Okay, so there's a 10% chance I'll accept electric sheeps's SEI typing. If he can get a few credible people to side with him, perhaps that will increase.
From Krig's duality thread:http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...tml#post623487
True, but I'm not sure those experiences are type related. And I'll let you play your experience card, that, and the fact that you're obviously not dumb, is why I'm taking you seriously in the first place.
You are seeing what you want to see. I want to know your motives because I want to know which personal biases could be influencing your reason. Hack an argument down at its roots.
I avoid being overly formal in certain posts for the reason that it influences the reader to be nit-picky about my choice of words. This isn't a good thing for me, as I'm usually half asleep, I suffer insomnia (which doesn't seem like something that would happen to an SEI). The right words often elude me and I end up being misinterpreted. Using a colloquial prose cuts me some slack.
And I don't think labcoat's reasoning is as "rigid" as you say. A lot of it is rhetoric. And a bit of OCD.
Kamajama sent me a friend request. It doesn't take an ethical type to gauge the emotional climate in such a situation. I really am not good at judging how people feel about me - I need to be constantly told where I stand in relationships. Before I learned that this was an LII trait, I used to think it was insecurity. AR - anal retentive. :wink:
Again, you are seeing what you want to see. In duality, we are turned inside out, but not totally inverted. The fact is that SEI generally still only find Ti useful only as far as it relates to Ne (well, as I understand things, anyway.)
You are missing the point that my focus was on the rational (for which practical purpose are we knitting?) and my cousin shifts that focus to the ethical (it gives us an excuse to hang out).
I respect that. It's just that you don't know me well enough - you are trying to type me too soon, imo.