 o'clock)
Ignoring (The multiple little white Si circles within and inside Se)
PoLR (The absence of white little Ti boxes)
Conclusion:
ESFp
Amazon.com: Rolex Oyster Perpetual Sea-Dweller DEEPSEA Mens Watch 116660-BKSO: Rolex: Watches
Is that girl a professional diver?
I've been looking for a decent watch and that's one of the options that I've been considering. The problem is that the most affordable models (60-100 $) are made of resin and not stainless steel, and for ~50 bucks more you can have a citizen eco-drive or a seiko kinetic.
I can't really be bothered to buy battery-powered watches anymore given the other options that are available (solar powered, mechanical, kinetic). I've had 2 watches broken because I went swimming with them after replacing the battery and the water protection had gone away, not to mention too that it is simply annoying having to change the battery every 2 years or so.
Other options I've been considering are:
Orient diver watches are a bargain for the price; their automatic movements (made by Orient themselves) are very accurate (gain only around 2 sec a day-- this is great for an automatic watch), and have a very solid contruction. Around 150$ and you are getting quality well beyond what you are paying.
Vostok Amphibia watches (russian brand). These watches are like a brick and they sport very decent automatic movements. However, they're a bit hard to come across. ~60$
Invicta divers, but I tend to dislike this brand. I think it has to do with their logo that reminds me of nazi memorabilia. You also have to be somewhat lucky and get a decent timepiece because their quality control is not very good. ~100$
Overall structured feel. Emphasis on measurements (rotating bezel):
It's a watch, you know, to measure time. Doesn't sport numbers in the face, so it prefers to leave some things implied:
Lack of superflous adornments, doesn't look too comfortable: porl
However, looks quite sturdy and likely to not falter in the most extreme environments. It's a diver's watch (extreme sport): Ha
@Cyrano: Thanks! I've been actually looking for a watch for myself since my Swiss Swatch broke last month. The Casio looks good and prices seem quite reasonable. I'll have a look at the choices and maybe decide to purchase one.
@Lav: BullzEye. Thanks for your info.
Last edited by Park; 07-24-2010 at 07:10 PM.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
The watch is EIE, the hand is SLI, and the ring is LSE.
How about this one:
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
Oh shit, I can't V.I this one.
lol It's on the hands of an Ne girl, so I would say SLI
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
How about this:
Any thoughts ?