Implied: ISFp

[Gilly]

Just look at the way she acts: plenty of Fe, always expressing herself. I would argue for I on the grounds that what she says comes off as somewhat restrained or filtered, as thought it's been thought through first.

Si as a dominant function: VERY conflict avoidant, or so it seems to me. Good aesthetic taste (supposedly), and the kind of generally sanguine attitude that goes with this type: this is a bit hard to articulate, but I think anyone who's talked to her for more than 5 minutes knows what I'm talking about. She doesn't like to be the center of attention in chat: she always seems as though she "tones down" whenever people start to focus on her. She's also definitely gossipy: I think more than a few of us can testify to that :wink:

Ti hidden agenda: She seems to love it when someone is willing to be patient with her and explain something out step-by-step, as I've learned in my brief interactions with her.

[Expat]

No, I don't think we're conflictors.

[Gilly]

gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

[implied]

[Expat]

Ti hidden agenda: She seems to love it when someone is willing to be patient with her and explain something out step-by-step, as I've learned in my brief interactions with her.

That's not hidden agenda, but as 5th or 6th function.

[Joy]

no friggin way gilligan. implied is NOT alpha.

[Gilly]

Prove me wrong.

[Joy]

Just look at the way she acts: plenty of Fe, always expressing herself. I would argue for I on the grounds that what she says comes off as somewhat restrained or filtered, as thought it's been thought through first.

Si as a dominant function: VERY conflict avoidant, or so it seems to me... and the kind of generally sanguine attitude that goes with this type: this is a bit hard to articulate, but I think anyone who's talked to her for more than 5 minutes knows what I'm talking about. She doesn't like to be the center of attention in chat: she always seems as though she "tones down" whenever people start to focus on her. She's also definitely gossipy: I think more than a few of us can testify to that :wink:

none of this makes sense to me

[Gilly]

That's because you're not an introvert.

[discojoe]

Prove me wrong.

BURDEN OF PROOF.

[Gilly]

Yes, peter. I already made my case though. She hasn't refuted anything I've said.

[implied]

[Joy]

Yes, peter. I already made my case though. She hasn't refuted anything I've said.

that's because she's amused

[discojoe]

Yes, peter. I already made my case though. She hasn't refuted anything I've said.

NO.

[Gilly]

Yes, peter. I already made my case though. She hasn't refuted anything I've said.

that's because she's amused

Then I've succeeded

[Gilly]

Yes, peter. I already made my case though. She hasn't refuted anything I've said.

NO.

YES.

[Cone]

So I suppose the question is, gilly, that why are you trying to take implied away from me?

[Gilly]

Cone, it's a joke.

I'm suprised none of you realized it. Half of that stuff isn't even true.

[implied]

[Transigent]

Edited for gayness.

[Cone]

I hate you Transigent. Seriously, you make me more worried than I should be.

[Transigent]

Edited for gayness.

[Cone]

This secret stuff is fun, but you are making me afraid to know what the answer will be.

[Joy]

Cone, why do you assume he's correct? (<3 Transigent)

[Cone]

I have no idea what he's even TALKING ABOUT.

[implied]

[Transigent]

Edited for gayness.

[Cone]

I need some more hints. My Ni doesn't work off of nothing.

[Transigent]

Edited for gayness.

[implied]

[Hugo]

Implied is not isfp

[Transigent]

Edited for gayness.

[Hugo]

good

[Cone]

lol

So is that your secret Transigent? That you think she is ISFp?

I think, given that I am INTp and Joy really is ISFp that I can prove that our interaction is not one of super-ego relations. However, I cannot prove myself what relation we actually have together, but I can outline the basic points of our interaction.

We will speak of this on the morrow, my good man!

[implied]

[Dioklecian]

lol

So is that your secret Transigent? That you think she is ISFp?

I think, given that I am INTp and Joy really is ISFp !

Invalid!

[Satan]

Implied .. ISFp...

NON SENSICAL ...

Get rid of this shit.

[Transigent]

Edited for gayness.

[Catholic Schoolboy]

I have no idea what he's even TALKING ABOUT.

Wow, where is your Ni Cone?

CONE is a thinking subtype. Is brain is full of Te cum.

[Cone]

Yeah, I can't see how she could be ISFp considering her interactions with myself and Sycophant. For me the rule for ISFps is "admiration at a distance". They embody many of the same ideals I do myself, and this makes them highly attractive, however close interaction is a VERY BAD THING. My relation with implied is completely opposite of this. She embodies things that I would NEED and WANT rather than what I am. As well she is highly attractive at a close distance, not far. Also our conversations are kind of lopsided in that when one is only talking the other is only listening. In other words, one of us speaks in story mode and the other listens with genuine interest. Very non-argumentative and non-reactive.