The question is what do you do when etiquette in a formal situation, like a party, calls you to not laugh, joke, fun or make fun?
If you went to a party and it was not polite to joke around what would you do?
The question is what do you do when etiquette in a formal situation, like a party, calls you to not laugh, joke, fun or make fun?
If you went to a party and it was not polite to joke around what would you do?
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 04-23-2010 at 06:58 PM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
It depends on the context. I am not sure if I understand what you are asking. Do you have a particular scenario in mind? Sometimes the etiquette is reasonable and other times it is quite absurd in itself. It depends on the reason.
ETA: I cannot believe I'm agreeing with Pinocchio.
Johari Box"Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
I ignore it. I am a huge joker by nature. I would prefer to have fun than follow some archaic rulez.
D-SEI 9w1
This is me and my dual being scientific together
I wouldn't go. Formal events are stupid.
The saddest ESFj
...
I think I know where you're getting at.
I'll say this: I tend avoid situations where I have to "act" a "part" in anyway, shape, or form. I rather be. If I absolutely have to be in a situation where there is unwritten, or written rule for doing things—for whatever reason—I probably (it depends) will stay quiet and be polite (hoping somebody will slip over a banana peal) 'til I get to back home (or a friends house) and eat Cheetos Flamin' Hot chips... with my blazer on.
Do speeches count with your question?
I had fun with the "rules" by breaking them in front of my professor in my speech class last year. I was swearing like hell, that relaxed the entire class though. The professor gave me a big fat warning, but that was fun; not just for me, but my audience too. Ironically, another professor of mine saw my main point for doing so and praised it instead.
Fuck! that was cool.
I don't really understand the question because I don't need to joke all the time. Etiquette is usually not a problem for me. I automatically go with the flow and melt into the situation, whatever it is. Formal situations can actually be quite fun to be in. The only thing that can be a problem is when somebody starts to give me direct orders on how to behave. I take that as an insult because I perfectly trust my ability to adapt to the situation without a manual.
My ESI mother once gave me a handbook on etiquette. I'm surprised she thought I would need it because people always tell me I'm very polite, maybe not polite in a formal way, but still.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Johari Box"Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Being there simply by the virtue of being invited is not a reason to be there. So why am I there? What is the occasion?
But I do not think that there would ever be a situation in which someone would feel the need to warn me not to be flamboyant. It's just not generally in my nature to be flamboyant, as my natural inclination is to blend in, not be noticed, or placed in the spotlight.
Johari Box"Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
Frankly an invitation like that (specifically asking people not to be flamboyant or joke around) would be quite rude, and a breach of etiquette in and of itself. Proper etiquette never draws attention to other people's breaches of etiquette. (Note that by pointing this out, I am breaching formal etiquette myself. )
A polite invitation might mention something about it being a "formal" party, or a "black-tie event", but the details of how to behave would be left unspoken (unless asked).
Quaero Veritas.
The point that I was trying to demonstrate here is that ILE and ESE will joke or try to "push the envelope" to make humor in a situation where they are expected by social ettiquette to not, and SEI and LII will not joke in the same situation; by this point, Rubicon, I think that your behavior is not of SEI and closer to ESE and ILE, but I don't see any Ne in you so I would go with ESE, by process of elimination.
There are lot's of other reason's why I eliminated LII and also ILE but that's for another time.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
almost right. i think ILE would push the envelope and ESE would kinda think it was funny and would try to figure out how to fold ILE jokes into the general atmosphere. ESE would "help" ILE this way. if ILE went to far, though, ESE would kinda distract ILE, maybe maneuver ILE to a different room or something. all very nicely though. since they get along so well.
ILE
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
Johari Box"Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
My mood varies a lot. I am the slave of my mood. Sometimes I am bored but later I suddenly get in the mood and start partying. I like it if there is a possibility to dance, because then I can flirt with girls without having to involve in serious discussions (And I usually don't have that much to say). Is dancing about Si? I guess I use Si when I dance. I love to dance.
I love parties, I usually stay late, hoping that there still will be some fun in store for me.
wiggle some jokes out until people started breaking the social norm and laughing
ILE
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
This wouldn't be considered a party to me. This would be some type of "meeting" instead. My behavior would coincide with what I'd probably be supposed to do, though, asking me to not to be humorous in any way is kinda like tying my hands behind my back and asking me to play baseball. While I don't go out of my way to laugh, joke, or anything else like that... It's a rather large part of who I am.
I think the question Maritsa is really trying to ask is: What would you do if you found yourself at a party hosted and attended primarily by Gamma Rationals.
Quaero Veritas.
exactly.
definitely. the most they would do is as i wrote above. ^I think that ESEs are far more tactful in formal social situations than you give them credit, because they may not want to disrupt a given emotional atmosphere, even if it discomforts them. Frequently for ESE, the needs of the many out way the needs of the single ESE.
ILE
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
I don't understand what you're saying here? At my party, I hope there would be lots of laughter and joking, in for fact, that's one of the reasons why I get along with my ESE sister and cousin so well; my dual cousin and I hang out with them regularly for good laughs...they know how to have a good time.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 04-26-2010 at 03:05 AM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Johari Box"Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
nah I don't think ENTjs care about that kind of thing. Actually all democractic extraverts are the "wildest" types, least likely to care about social norms. In fact I think ENTjs descriptions say that ESI check that LIEs jokes are not "out of bounds", or something like that - mostly we ignore those warnings, though - life is too short!
Yeah but that's common among all democratic quadars. ILE-ESE-LIE-SEE are the troublemakers and rule-breakers, SEI-LII-ESI-ILI are the grumbling rule-abiders. Obviously dualized people take up some qualities of their duals so the Es will be less troublemakers and the Is less grumbling, but that's the general nature of these interactions.The point that I was trying to demonstrate here is that ILE and ESE will joke or try to "push the envelope" to make humor in a situation where they are expected by social ettiquette to not, and SEI and LII will not joke in the same situatio
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
.
Last edited by Parasite; 10-29-2010 at 03:20 PM.