This should be fun
What's Blake's type and why?
This should be fun
-حدش, definitely -حدش. I don't know why I think this but that is definitely who your remind me of. Before they were sacked by Rome of course.
see how me and intjs don't understand each other
no one understands INTJs.
you're one of them, too.
Mean old Rocky is just teasing you. You're not an INTj. You're far too eager to know what others think and far too creative with your theories to be INTj. You're INFj (of quite possibly intuitive subtype). And that makes you my semi-dual. What a happy situation!
Yeah, I agree with Smilingeyes, I can easily see you as my mirror. We seem to be on the same chapter, but in different pages. Just my thoughts.Originally Posted by Smilingeyes
Mean old Rocky is just teasing you. You're not an INTj. You're far too eager to know what others think and far too creative with your theories to be INTj. You're INFj (of quite possibly intuitive subtype). And that makes you my semi-dual. What a happy situation!
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
I always saw Hugo like this:
On the forum, he tries to keep a VERY logical image.
He's a very persistent person.
However, he seems to be very weak on the side of theory, trying the same things over and over again relentlessly.
He's so closed-up (at least on here) that I think he's secretly a mental patient. :wink:
But he knows his stuff with exacting proficiency.
And that's all I ever saw of him.
Binary or dichotomous systems, although regulated by a principle, are among the most artificial arrangements that have ever been invented. -- William Swainson, A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals (1835)
I hadn't thought of INFj, I'll have to think about it.
What made me think of ISTj is that your approach to socionics seems to be to make it into a more rigid and clearly-defined system, with your tests. After your latest one seemed to work, you decided that that one was "it" and even told rmcnew that he did not need to work on his own test at all since yours was supposed to be perfect. Veryin an ISTj way.
To me you seem to use, which perhaps is what made FDG think of ISFj and Smilingeyes INFj, but I think your
You seem to be very rigid in many of your beliefs which I associate with the ISXj hidden agenda or, in the case of ethical beliefs, strong
I could not see a very strong, which is why I thought that, if ISTj, then ISTj logical subtype.
However, if so, thenwould be your PoLR which I find it difficult to believe that you'd mistake for your creative function.
So perhaps the best explanation is that you are INTj and most of what I described above is actually related to
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Contradiction?
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
I love my persistence and I wouldn't give it up for anything.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
I LOVE THAT CAT, BLAKE
No, it means that you know what you know exactly, but your ability to change your direction is limited. Like, your new tests were mostly small alterations of your previous ones, and they all treated the functions on the surface level. Like, there was nothing complex or underlying or anything special about the tests.Contradiction?
Binary or dichotomous systems, although regulated by a principle, are among the most artificial arrangements that have ever been invented. -- William Swainson, A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals (1835)
That's not true. I've used a whole lot of different ways to determine type.
In the end the tests (mostly) worked.
@ Blake
Interesting that even you should be doubting your type.
Do you actually have any reason to believe that you could be anything else than INTJ?
That is the way you come across to me, but there is very little personal material to work on.
I just wanted to revive this thread.
"Arnie is strong, rightfully angry and wants to kill somebody."
martin_g_karlsson
No, I don't doubt my type. I just don't care about my type. That's all.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
