Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Leverage show

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Bananas are good. Aleksei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    The Rift
    TIM
    C-EIE, 7-4-8 sx/sp
    Posts
    1,624
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Nate: LSI-Fi, 6w5 sp/so (INTJ)
    Sophie: EIE-Ni, 6w7 sx/sp (ENFP)
    Parker: SLE-Se, 7w8 sp/sx (ESTP)
    Hardison: ILE-Ne, 5w4 so/sp (ENTP)
    Elliott: SLE-Fi, 7w8 sp/so (ESTP)
    What do these signs mean—, , etc.? Why cannot socionists use symbols Ne, Ni etc. as in MBTI? Just because they have somewhat different meaning. Socionics and MBTI, each in its own way, have slightly modified the original Jung's description of his 8 psychological types. For this reason, (Ne) is not exactly the same as Ne in MBTI.

    Just one example: in MBTI, Se (extraverted sensing) is associated with life pleasures, excitement etc. By contrast, the socionic function (extraverted sensing) is first and foremost associated with control and expansion of personal space (which sometimes can manifest in excessive aagression, but often also manifests in a capability of managing lots of people and things).

    For this reason, we consider comparison between MBTI types and socionic types by functions to be rather useless than useful.

    -Victor DarkAngelFireWolf69, Dmitri Lytov

  2. #2
    Park's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Beyond the blue horizon
    TIM
    SLI-Si 8w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    13,421
    Mentioned
    186 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Bump
    “Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilly
    You've done yourself a huge favor developmentally by mustering the balls to do something really fucking scary... in about the most vulnerable situation possible.

  3. #3
    jughead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    NC
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    894
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I watched episodes 1-3 of season 1. I can tell it has TNT production values...has similarities to burn notice but with the more vigilante streak. Some of the main actors seem weak...ok almost all of them except the leader.
    A robin hood like show. Does it get better in seasons 2 or 3? My ILI friend noticed in the horse racing episode (3?) that the other insurance agent could have easily blackmailed the crew for the 12 million dollars since he had footage of them scamming the NY hedge fund guy. If the insurance company is so ruthless it seems he would be as well. He said he would "cut some slack" but it didn't quite fit. (Ok him and the insurance guy were actually decent actors and perhap cast right socionically I will say)
    I will have to watch more to see how their characters could possibly be typed.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •