Results 1 to 40 of 74

Thread: New Test

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    57
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Your result for The Experimental Socionics Test ...
    SLI

    1% ESE, -3% LIE, -1% SEE, -1% IEE, 5% SLI, -7% ILI, 5% EIE, 3% LSI, 3% LII, -5% SEI, 1% ILE, 1% SLE, -1% IEI, 1% ESI, 1% EII, -5% LSE and 0% Unknown!


    But I got 5% on EIE, too. So I guess I tied with SLI and EIE (conflictors...) as my highest scores?
    EIE-Ni

  2. #2
    Your DNA is mine. Mediator Kam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    4,477
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ILE
    -5% ESE, -5% LIE, 1% SEE, 1% IEE, -1% SLI, -5% ILI, -1% EIE, 5% LSI, -3% LII, 1% SEI, 7% ILE, -1% SLE, 5% IEI, -1% ESI, -1% EII, 1% LSE and 0% Unknown!
    D-SEI 9w1

    This is me and my dual being scientific together

  3. #3
    Grand Inquisitor Bardia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    ESI
    Posts
    1,251
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Your result for The Experimental Socionics Test ...
    EII

    -1 ESE, -1 LIE, 1 SEE, 1 IEE, -1 SLI, 3 ILI, 3 EIE, 1 LSI, 1 LII, -3 SEI, -5 ILE, 3 SLE, -7 IEI, -1 ESI, 7 EII, -1 LSE and 0 Unknown!
    “No psychologist should pretend to understand what he does not understand... Only fools and charlatans know everything and understand nothing.” -Anton Chekhov

    http://kevan.org/johari?name=Bardia0
    http://kevan.org/nohari?name=Bardia0

  4. #4
    Jesus is the cruel sausage consentingadult's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,780
    Mentioned
    110 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Unknown
    .

    You foiled the test. Either you answered "unknown" one too many times, or there was a tie in your results.

    0% ESE, 0% LIE, 0% SEE, 0% IEE, 0% SLI, 0% ILI, 0% EIE, 0% LSI, 0% LII, 0% SEI, 0% ILE, 0% SLE, 0% IEI, 0% ESI, 0% EII, 0% LSE and 6% Unknown!

    Making tests based on Reinin Dichotomies is useless, because Reinin is based on Forer Effect. For each question both answers applied to some equal extent in my case.

    Thank you for proving once more that Reinin is useless.
    “I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking

  5. #5
    "Information without energy is useless" Nowisthetime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    near Russia
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    1,022
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    SEI

    -4% ESE, 2% LIE, 2% SEE, 0% IEE, 2% SLI, -4% ILI, -2% EIE, 0% LSI, -2% LII, 4% SEI, 2% ILE, 0% SLE, 2% IEI, -2% ESI, 0% EII, -2% LSE and 2% Unknown!

  6. #6
    The Looks stanprollyright's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    In your pants
    TIM
    IEE-Ne cp 6w7 sx/so
    Posts
    555
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    IEI
    -3% ESE, 1% LIE, -1% SEE, 3% IEE, 5% SLI, -3% ILI, -3% EIE, -1% LSI, -5% LII, -1% SEI, 1% ILE, -3% SLE, 7% IEI, 1% ESI, -3% EII, 1% LSE and 0% Unknown!
    Stan is not my real name.

  7. #7
    Trevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,840
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by consentingadult View Post
    Making tests based on Reinin Dichotomies is useless..
    Not if we first find out what do Reinin Dichotomies actually represent, if anything of value.

    I am believer.

  8. #8
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,684
    Mentioned
    95 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  9. #9

    Default

    5% SLI higher than 94%
    5% EIE higher than 92%

    I am my own conflictor.

    -3% ESE, -7% LIE, 3% SEE, -1% IEE, 5% SLI, -3% ILI, 5% EIE, 3% LSI, -1% LII, -1% SEI, 5% ILE, 1% SLE

  10. #10
    Poster Nutbag The Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    my own personal bubble
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    4,097
    Mentioned
    103 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by reclaimpower View Post
    5% SLI higher than 94%
    5% EIE higher than 92%

    I am my own conflictor.

    -3% ESE, -7% LIE, 3% SEE, -1% IEE, 5% SLI, -3% ILI, 5% EIE, 3% LSI, -1% LII, -1% SEI, 5% ILE, 1% SLE

    It's actually not a bad result to have. Conflictors share 7 out of 11 reinin dichotomies in common! More than if you compare other types.
    LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP



  11. #11
    Poster Nutbag The Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    my own personal bubble
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    4,097
    Mentioned
    103 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    The rational/irrational question should be replaced with judicious/decisive.
    LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP



  12. #12

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,968
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Overall it's a nice test, but objectively (not thinking about the dichotomy each question is supposed to be about, but really thinking about what it says in relation to how I am) I could only find about two questions where I could answer anything other than "unsure." I think this comes from the way people usually talk about Socionics makes a lot of assumptions that if you really think about them are difficult to apply to real life.

    For example, what really does it mean to "reject information"? Certain people will tend to argue against any theory or view that is put forth, whereas others will appear like instant true believers. But is this really about rejecting or accepting "information"? Surely people accept some kinds of information and not others. Even if one tends to accept or reject certain kinds of information, probably a lot of factors come into play.

    Socionists often simplify, categorizing people into the acceptors and rejectors. But real life isn't as black and white.

  13. #13

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,968
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The next question is trying to differentiate short- vs. long-term orientation. But if someone is really inclined to be helpful, wouldn't the person be likely to do both? And if the person isn't much inclined to be very helpful, they'd probably not do much of either. Maybe someone observing the person can tell if the person is more short- or long-term oriented. But apart from being a self-report question, it's confounded by the issue of helpfulness; the degree to which one is inclined to help others (which probably varies a lot over time) my affect the results somewhat.

  14. #14

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,968
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    #3...The issue with stability is mentioned a lot in Socionics. But it's only in comparison to other people that one can really answer. Surely everybody feels stable sometimes, and changing other times. For example, are there times where I suddenly feel tired and decide to take a nap? Of course. But then again, I'm not going through bipolar emotional extremes between mania and depression each day either....and of course being bipolar or the sort of hyper-emotionally person who does go on such swings probably isn't necessarily what this dichotomy is intended to measure...but all of this gets mixed up in the wording of what the question actually says.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •