Enneatype of Maritsa33

[Ezra]

Yeah, people love the Six wildcard. Maritsa isn't a Six. Two or One I'm happy with. Anything else I'd struggle with.

[silverchris9]

I've always thought of her as a two. No thoughts on wing or instinctual yet.

[Creepy-male]

My guess on the instinctual would be sp/sx/so

She has claimed herself to be very introverted irl. Social subtypes, even the most introverted are constantly building social networks and making connections the way a self-preservation collects and maintains provisions and resources.

That places the so last

She is obsessed with duality, but something doesn't strike me as sx leading. She isn't ultra creative, she never talks about herself in excess, etc... I just don't feel that need from her to display who she is and share that to develop some bond of intimacy.

Instead she strikes me as the typical sp/sx stacking. A sort of dreamy disconnected type, who focuses on issues of preservation/survival/hoarding. They are the proverbial princess in the castle (god I really hate using fairy tales to make a point), they are hoarded away with all their provisions and safety in the "castle", yet secondarily seek intimacy (the prince).

This is her vibe, shes completely obsessed with duality, and completely out of touch with social currents. So sx/sp and sp/sx seem likely, she doesn't have the reckless attitude of the sx/sp, so I'd opt for sp/sx for the above reasons.

[Marie84]

I believe that you and I made an agreement; your emotional display here went against our agreement, hence I will have to say that you are irrational type. Rational types act on rational things, irrational types act on their emotional impulses, which in my rational mind you have done here, now.

I never stated that I would not disagree with your views on Socionics, I said I wouldn't personally insult you. It sounds like you're interpreting me disagreeing with you as an attack on your character, when in fact I was complimenting a positive talent you have that I'm lacking at

You're also free to retype me if you like, a couple other people have done so as well. But keep in mind that I don't see you as someone who has a grasp on Socionics enough to be capable of typing yourself, never mind other people, and I'm sure most everyone on this board agrees with me on that

Every human type has feelings, showing them or not does not determine Fe/Fi or any other type; the differences lie in what prompts emotions to show up, which obviously you have not figured out yet.

It absolutely dose, though.
Read this part on the Base Function, it's spot on:

"Many people also have a tendency to assume that attention to one's base function is something that merely comes naturally to all people, and that "most people are like that."

You're assuming that since you can do this, everyone can, which is far from reality

For Si types, it's not getting certain sensations fulfilled...this is just an example to you and you can figure out the rest on your own.

I have no time for you.

I'm not the one who needs to be my reevaluating my understanding here

[Beautiful sky]

I never stated that I would not disagree with your views on Socionics, I said I wouldn't personally insult you. It sounds like you're interpreting me disagreeing with you as an attack on your character, when in fact I was complimenting a positive talent you have that I'm lacking at

You're also free to retype me if you like, a couple other people have done so as well. But keep in mind that I don't see you as someone who has a grasp on Socionics enough to be capable of typing yourself, never mind other people, and I'm sure most everyone on this board agrees with me on that



It absolutely dose, though.
Read this part on the Base Function, it's spot on:

"Many people also have a tendency to assume that attention to one's base function is something that merely comes naturally to all people, and that "most people are like that."

You're assuming that since you can do this, everyone can, which is far from reality



I'm not the one who needs to be my reevaluating my understanding here

Recall, verbatim, the agreement and write it on here.

[Aiss]

Read this part on the Base Function, it's spot on:

"Many people also have a tendency to assume that attention to one's base function is something that merely comes naturally to all people, and that "most people are like that."

You're assuming that since you can do this, everyone can, which is far from reality.

That's a really good part. I remember saying here that people tend to take their base function for granted a while ago - that sums it up even better.

[discojoe]

She's a 1w2 who hasn't yet learned that people simply won't change just because she wants them to. It's really annoying.

[Beautiful sky]

She's a 1w2 who hasn't yet learned that people simply won't change just because she wants them to. It's really annoying.

No one wants to change you. At least I don't. Now you're a smuck with limited brain capability.

[Airman]

she´s either 1w2 or 2w1, other than these, impossible.

[Beautiful sky]

i'm not a 1w2

[aestrivex]

4w2

[Subteigh]

She's a 1w2 who hasn't yet learned that people simply won't change just because she wants them to. It's really annoying.

No one wants to change you. At least I don't. Now you're a smuck with limited brain capability.

You're so rude, Maritsa.

[Beautiful sky]

No one wants to change you. At least I don't. Now you're a smuck with limited brain capability.

You're so rude, Maritsa.

I'm not laughing at him or mocking him. Those are my personal and subjective guidelines for "rude behavior"

[leckysupport]

You're so rude, Maritsa.

I'm not laughing at him or mocking him. Those are my personal and subjective guidelines for "rude behavior"

Would you consider this the way of the humanist?

[Beautiful sky]

I'm not laughing at him or mocking him. Those are my personal and subjective guidelines for "rude behavior"

Would you consider this the way of the humanist?

Depends on the culture of the individual humanist.