Results 1 to 26 of 26

Thread: INTjs-LIIs not admitting when they are wrong

  1. #1
    jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,309
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default INTjs-LIIs not admitting when they are wrong

    I was having a conversation with my brother the other day. He was telling me that my biggest problem is that I never admit that I'm wrong. This was in reference to a specific issue. The problem was that I was certain that I was right about this particular issue. Then, I thought about it. Even in school, there have been times when I've done badly at particular tests. In these cases, I didn't think that my study strategy was "wrong", it was just that the elements of chance caused me to do poorly, or the test wasn't well-designed; usually, my study strategies work out well! I thought about it even further, and I'm almost always certain that I'm right - even when people disagree with me and provide what seems to be good reasoning to support their claims. However, I don't like arguments, so I almost always just agree with them to calm things down (even though, on the inside, I either don't understand where they're coming from or still disagree...). Basically, it seems that, in my eyes, I'm never wrong!

    It's also interesting that I have another friend who is this way. He might also be LII, but it's weird how we get on each other's nerves. For example, I told him that I've been studying various scientific theories, and how intuitive I find a lot of Einstein's thought experiments to be (e.g., about "space elevators", etc.). His response was that he finds biology to be really intuitive. I thought that what he said sounded crazy, because biology is about the least intuitive subject to me!

    Anyway, has anyone else noticed this basic phenomenon amongst LIIs?

    Jason

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    moon
    Posts
    4,848
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    yes I have noticed

  3. #3
    Contrarian Traditionalist Krig the Viking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Canada's Prairie Farmland
    TIM
    C-LII
    Posts
    2,608
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I've noticed as well, and spend a great deal of conscious effort trying to counteract it. It's hard, though.

    To quote some random Internet sage: "Nothing sucks more than that moment during an argument when you realize you're wrong. "
    Quaero Veritas.

  4. #4
    Sauron, The Great Enemy ArchonAlarion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    TIM
    Yet to be determined
    Posts
    4,411
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    hmm I see LII's easily admitting they're wrong. Depends on how much time they've put into their beliefs though.

    Also could be related to 6w5, 5w6, 1w9.

    For Alpha NT's I'd say this is because Ti is not dependent on objective criteria and will restructure its mindset to suit new information/ideas.

    So like, you may have been wrong, but you have already discarded the wrong idea and in hindsight you don't think it was a big deal.

    Sometimes I will subtley shift my position in an argument because I can tell I was off a bit. Then, I'll leave the argument "right" even though I started off wrong. This could frustrate people because they can't really remember where their original accusation went and wonder how I ended up being right.
    The end is nigh

  5. #5
    redbaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9,315
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I've noticed LIIs never admitting they're wrong. But I'm the same way.

    Not sure this is type-related.
    IEI-Fe 4w3

  6. #6
    Trevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,840
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It's stupid to admit that you're wrong if you cannot see that you are wrong. If you are wrong and you can see that, and you still don't want to admit it, than you're stu(bborn)pid.

    I know some LIIs who never admit they're wrong because they cannot see how they're wrong. Although some of them often are wrong. I also think that some of them somewhere deep down feel they're wrong but just won't give up which leads to a conclusion that they're stubbornpid. Related to thinking subtype.

    It can be hard to step out of your own point of view. It can be hard to step out of your own Ti.

  7. #7
    Angel of Lightning Brilliand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Utah
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    4,235
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ArchonAlarion View Post
    Sometimes I will subtley shift my position in an argument because I can tell I was off a bit. Then, I'll leave the argument "right" even though I started off wrong. This could frustrate people because they can't really remember where their original accusation went and wonder how I ended up being right.
    I do this - sometimes when I'm very wrong, the "subtle shift" is a total descent into tautology. However, this sometimes makes people mad, so I go through a ritual of "admitting I'm wrong" when I see a danger that they'll notice and get mad (most common with Fi types, I think). When I'm discussing something with another Ti type and the topic we're discussing is just a minor point in something else, I'll often just go "oh, OK" and skip to the next point - my thoughts being a descent into tautology, followed by the realization that the tautology is irrelevant to what we're discussing.



    LII-Ne

    "Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
    - Blair Houghton

    Johari

  8. #8
    Sauron, The Great Enemy ArchonAlarion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    TIM
    Yet to be determined
    Posts
    4,411
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brilliand View Post
    I do this - sometimes when I'm very wrong, the "subtle shift" is a total descent into tautology. However, this sometimes makes people mad, so I go through a ritual of "admitting I'm wrong" when I see a danger that they'll notice and get mad (most common with Fi types, I think). When I'm discussing something with another Ti type and the topic we're discussing is just a minor point in something else, I'll often just go "oh, OK" and skip to the next point - my thoughts being a descent into tautology, followed by the realization that the tautology is irrelevant to what we're discussing.
    yes same. I make it very clear when I realize Im wrong too.
    The end is nigh

  9. #9
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jason_m View Post
    I was having a conversation with my brother the other day. He was telling me that my biggest problem is that I never admit that I'm wrong. This was in reference to a specific issue. The problem was that I was certain that I was right about this particular issue. Then, I thought about it. Even in school, there have been times when I've done badly at particular tests. In these cases, I didn't think that my study strategy was "wrong", it was just that the elements of chance caused me to do poorly, or the test wasn't well-designed; usually, my study strategies work out well! I thought about it even further, and I'm almost always certain that I'm right - even when people disagree with me and provide what seems to be good reasoning to support their claims. However, I don't like arguments, so I almost always just agree with them to calm things down (even though, on the inside, I either don't understand where they're coming from or still disagree...). Basically, it seems that, in my eyes, I'm never wrong!

    It's also interesting that I have another friend who is this way. He might also be LII, but it's weird how we get on each other's nerves. For example, I told him that I've been studying various scientific theories, and how intuitive I find a lot of Einstein's thought experiments to be (e.g., about "space elevators", etc.). His response was that he finds biology to be really intuitive. I thought that what he said sounded crazy, because biology is about the least intuitive subject to me!

    Anyway, has anyone else noticed this basic phenomenon amongst LIIs?

    Jason
    I never admit I am wrong in an argument

    I only admit I am wrong, when I feel my actions have "wronged" someone

    But with words.... I never admit I am wrong, whats the point? To let the other person feel all righteous? What good does it do.... "oh btw, you were right".... people shouldn't have to identify who is right and who is wrong in a conversation.... its seems stupid imo. I mean I don't admit I am wrong, but alot of times people will convince me of something I missed or didn't notice.... but I don't think that makes me wrong.

  10. #10
    Angel of Lightning Brilliand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Utah
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    4,235
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    "Oh really? That changes things! In that case..." <totally changes his mind>

    "But it was true all along!"



    LII-Ne

    "Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
    - Blair Houghton

    Johari

  11. #11
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brilliand View Post
    "Oh really? That changes things! In that case..." <totally changes his mind>

    "But it was true all along!"
    Exactly, I mean no one is "right" all the time, so its ridiculous to label people as "right" and "wrong" imo. Fundamentally I don't think people can be "right", I mean you can be "right" about something.... but not "right" about everything.

  12. #12
    Glorious Member mu4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Mind
    Posts
    8,174
    Mentioned
    759 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Anyways, LII's admit they're wrong sometimes. Take Wittgenstein and his alterations in his philosophy later in life or Kant and his wake from his dogmatic slumber. They also are corrective when this happens.

    There are people that find out they've made a mistake in some fashion and never admit it. They believe they're wrong yet lie about it. There are also those who admit they're wrong and is lying about that.

    As a whole I believe I can be wrong, any of my beliefs can be wrong, but it's impossible for me to believe that my beliefs are wrong if I believe they're not.

    I value novel, informative criticism, clear explanations of processes and corrective realization of then any conciliation. Someone that changes and corrects themselves at least knows the consequences of their assertions. I much prefer this then those that merely right their thinking for the appearance of piety and appeasement.

  13. #13
    jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,309
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hkkmr View Post
    Anyways, LII's admit they're wrong sometimes. Take Wittgenstein and his alterations in his philosophy later in life or Kant and his wake from his dogmatic slumber. They also are corrective when this happens.
    Two points here:

    1) I personally find that it's much more satisfying to later disprove one of my own beliefs than for someone else to have done the job.

    2) I believe Kant is an LII, but I wonder about Wittgenstein. I read a biography on Wittgenstein. He had a lot of interest in religion, and a lot of his personal beliefs delved into the mystical. I have considered ILI for Wittgenstein (but LII is still possible).

    Jason

  14. #14
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hkkmr View Post
    Anyways, LII's admit they're wrong sometimes. Take Wittgenstein and his alterations in his philosophy later in life or Kant and his wake from his dogmatic slumber. They also are corrective when this happens.

    There are people that find out they've made a mistake in some fashion and never admit it. They believe they're wrong yet lie about it. There are also those who admit they're wrong and is lying about that.

    As a whole I believe I can be wrong, any of my beliefs can be wrong, but it's impossible for me to believe that my beliefs are wrong if I believe they're not.

    I value novel, informative criticism, clear explanations of processes and corrective realization of then any conciliation. Someone that changes and corrects themselves at least knows the consequences of their assertions. I much prefer this then those that merely right their thinking for the appearance of piety and appeasement.
    My thing is sometimes a person isn't wrong, so much as misrepresented in their ideas and intentions. The essence of truth is there but it hasn't reached its full fruition*. Alot of times people will simply try to make people "accept the fact they are just wrong" because they don't see that potential there. The sad part about it is, if a person yeilds and just chooses to accept their "wrongness" they may abandon their pursuits of truth.

    I mean this doesn't even have to do with the obvious example of coming up with ideas and theories.... it may well have to do with moral "wrongness".... someone tries to get a person to admit they've done something wrong, when the truth is they just misunderstood and have good intentions.... and its sad to see a person crush those latent good intentions by making the person believe they are just a bad person by nature and admit their fault and accept punishment.

    *Did you know that according to one definition fruition means state of bearing fruit?
    Last edited by male; 09-28-2009 at 09:17 PM.

  15. #15
    wants to be a writer. silverchris9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,072
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hkkmr View Post
    I value novel, informative criticism, clear explanations of processes and corrective realization of then any conciliation. Someone that changes and corrects themselves at least knows the consequences of their assertions. I much prefer this then those that merely right their thinking for the appearance of piety and appeasement.
    Yes. This thread seems to be very much about not-Fi (ethical categorization and such), hence I agree completely (Not that Fi is all about appearances of piety, but it can seem that way).

    HaveLucid, that's definitely true sometimes. But other times people are wrong. I think it's a very fine linguistic distinction: one can label a person as wrong, as in "Barack Obama: wrong on healthcare," or one can label a belief as wrong, "Thomas' position is wrong; people aren't made of potatoes, rather they're made of cells and stuff." I think you can definitely "be wrong" in the sense of holding an incorrect belief. But that can be demonstrated and accepted without, as you said, labeling a person as wrong. But that's just my take on it.
    Not a rule, just a trend.

    IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.

    Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...

    I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.

  16. #16
    Crispy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,034
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ArchonAlarion View Post
    Sometimes I will subtley shift my position in an argument because I can tell I was off a bit. Then, I'll leave the argument "right" even though I started off wrong. This could frustrate people because they can't really remember where their original accusation went and wonder how I ended up being right.
    I do this all the time (read: continuously) but instead of my mind saying "I was off a bit" it instantly perceives as if it knew the realization the whole time and says "of course that's what I meant". Once I understand something it's as if I just dug it up, but it just HAD to be there the whole time.

    But knowing this doesn't make the system any less gratifying. I will always think I'm the smarty pants and there's nothing you can do about it!

  17. #17
    Sauron, The Great Enemy ArchonAlarion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    TIM
    Yet to be determined
    Posts
    4,411
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    yeah, i was just explaining it in the way that an observer might see it.
    The end is nigh

  18. #18
    constant change electric sheep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,296
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Except when an LII admits to being wrong, it's not just an isolated incident. If I'm wrong about one thing, then there are probably several related things that depend on that one thing. It's like the laws of aerodynamics have changed, so now I have to rethink the way I build jets. A lot more is hanging on being right about that one thing than most people think.
    The saddest ESFj

    ...

  19. #19
    Sauron, The Great Enemy ArchonAlarion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    TIM
    Yet to be determined
    Posts
    4,411
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fear of sleep View Post
    Except when an LII admits to being wrong, it's not just an isolated incident. If I'm wrong about one thing, then there are probably several related things that depend on that one thing. It's like the laws of aerodynamics have changed, so now I have to rethink the way I build jets. A lot more is hanging on being right about that one thing than most people think.
    oh that's true too.
    The end is nigh

  20. #20
    Angel of Lightning Brilliand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Utah
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    4,235
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ArchonAlarion View Post
    oh that's true too.
    That's generally when the LII is right, though - I know that not all of my beliefs are necessary to other things that I believe, and these outliers are more likely than the others to be poorly thought-out (which I would realize if I tried to base a few other beliefs on them).

    Looking back, the last thing that I admitted to being wrong on was the definition of a word. I couldn't really dismiss it as semantics or "to each his own" because I had started the argument by telling someone that they were misusing a word - so I felt that I had to stand by its common usage. This was of course a belief that I didn't have anything else depending on.



    LII-Ne

    "Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
    - Blair Houghton

    Johari

  21. #21
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silverchris9 View Post
    HaveLucid, that's definitely true sometimes. But other times people are wrong. I think it's a very fine linguistic distinction: one can label a person as wrong, as in "Barack Obama: wrong on healthcare," or one can label a belief as wrong, "Thomas' position is wrong; people aren't made of potatoes, rather they're made of cells and stuff." I think you can definitely "be wrong" in the sense of holding an incorrect belief. But that can be demonstrated and accepted without, as you said, labeling a person as wrong. But that's just my take on it.
    Yea in a practical sense... I believe people can be wrong all the time. I mean I am "wrong" all the time when I attempt to do some homework or a test. In a practical sense.

    In a broad sense.... I believe people aren't really wrong, but they are just stuggling on the path to truth. Like on a homework or test.... what I write isn't just purely "wrong" and purely "non-sense".... what usually is the case is that I forgot to include some small detail that the entire correctness of the problem impenges on. The thing is, the idea was there but it just has its kinks that needed to be worked out. You can in practicality call that "wrong" but I see it as "undeveloped".... I dunno perhaps this a viewpoint that is heavily filtered through and a very neglectful of . I think thats very true though.... because from an perspective I could see the need to label things as wrong - the problem is because its PoLR for LII, most LII could care less because PoLR is something they are aware of, but simply regard as weak or undervalued.

    Also I like how that one person said.... because of , being wrong usually effects alot more things and alters their perception of logical principles.

    Also in terms of I tend to trust my inner understanding of something rather than be swayed by the convictions of an expert, because I always think "All these people have different understandings on this subject, and everyone can't be right -- if I depend on my own understanding at least my rationale is fully exposed, where as if I depend on this person, no rationale is exposed"

  22. #22
    Froody Blue Gem's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    A Place within a Place in the Universe Where they will never suspect. *Cackles like a witch.*
    TIM
    EII H-Ne
    Posts
    363
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    When it comes to being wrong about facts, especially with a subject that I'm knowledgeable about, I can be pretty stubborn. I struggle to argue/prove a point in these types of situations unless I have thought a lot about what I am going to say, but it's more an internal thing. I will take in the area that I am wrong, and try to learn more about the subject, or I won't forget for the next time.

    Or if I actually realize that I'm wrong, I get embarrassed when I am made to look incompetent in front of other people. If I perceive that I'm right and someone else is wrong, I will keep my stance on that. There are times when I know the answer to something, but I brainfart and say the wrong thing, so overall it appears that I am misinformed.
    xII se PoLR, 9w1-5w4-2w3 sp/so

    Phlegmatic-Melancholic |RCoAI| Fascinator| Newtype-secondary| LEFVl|

    #JusticeforJeb_, Water Sheep did nothing wrong, High Inquisitor Of Council of Water Sheep and Water Sheep's protector


    Make things right? Who are we to decide when things are right and when they need to be fixed?



  23. #23
    thegreenfaerie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    Neptune
    Posts
    2,199
    Mentioned
    102 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yes Jason, I think this is a potential area of weakness for LII’s. I recalled a time (though there was certainly more than one in hindsight) with a LII where I proved him wrong on something and he had a funny expression. I think he accepted defeat, but his tone was quite sullen whereas he normally has a sort of opposite demeanor. Honestly I ended up being more insightful than him in a lot of realms though I thought he could be “smarter” early on, I realized this wasn’t quite the case. I think he was a LII anyway. A Ti + Ne mother fucker It seems like a lot of the LII’s esteem could come from this sense of being right, though being Ne he was quite open to possibilities as well.

  24. #24
    Rebelondeck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    1,929
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    No type likes to be proven wrong so will attempt to resist in various ways. Now Ij-types seem to not like admitting they're wrong "on the spot" and will sometimes throw up smoke screens to extricate themselves; they seem to need to get away to think about it but after reflection, they tend to readily admit wrong thinking. Now XIIs tend to be perfectionists so any proof otherwise can be a blow to the ego - so sensitive ones will often remain in denial......

    a.k.a. I/O
    Last edited by Rebelondeck; 11-02-2019 at 02:18 PM.

  25. #25

    Join Date
    Nov 2019
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    17
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    LII's are great debaters and love to explain things one on one to people. It's very tough to admit thier wrong because it goes against their leading functions of "understanding". If you want to them to accept defeat you better have logical facts and rationale. Where they trip up sometimes is that they can leave some facts out, and if you remind them, they can see they didn't factor in this and THEN admit thier wrong,which they usually will flat out say

  26. #26
    Jesus is the cruel sausage consentingadult's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,778
    Mentioned
    109 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Like Rebelondeck already said, it's not just LIIs, but all IJs. The reason is that IJs, from their lead functions, are system-thinkers, they reason from conceptual systems, as opposed to EJs, who reason much more from "empirical" systems. Ti and Fi, in this respect, should be considered as logical and ethical systems respectively. The attitude of IJs is that, in their ideal world, everything should be an optimal adjustment to this system. (This opposed to types that have Ti or Fi as a creative function, where the systems become changable under influence of Se or Ne). The problem is: in most cases IJs can not see that "the system" is just "their system" and they can't see the flaws, limitations or incompleteness of their system, and it is next to impossible to make them think outside the box. The cannot even be convinced by the facts of life when being punched with them in the face, they will just deny that reality. Especially ESIs and EIIs can then fall into the pitfall of victimhood, claiming they are right and life and everyone else is wrong. LIIs and LSIs are similar, but they are less emotional and more stoic about it.

    https://mavericksocionics.blogspot.c...hat-is-ne.html
    “I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •