Poll: I and Rocky

[Angel von Himmel]

Are me and rocky same type or members of types who seem alike, but totally misunderstand each other on account of the intertype relationship?

[Joy]

*Are Rocky and I

sorry

[Angel von Himmel]

Despite grammar difficulties:

http://the16types.info/forums/viewto...?p=74924#74924

We do this sort of stuff to each other all the time ... in this instance in the link above I was using Discartes to show how seducing the opposite sex could be knowledge, then Rocky barges in and says I am talking out of my ass when I was really just saying things that should be common knowledge to some degree, and then it just went sour from there.

[Rick]

You probably have a super-ego or conflict relationship. If it was supervision, one of you would feel concerned about not offending the other, and the supervisee would avoid direct confrontation. Considering Rocky's interpretation of , um... well, I don't know, whatever. But I think you're definitely onto somethng socionics related, whatever it is. I think it's safe to say either you are not ILE or Rocky is not SLI. If you were, you would respond to his stubborness by explaining, explaining, and explaining. Maybe you are indeed EIE. I'm beginning to consider it. If so, you're a new version of the type that I'm not familiar with visually. In any event, you seem to take issue with the way he formulates everything.

[Rocky]

ILI-SLI

-

[WVBRY]

Im not sure how the same type could misunderstand each other as much as you seem to be saying you and Rocky do, since intertype relations are supposed to go well between identicals.

[Angel von Himmel]

You probably have a super-ego or conflict relationship. If it was supervision, one of you would feel concerned about not offending the other, and the supervisee would avoid direct confrontation. Considering Rocky's interpretation of , um... well, I don't know, whatever. But I think you're definitely onto somethng socionics related, whatever it is. I think it's safe to say either you are not ILE or Rocky is not SLI. If you were, you would respond to his stubborness by explaining, explaining, and explaining. Maybe you are indeed EIE. I'm beginning to consider it. If so, you're a new version of the type that I'm not familiar with visually. In any event, you seem to take issue with the way he formulates everything.

If you go back to the thread and make note of what occured with my new explanation, rocky again totally the missed the point, accused me of missing the point, and then unintentionally prompted me to reexplain myself. But, I can not reexplain myself without repeating what I have already said, and I am not since that has never worked before previously.

[Park]

ILI-SLI

-

Did you mean IEI-SLI ? Anyhow, after reading some of your discussions I think that's much more likely for you two.

[Catholic Schoolboy]

Nah, rmcnew isn't an IEI. There could also be non-socionic reasons as to why they don't get along.

Such a wise girl.


Not everything is socionics related.

[Angel von Himmel]

Nah, rmcnew isn't an IEI. There could also be non-socionic reasons as to why they don't get along.

Such a wise girl.


Not everything is socionics related.

Hmmmmm .... interesting observation, except that Rocky and I simply miscommunicate from an intellectual level ... others it seems from an ethical level where I am forced to defend my own values. Interesting.