-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
She had absolutely nothing to do with me making my post, I made it, with no input from her at all. It doesn't matter what behavior you don't like, I just pointed out that the behavior that YOU are taking part in, is not healthy, totally mean, obsessive, and just plain rediculous. with that said, the best course of action that I suggest would be to "let it go, get over it."
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
There is nothing about her that would want to be anything like you, don't inflate your ego that much. I assure you, the world would be a better place with less people like you and more like her.
She has you on ignore and can't even read your words...lol. So ummmm... yeah.![]()
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Oh well, the only thing left to do is to move forward. So, they said, the truth will uncover itself, so why try? Right?
I'm going to leave my ideals of this situation behind, it's the executioner's block...
So, I've made a decision...I'm not going to pursue this point any more.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Really, I don't care about your typing of her, just your obsession with her. A search for the word "minde" and your username comes up with 250+ posts. Seriously, whether or not she's an EII to you isn't my concern... and really, there's nobody on the forum who EVERYONE considers one cetain type without question... that would be a rediculous thing to ask due to the nature of socionics and how differently people of different types understand it.
Why not let other people fiddle around with Minde's type (or better yet, let her go on with her self typing), instead of giving every reason YOU can think of why she doesn't "fit the mold" of the typical EII, in your mind. Does it really need to be your mission in life to type her correctly? No, I'd hope not... for your sake and hers.
Even after you've said you'll leave it alone you still went back and edited your post...I'm sure I'll look back and laugh at this thread at some point, but I hope you prove my intuition wrong.
Removed at User Request
Come on people, what has gotten into you? Minde is Fi as one can be. And intuitive (anyone saw her on Intuition rampage in Airborne's VI me thread? It was like, wow man, just wow!!!).
Maritsa, she is not copying your words, and this is sounding a lot like a paranoid delusion. You need to relax and stop making assumptions into people's motivations. You've copied off all of Minde's posts? That scares me from a standpoint of worrying about your mental health. I really think you need to take a break from here. Not because of any negative feelings I might have about you, but because you are having real emotional problems. I'm starting to get really worried about you.
Pinnochio, you're wrong about that being Fe.
Ad hominen arguments make you look smart and wise, and always help demonstrate the correctness of your positions.
As usual, you dramatically overstate your case in unnecessarily black-and-white terms. SLI and LSE are not incapable of talking about how they appreciate the beauty of nature, especially if they're female (as women in our culture can talk about such things without the risk of appearing "unmanly"). However, you're right to say that there's a strong ethical component to that sort of description -- you rarely see Alpha NTs, especially LIIs, talking like that either, despite having both Si and Fe in valued functions. But like I said, I'm of the opinion that the ethics expressed by Minde in that post are more closely related to Fi than Fe.
Fi: "I like this sunset."
Fe: "This sunset makes me happy."
Obviously, ethical types have strong ethics of both kinds, and ethical language can be imprecise as to which kind of ethics is being described, but that's the core of it there.
Quaero Veritas.
I agree with Mariella. Many parts pointed out asI totally relate to, especially about nursing, liking/disliking people and how Minde describes that she acts based on it. It is no evidence for
.
I rather think wikisocion is accurate when it says-
Minde's descriptions are rather on the subjective side of things, accentuated by a lot of "I love it" and "I like it", underlining this very subjectivity of perception, as well as "I see", "I look at it". The excitement of SEI over aesthetics tend to be in line with "that's amazing!", "isn't it wondeful", "it's just so awesome", "it was gorgeous", etc., followed by a graphic description as well - and I often heard it in reference to nature. WithAlso, these [] types convey emotions in terms of how they were affected by something (such as "I did not like that"), rather than an extroverted ethics (
) approach that would describe the object itself without clear reference to the subject involved (such as "That sucked"). Much of their decisions are based on how they themselves, or others in relation to them personally, feel in contrast to considering how "the big picture" is affected (such as groups of people.)
-ego, there tends to be an underlying expectation that these subjective perceptions are shared with others.
Removed at User Request
Seeing people as enemies? Fi? Wtf?
That's it. I'm joining labcoat. Your recent efforts to divorce me from him had just failed. Just so you know.
Removed at User Request
When I say I think wikisocion is accurate in a particular case, it means it agrees with my view of the matter. Not that it's the Bible or whatever you like to call it, though of course you're free to do so.
Exactly what you quoted yourself relates to it in the way that Fe egos want objectivity. It doesn't mean that their perceptions, likes or dislikes are any less strong, but they are expected to be universal. This is the difference, not the strength of opinion - in fact they might be louder and more opinionated about it specifically because of this. Fe-leading may even go as far as to discuss their tastes to achieve a consensus (!), considering the opinion all the stronger for it being shared. Fi, on the other hand, is aware of its own subjectivity of perception, inclined to agree to disagree about taste, assuming others' perceptions to be equally subjective - they'd rather not form bonds with people they have little in common with, though.
Removed at User Request
Removed at User Request
Ah yes, you're right, that is a more typical way for an Fe-Ego to phrase things. I suppose I'm viewing it from the perspective of Base-Ti, and the desire to analyze and categorize everything ("What emotion is this? It is pleasant... energizing... I believe I am feeling 'happiness'!"). An Fe-Ego would be more "in the moment", reacting directly to whatever it was that inspired the emotions, as you and Wikisocion describe, rather than stopping to analyze and state which emotion is being felt (although that's not to say that they would be incapable of describing their emotions).
With that in mind, here's an edited version of Minde's description of our beautiful world, as an Alpha SF might phrase it:
Although it's substantially the same, the difference in tone is quite noticeable.Originally Posted by Hypothetical Alpha SF
Also, on the question of "enemies" -- it's Gamma SF that's focused on guarding against enemies, Delta NF is more interested in making friends. Call it "Fi blocked with Se/Fi blocked with Ne" or "minus Fi/plus Fi", but that's one of the biggest differences in how the two Quadras use Fi.
Quaero Veritas.
lol. Yah, there was a time that only a select few understood the principles of photography enough, and afford the equipment to produce great photos. That was enough to afford them the opportunity to boast. Nowadays, anyone with a half decent $100 point and shoot digital has the potential produce good pics. I'd hardly call it snobbish a interest at this point.
In favor of Minde as INFj, as I think arguments should be fair, we make wonderful artists.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html