Hypothetical DCNH subtype descriptions

[Sanguine Miasma]

EII creative. Well, I suppose the emphasis would be in their internal worlds, imagination and bringing it out in some ways. I suppose being a writer, an artist etc... The end result if everything goes well would be bit Se-ish (aka gaining recognition).

[FDG]

This thread is simply awful. Those descriptions were not meant for DCNH. This is an attempt at discrediting socionics.

[Sanguine Miasma]

So I have been deciphering DarkAngelFireWolf69 scriptures. In order to gain some calibration points and better understanding of variation.

It appears, although indirectly, that DCNH subtypes are attached to supervision ring.

For example:
ILE-D is ILE (identity) subtype of ILE
ILE-C would be LSI (supervisee) subtype of ILE
ILE-N would be SEE (super-ego) subtype of ILE
ILE-H would be EII (supervisor) subtype of ILE

Which is in better logical harmony than saying H subtype is reminiscent of conflictor. This one would be also connected to cognitive styles.

[Which makes me rethink of my subtype. Because I might have inclination towards Dostoevsky stuff while Dreiser stuff seems very off]

[Raver]

This is complete hogwash. You can't split the two Socionics subtypes descriptions into four DCNH descriptions.

[Sanguine Miasma]

This is complete hogwash. You can't split the two Socionics subtypes descriptions into four DCNH descriptions.

What about supervision ring subtypes?

[Raver]

What about supervision ring subtypes?

Seems interesting. I am not sure what to make of it yet tbh.

[Bertrand]

I feel like you're onto something with the supervision ring thing. it makes sense to me on a gut level

[at sirac son of sirac]

So I have been deciphering DarkAngelFireWolf69 scriptures. In order to gain some calibration points and better understanding of variation.

It appears, although indirectly, that DCNH subtypes are attached to supervision ring.

For example:
ILE-D is ILE (identity) subtype of ILE
ILE-C would be LSI (supervisee) subtype of ILE
ILE-N would be SEE (super-ego) subtype of ILE
ILE-H would be EII (supervisor) subtype of ILE

Which is in better logical harmony than saying H subtype is reminiscent of conflictor. This one would be also connected to cognitive styles.

[Which makes me rethink of my subtype. Because I might have inclination towards Dostoevsky stuff while Dreiser stuff seems very off]

I'm not sure I see the point to all this, that is; I already know there are differences within types, ie, I don't need 2 subtype, or DCNH to provide an attempt to classify differences within type. Type enough appears sufficient for me just now. But I wanted to like your post and respond to show my appreciation for your Ti, (and Ne) and to say I think you make a pretty good example of ILE.

[Kiba]

This is complete hogwash. You can't split the two Socionics subtypes descriptions into four DCNH descriptions.

True, the description for subtype in here for SLI is in reality the one and the one is , so how that can make any sense?

They dont even match the IEs traits. is not mobile or likes to change impressions. And how on earth subtype would be less operational, gregarious and humanitarian?

[lavos]

So I have been deciphering DarkAngelFireWolf69 scriptures. In order to gain some calibration points and better understanding of variation.

It appears, although indirectly, that DCNH subtypes are attached to supervision ring.

For example:
ILE-D is ILE (identity) subtype of ILE
ILE-C would be LSI (supervisee) subtype of ILE
ILE-N would be SEE (super-ego) subtype of ILE
ILE-H would be EII (supervisor) subtype of ILE

Which is in better logical harmony than saying H subtype is reminiscent of conflictor. This one would be also connected to cognitive styles.

[Which makes me rethink of my subtype. Because I might have inclination towards Dostoevsky stuff while Dreiser stuff seems very off]

This rings true. Would explain why I have been typed INFp by some people. Will try to observe if it works.