Quote Originally Posted by Expat View Post
I see PoLR when people say one thing now, then something that logically contradicts it some time later, and then get upset if you say, "but what you said just contradicts what you just said five minutes before".
This is a great example of Ti-PoLR.


Quote Originally Posted by Expat View Post
ENFp is very inconsistent in the acts and reasonings. Listening to explanations, easily seizes the general, frequently only superficial sense. Sometimes at ENFp there is an insuperable interest to the analysis of insignificant particulars (and these particulars seem to him supersignificant and necessary for deep and momentary understanding of an essence).

Intuitively comprehending sense of many logic concepts and categories, ENFp often has about them superficial enough representation. Therefore sometimes puts himself in awkward position, stating obviously absurd things most self-assured tone.

Often tests difficulty in an explanation of any elementary concepts. But even more is at a loss to explain the complex phenomenon simple means.

sometimes ENFp begins the explanation too in detail and in details, but subsequently he loses in it interest

ENFp painfully perceive any accusation of illogicality and inconsistency. Take offence, when criticize their mental faculties. Often express in the form of sayings. Some of representatives of this type like to write down the sayings in a writing-book, to quote to their associates and to publish in the newspaper.
Most of this is pretty accurate. The two bolded sentences are ones I highly identify with. I absolutely hate being called stupid or any variant thereof, and oftentimes instead of attempting to express a viewpoint in my own words, I'll quote someone else ("Spinoza said this", "according to Wittgenstein, this", etc).


Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan View Post
I think a better definition to use (and let's be realistic: We're simply deciding to use definitions for things; there is nothing intrinsic...it's a matter of choice) for Te is that it's the dynamic and extraverted aspect of thinking.

That is, Ti and Te are basically the same thing, but Ti is static (about a fixed timeless reality) and more concerned with the extent of systems and how everything relates, whereas Te is dynamic (about a progression, such a series of steps, ways to accomplish something, for example) and tends to relate more immediately to the specific external objects under discussion.
This is excellent.


Quote Originally Posted by Crispy View Post
All this talk about being anything about "the rules" is sickening (although I guess LSI's would prefer it to "laws").

Fully differentiated Filatova -PoLR Quotes: (May decide to revamp the other PoLR threads in the future)

IEE

Weak in administrative functions such as organization of work schedules, writing instructions, reports and the like.

Have trouble restraining themselves to certain boundaries.

Does not accept anything predetermined.

Difficulty in logical analysis.

Cannot sit and meticulously do what is necessary, instead preferring to bounce a multitude of ideas off those around them.

Inability to analyze things deeply

Pay attention to the many minute details while failing to grasp the big picture
YES! If you seek an adequate understanding of Ti-PoLR, look no further.