VI me!

[717495]

That Socionics book is a failure. Seems to represent Jungian typology in some regard though, which again, isn't Socionics. 2 stars out of 5. Only person to rate 5 out of 5 was Maritsa. How to Find Yourself and Your Best ... - Google Books

She should probably stop getting all pumped up over positive "you can do it!" mumbo jumbo, and stop regarding her moments of learning this stuff as memories of inspiration and stability. Socionics may not be her thing.

[Creepy-Pied Piper]

Removed at User Request

[717495]

I would have guessed IEI

Hmm, according to these galleries, I say ESI or LII, based off of these pictures:




But I don't think I could ever count on any VI system to type someone. It's overly simplistic/physical. According to those VI galleries, I'm probably LSE. One VI gallery, I think Ashton's, had me at ILE or LII, which fit at the time I was debating between those types, but aside from that I thought it was stupid, how it grouped random celebs and forum users together who did not fit into how the theory was designed. There was no real legitimacy to it. No quadras, just faces and expressions.

Not anything with legs is edible.

Yeah, I agree.

[Quote Unquote]

Eunice, if you notice, many SEI on this forum choose a different sex avatar then the one they are; I am 100% confirming that you are SEI; INFj's would put a picture of themselves as their avatar.

WHAT??? Are you implying that you are the only actual EII in the whole forum???

INFj's would put a picture of themselves as their avatar.

INFj's would put a picture of themselves as their avatar.

INFj's would put a picture of themselves as their avatar.

INFj's would put a picture of themselves as their avatar.

INFj's would put a picture of themselves as their avatar.

INFj's would put a picture of themselves as their avatar.

INFj's would put a picture of themselves as their avatar.

INFj's would put a picture of themselves as their avatar.

INFj's would put a picture of themselves as their avatar.

INFj's would put a picture of themselves as their avatar.

INFj's would put a picture of themselves as their avatar.

INFj's would put a picture of themselves as their avatar.

HOW CAN YOU SAY A SO IMMENSE CRAP LIKE THIS?!?!?!?!?!?!

[Quote Unquote]

Eunice really seems an EII.

[Quote Unquote]

Hmm, according to these galleries, I say ESI or LII, based off of these pictures:

She seems an ESI, I really doubt she can be a LII.

And anyway, VI can work pretty well if you don't look for rigid and beforehand established principles, like ample forehead, small eyes, etc. For me as an ILE, I find VI not only quite possible but also quite tangible if you look for two things: First the abstract impression that the whole conjunct of a person's facial physiognomy gives you (most probably it'd be easier if you had a strong component) and also the facial and body expression, this is most surely a really good technique, since a person's facial expression is shaped in it's substance by the configuration and the framework of their personality's structure. Then we have to conclude that facial and body expression is at least in some extent - we cannot measure the degree yet - influenced by the person's Socionics Type, or Enneatype, what so ever.

[xerx]

Hi Eunice. You VI a lot like this girl I went to school with. No clue about her type but I thought IJ then.

I know we've never talked or anything, but Glam once brought up that how you describe yourself seems Ti dominant. That's also my suggestion.

I would consider myself not really in-tuned with my feelings. It's like, I have a limited range of emotions. Unlike other Beta NFs, I don't have very varied emotions. For instance, till today, I haven't never experienced anger before, don't know what been angry feels like and I never understand why would people get angry. Whenever I see people get emotional over a music, person, concert etc., I find it foreign because I have never have such strong feelings over something. Sounds weird, but sometimes I will even be unsure about how I am feeling. I would consider myself a very even-tempered person.

This is pretty Ti ego-ish, especially the limited range of emotional expression and being unsure of what you're feeling.

We rarely hold grudges because of weak Fe, and I've never seen a Ti IJ holding a grudge against a particular person, because the costs involved just aren't worth the costs in energy. We may or may not easily accept and forgive (depends on a bunch of factors), and we can certainly avoid or oppose people we didn't like, but experiencing hatred on a deeper emotional level (like anger) is hard to do.

So, I guess I'm an emotionally subdued person, but I enjoy making friends (or potential partners) with positive people who are emotionally effusive and constantly encouraging me and opening my eyes to the beautiful side of life since I can worry too much about the uncertainty of the future. I also tend to like people from whom I can learn something new from and about them every now and then. I tend to get bored when there is nothing more to learn about them and the relationship basically becomes stagnated and I don't see any potential in carrying it on. (That was currently what was going on between me and my ESTj (technically) best friend.) As such, I'm prone to liking guys who are friendly, sociable, active and constantly improving themselves, leading life with a sense of purpose. It would be better if they also believe strongly in serving their communities and not afraid of to accept leadership roles and make a difference.

It sounds like you'd be happy in a relationship with an EJ, Si creative. The bolded part suggests ESE much more than either LSE or EIE.

You could still be EII, but I doubt you're any kind of Fe ego if what's written above sums you up well.

Welcome back btw.

[717495]

Okay, okay. If we're really doing VI and I would force myself to say something, then I'd go with EII.

[eunice]

I've always assumed eunice was an IEI. As for VI, it's obvious it doesn't really work

Yeah, I VI more Ne/Si.

Hi Eunice. You VI a lot like this girl I went to school with. No clue about her type but I thought IJ then.

I know we've never talked or anything, but Glam once brought up that how you describe yourself seems Ti dominant. That's also my suggestion.



This is pretty Ti ego-ish, especially the limited range of emotional expression and being unsure of what you're feeling.

We rarely hold grudges because of weak Fe, and I've never seen a Ti IJ holding a grudge against a particular person, because the costs involved just aren't worth the costs in energy. We may or may not easily accept and forgive (depends on a bunch of factors), and we can certainly avoid or oppose people we didn't like, but experiencing hatred on a deeper emotional level (like anger) is hard to do.



It sounds like you'd be happy in a relationship with an EJ, Si creative. The bolded part suggests ESE much more than either LSE or EIE.

You could still be EII, but I doubt you're any kind of Fe ego if what's written above sums you up well.

Welcome back btw.

Hi jxtres, it's been awhile since I have read your posts as well.

As for the limited range of emotional expression, I have been informed by people around me about this weakness. I'm not someone who gets overtly excited very easily and some have described me as one of the calmest persons they have ever known. Based on one of my interactions with an ex-schoolmate whom I have typed as an ESTp, he seems frustrated by what he perceived as the lack of feedback he gets from me and finds me hard to read as an individual. I rarely get angry, but there was once someone has provoked me incessantly to the extent that I have a sudden outburst. This had shocked that particular person as he had thought that I was nonchalant due to my lack of display of emotions.

As for my relationship, I would like someone who is more extraverted, emotionally effusive and comfortable in his own skin. I'm already quite an inexpressive person, I don't need someone who is too formal or business-like. I like people who are curious about me and would like to learn more about me, and not talk too much about himself. He must also be someone who surprises me by the new things i discover about him every now and then. Hence, someone who is too predictable is not preferred.

[Exodus]

Coosing somthing that make her feel good.

" I like because it makes me feel good" SiFe

I think I agree, but probably more than . The pictures make me think some type.

@eunice, have you ever considered SLI? Having a limited emotional range could suggest that you are a logical type. I think I might really like this typing for you.

[eunice]

I think I agree, but probably more than . The pictures make me think some type.

@eunice, have you ever considered SLI? Having a limited emotional range could suggest that you are a logical type. I think I might really like this typing for you.

I think I'm more of a rational type.

[Creepy-Pied Piper]

Removed at User Request

[krieger]

Oh bother. Here. We. Go. Again.......

[717495]

Pinnochio, how do you define a rational (J) type and the difference from an irrational (P)? Is it the same to what Socionics says? If you can, try to go into some basic comparison that makes sense to me.

By the way, your article at socionics.com, about quadra merry vs serious, etc. I primarily identified with Beta. I thought that it is weird if its your article and you type me EII, and having trouble talking with Betas, and me likely not valuing Ti. I didn't look at it for long or analyze it though. So I'll do it once more, even though I might not really care much. Much of these things could go both ways, so I say to myself that I really could be a merry type from your description, and am probably thinking that I'm misinterpreting what you mean by all that stuff, and am probably not merry from your standards. It's fun anyway, because I can see how certain people identify with all of decisive or judicious, for example.

[Creepy-Pied Piper]

Removed at User Request