Has anyone else noticed this?
It is quite a specific trait that I see again and again.
Some examples:
![]()
Has anyone else noticed this?
It is quite a specific trait that I see again and again.
Some examples:
![]()
SLI
Liz Taylor is SEE and you are right they do have butterfly eyes.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
can you explain what you mean by butterfly eyes? Is it the shape of the eye? or the eye lashes?
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Could it be that many *feminine or F-type* *actors* have butterfly eyes? (male/female)
Could it be that many SEE are just flirts? (eyes being one manifestation)
Could it be something subconsciously emphasized by the rest of the facial expression?
Could it be a good mascara application? :wink:
--
I'm always somewhat uncomfortable with VI because it seems close to becoming a (questionable) physical justification to stereotyping & predjudice-
That path to walk down is littered with the tragic histories of many men & women (of various religions, races, etc..) being VI'ed culturally so to speak - physicality being a "justified" reason for persecution -
Sorry if this is a rain on the parade - just wondering -