Originally Posted by
VixenDogFox
I do read, constantly. I would never ask you questions however because (your) pompous behavior is a major turnoff to me.
Your reply here is basically Fe. ^^^That is Fe. ISTp has Fe polr. You are not ISTp. Understand?
You don't know the slightest thing about functions.
Not really. That is why I picked about four other types to "be" before I came back to the beginning.
Well I'm talking about right now. At this point you like the idea you're ISTp and you've become very buttheaded. Not talking about whatever you thought last year or even a month ago. Completely irrelevant.
Interestingly this is subjective as type relations dictate the way a type is perceived. I'm not that interested in whether you think I am logical. I know I am not SF now though. Of that I am certain.
Oh no, it's not subjective. ESFjs will ramble on and on, clueless as hell.
Anyway, your certainty is meaningless.
Oh? You mean the way you undoubtedly do in a vast many aspects of your life you aren't even aware of. Give me a break.
Yeah, see this again illustrates why I don't talk to you regarding the theory in detail. You're telling me I'm not aware enough of who you are as a person to be able to type you, and only you can really do that. Well if that's the case then we can close this fucking thread, and you can be confident in your self typing on your own.
To that dismissive and insulting comment I can only roll my eyes and grimace.
The natural response of a person with such dominant Fe.
Wow, you must be really smart. *bats eyes dramatically* You can even use the word "exacerbate" [though incorrectly]!!!
Wow, that's alot of Fe!
But lol - that word wasn't used incorrectly, dumbass. Here's the definition:
Main Entry: ex·ac·er·bate
Function: transitive verb
Etymology: Latin exacerbatus, past participle of exacerbare, from ex- + acerbus harsh, bitter, from acer sharp — more at edge
: to make more violent, bitter, or severe <the proposed shutdown…would exacerbate
So the sentence ''exacerbate on your assertions'' is telling you to make your argument 'more sharp, at edge'. It's a perfect metaphor which is apparently over your head.
Gosh, I'd better listen to you! I'd better ask pompous windbags like you to explain themselves because I REALLY CARE.
*gag*
Once again this is pure Fe.
I never asked to learn in this thread
Actually you just asked me why I didn't explain things to newcomers, and this was an explicit response to that question. So yeah, you did ask to learn.
, I wanted to announce my new typing. People can comment as they wish. I did not invite them to explain anything to me.
Yeah you did.
Get over yourself Crazed, you are not as smart as you believe yourself to be.
Yes I am.
Subjective and one-sided...
Yeah, well something being subjective doesn't make it untrue. And at what point does most of the forums subjectivity translate into something resembling objectivity? Anyway, I have the experience to back up that subjectivity.
That assumption is retarded. I most certainly did not decide to be SLI because I changed my boyfriend's type. It happened naturally. Once I believed his type to be different, I did question my own, but did not immediately move to SLI.
Okay so you you first dismiss his type change had any impact, but then come around to acknowledge it caused you to question your own type? Nice contradiction.
I decided to reconsider several people's types (as I do often when I learn something new about socionics and feel I have gained a small bit of new understanding). But I don't need to explain myself to you.
I DON'T CARE IF I AM HIS DUAL, I have already said. AND, SLI is my original typing years ago. Ugh.
Well honestly that's just the best explanation I could come up with for this completely baseless self typing of yours. I could be wrong about it - this could all just be some random inspiration you've had. That's actually more pathetic in my eyes.. But it really doesn't matter why you're doing this. I mean, I was venturing a guess, but it's mostly irrelevant.