he's another unicorn
LSE men are very rare on obscurity psychology forums. He's talking style differs from my significantly.
"promise me you are never going to use socionics to justify having a poor relationship with your child"
this reminds F type. mb even FN
"my random comment of the day:
There is a vast, huge difference within types.
enneagram, enneagram instinct, apti, cultural/social norms, conditioning, age, experience, associative experiences and memories, etc, all factors."
Here you may notice a chaotic text format - high/low letter case. Also is not usual for LSE. It's significantly more expected from P or N type.
his profile avatar
this reminds F type humor. and it's not how serious LSE would represent themselves
In sum: it's not LSE. At best it's close SLI.