Removed at User Request
Did it ever occur to you that there might have been such human beings that never existed whatsoever like my imaginary friend Ted who if he existed would work as a salesman in Minnesota selling furniture at discount prices like a five-person couch with inset for only $599.99 or a mahogany desk drawer 24'' by 16'' surface with three large cabinets and ample legroom for only $419.99 call 1-877-983-0313 now or come to Ted's Discount Furniture but hurry because these prices end soon!
Well, this all goes into my philosophical outlook on socionics, but basically, I'm just saying that socionics, while it is pretty darn accurate, isn't going to fit the world perfectly, isn't going to fit reality perfectly, and if there's any case extraordinary enough to make socionics so inaccurate as to be irrelevant, it's Jesus Christ.
I think there's a part of the bible where Paul says, "I became all things to all people that some might be saved," and it think that that line of reasoning applies somewhat to socionics. In theory at least (and again, I think that socionics just becomes stupid/irrelevant when you try to analyze the Gospel in terms of socionics), Jesus would be capable of altering His interaction style as needed to achieve His goal, whatever that may be. Also, I believe that at the highest levels of human development (and Christ was a Second Adam, representing not only deity and humanity, but also humanity in its highest form, that is, the untainted and undiluted Image of God as expressed in Adam before the Fall), socionics type becomes irrelevant, that when you are fully human you become type-transcendent or your core of cognition is so different from what Carl Jung was capable of understanding (and Jung remains to this day the most intelligent and magnanimous---in the Greek sense---practitioner of socionics) that his system breaks down and we need another set of tools or labels for describing how that level of cognition works. As Harold Bloom would say, it is a difference in degree so great as to become a difference in kind. It is a larger example of the literary critical phenomenon wherein the language we use very effectively to describe and analyze, say, Toni Morrison's Beloved, becomes hopelessly ineffective and insufficient for describing the core of what, say, Hamlet does or Antony and Cleopatra does.
Not a rule, just a trend.
IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.
Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...
I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.
random rant about whole Christianity ish:
why the fuck did the all loving God wanted to destroy everything like 4000-3000 yrs ago, and for the sake of not being all lonely, since other gods didn't like him, he told some guy to put two of every specie on the boat and so those ones were saved, lol. so like, wtf? and how does this go with history? sane mind of the believer? it's like some funny mystical shit, that those ones believing reads or talks about, then get their body goose bumps'ed and they are like - yeah the lord is great!
I don't know if I like anything about my dual. It's not about liking. It's what happens between us. It's more about "we" and less about you and I.
I think every ILE is endearingly silly in their own way (in the sense that, of the three ILEs I'm thinking of, each is rather silly in a way that's basically unique to each of them), and I definitely like this a lot. They also always manage to be magically profoundly interesting, and make me feel like I'm a reasonably intelligent and insightful person too, in my own right
The ILE is also well equipped to calm my poor Ni Role down when it gets hopelessly lost and anxious about The Future, and this is always an appreciated service when needed
I guess they just generally make my life more interesting, even if they can make me feel incredibly old in comparison (which is a good thing... it's a peaceful feeling to have).
Because Si base is the "you're a grandma/grandpa in a young person's body" stamp of the Socion![]()
Heh, well, I guess I should clarify, it's something for me that pops up in a very particular sort of Caregiver/Infantile relationship. When I see a certain ILE being very silly and very dear, I definitely feel... well, like a Caregiver with an Infantile![]()
Ok so here's the flash of insight i just had:
Deltas are the grandma/grandpa's of the socion but as old people (in the psyche sense), they want to feel young and think of themselves as young.
Alphas are the kids of the socion, and as children (in the psyche sense), they want to feel older and feel more "grown-up" like kids tend to want.
Eureka, I guess that explains it!!![]()
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
I like the feeling of joy I get when I'm around them. They are hilarious, full of energy and make me giggle like a 12 year old.