Really? I wouldn't expect an LSE to miss a single relevant detail (I think of them as highly detail oriented types).
Really? I wouldn't expect an LSE to miss a single relevant detail (I think of them as highly detail oriented types).
Not a rule, just a trend.
IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.
Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...
I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.
LSE's are focused on the hands-on crap. They make great surgeons and craftsmen.
a lot of them work at the office.Originally Posted by Joy
I'll bet they hate it.
They sure don't.
The ones that I know are... administrators and a manager.
I associate hands on experience with Se types actually.
Te is abstract and Se involved.
The end is nigh
I tend to look at S and F as very compact, direct reference functions, and N and T as more open, thus allowing ceteris paribus hypothetical scenarios to be conceived; for this reason Alphas (having dynamic SF ego/superid) seem to have very open egos/compact ids/extroverted internals/introverted externals and Gammas (having static SF ego/superid) seem to have very compact egos/open ids/introverted internals/extroverted externals...autocrats split internals and externals rather than compact and open elements, so Betas have compact extroverts/open introverts and Deltas have compact introverts/open extroverts...
The effort to correlate sociotypes with careers is one of the most misguided in socionics.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote