View Poll Results: Taylor Swift

Voters
79. You may not vote on this poll
  • Alpha

    9 11.39%
  • Beta

    16 20.25%
  • Gamma

    5 6.33%
  • Delta

    0 0%
  • ILE

    2 2.53%
  • SEI

    5 6.33%
  • ESE

    16 20.25%
  • LII

    2 2.53%
  • EIE

    14 17.72%
  • LSI

    9 11.39%
  • SLE

    6 7.59%
  • IEI

    6 7.59%
  • SEE

    9 11.39%
  • ILI

    2 2.53%
  • LIE

    1 1.27%
  • ESI

    2 2.53%
  • LSE

    1 1.27%
  • EII

    5 6.33%
  • IEE

    0 0%
  • SLI

    1 1.27%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 289101112
Results 441 to 479 of 479

Thread: Taylor Swift

  1. #441
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,019
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @Bethanyclaire: I personally think that almost all artistcally creative people are intuitives. It just makes the most sense from a theoretical perspective.

    https://youtu.be/K-a8s8OLBSE?si=ytubJK0x2nok42ek

    Look at her video for her song cardigan. She steps into her piano to enter a fantasy world that is probably based on her imagination. Vivid daydreams are a regular symbolism for her. I think beta NF makes more sense for her than Alpha. I also have serious doubts that Travis Kelce has extroverted sensing as weakness. I am non-competitive and have a very difficult time paying attention to external reality. Meanwhile he plays in a super competitive, physical sport in which you have to be constantly aware of your surroundings and confrontational. I think Kelce is an IEI-D. I could see them getting serious but both seem very emotional to me, and I personally don't analyze relationships all that much.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  2. #442
    chriscorey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    TIM
    ILI
    Posts
    6,024
    Mentioned
    147 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bethanyclaire View Post
    greatest artist since Shakespeare and Van Gogh
    Man grows used to everything, the scoundrel!

    -Raskolnikov


  3. #443
    chriscorey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    TIM
    ILI
    Posts
    6,024
    Mentioned
    147 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    I don't like Taylor Swift on a personal level. I haven't listened to more than one of her songs, but I've seen her on stage with other performers, and she seems entirely self-interested to me.
    I don't think she's healthy, because it seems to me that she needs to be loved by strangers, and keeps kicking her boyfriend de jure to the curb once she's gotten what she wants from him (which is attention from her adolescent fans). "Let me pretend to fall in love this week with a football player who is playing in the Superbowl, so I can kiss him on the biggest show of the year and be seen by more people than anyone in the world." A month from now, he'll be gone.

    I think she's unhealthy, just as Trump is not a healthy SEE. In Trump's case, you can see the SEE under there, but you also see the overwhelming narcissism, which is not in the Socionics descriptions of any type. In Taylor's case, she needs attention from strangers, which is Fe carried to the nth degree. She also has an extremely high level of Si, which shows up in her control over her voice and her body motions, and in the costumes that she wears.

    When a person is unhealthy, they become harder to type because the personality is obscured by insanity, but personally, I think that Taylor Swift is SEI, even though she looks 100% extroverted. She looks exactly like an SEI whom I worked with for twelve years, but the SEI with whom I worked was healthy and was actually nice to be around. An extroverted SEI is an ESE, but I don't think she is ESE. Swift's face is thinner and sharper than a typical ESE's face. Therefore, the extroversion she exhibits is an act, designed to win the adulation that she unhealthily craves.

    On the other hand, I'm grateful for the fact that she's a liberal democrat (small "d" - Alpha Quadra), and her efforts to get her fans to register to vote are admirable.


    thanks Adam
    Man grows used to everything, the scoundrel!

    -Raskolnikov


  4. #444

  5. #445
    lynx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    LT
    Posts
    1,458
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @chriscorey you will enjoy this one





    State of Art All time fave

  6. #446
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bassano del Grappa, Via Rodolfi 35
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    16,835
    Mentioned
    245 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Clear SEE. I know more than one person who looks similar, and they are all married to rich ILIs.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  7. #447
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Bassano del Grappa, Via Rodolfi 35
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    16,835
    Mentioned
    245 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    I don't like Taylor Swift on a personal level. I haven't listened to more than one of her songs, but I've seen her on stage with other performers, and she seems entirely self-interested to me.
    I don't think she's healthy, because it seems to me that she needs to be loved by strangers, and keeps kicking her boyfriend de jure to the curb once she's gotten what she wants from him (which is attention from her adolescent fans). "Let me pretend to fall in love this week with a football player who is playing in the Superbowl, so I can kiss him on the biggest show of the year and be seen by more people than anyone in the world." A month from now, he'll be gone.

    I think she's unhealthy, just as Trump is not a healthy SEE. In Trump's case, you can see the SEE under there, but you also see the overwhelming narcissism, which is not in the Socionics descriptions of any type. In Taylor's case, she needs attention from strangers, which is Fe carried to the nth degree. She also has an extremely high level of Si, which shows up in her control over her voice and her body motions, and in the costumes that she wears.

    When a person is unhealthy, they become harder to type because the personality is obscured by insanity, but personally, I think that Taylor Swift is SEI, even though she looks 100% extroverted. She looks exactly like an SEI whom I worked with for twelve years, but the SEI with whom I worked was healthy and was actually nice to be around. An extroverted SEI is an ESE, but I don't think she is ESE. Swift's face is thinner and sharper than a typical ESE's face. Therefore, the extroversion she exhibits is an act, designed to win the adulation that she unhealthily craves.

    On the other hand, I'm grateful for the fact that she's a liberal democrat (small "d" - Alpha Quadra), and her efforts to get her fans to register to vote are admirable.
    False. You should meet my best ILI buddy´s SEE-Fi wife (they even divorced and got married again....typical gamma irration). She is basically the clone of Taylor Swift. When you see it you can´t unsee it. I´d say you are a bit too harsh on her. She´s surely no angel, but she didn´t kill anyone. The SEI you worked with for 12 years was SEE: if you are LIE, you would have not been able to work with your conflictor for such a large amount of time, 2-3 months are you are done.

    Listen to what she says in some of her most famous songs...."I go on too many dates...but I can´t make them stay...that´s what people say"...typical Fi creative. If you disagree, you are wrong (yes, the old FDG from 10 years ago is finally back, thank god...).
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  8. #448
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,019
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Her new album is called The Tortured Poets Department. Do you guys really not see intuition in her? I don't understand
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  9. #449
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    TIM
    IEI-Ni H946
    Posts
    2,170
    Mentioned
    128 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I just think she is a well-balanced person with well-developed ni. Rebelondeck called the polr 'soft underbelly' of a person..if it's developed well it can be a strength.

    I think she was born in the right place, at the right time. I think she had a good childhood, despite lamenting about feeling like she didn't fit it, I think she is very aware of how fortunate she is. She just knew she had observations that people would relate to..she seems to absorb culture and then create something new..whilst being an excellent observer of human behaviour.

  10. #450
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    TIM
    IEI-Ni H946
    Posts
    2,170
    Mentioned
    128 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    arguably, you could say we all have a sort of 'second type', a type which we resemble or identify with, for Taylor I would probably say that was IEI as well..for myself IEE lol.
    Last edited by Bethanyclaire; 02-16-2024 at 07:32 PM.

  11. #451
    numa numa yay kuno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2022
    Location
    USA
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    1,039
    Mentioned
    78 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by on a peaceful hiatus View Post
    Her new album is called The Tortured Poets Department. Do you guys really not see intuition in her? I don't understand
    I do see the intuition, but I think Taylor is EIE, not IEI. Her Fe is clearly dominant as she is invigorated by the crowds and the love of her fans (and the world). Her visions for her career and influence extend beyond the here and now, which is how she has managed to create such an empire for herself filled with fame and glory, all around the world. I see plenty of Fe + Ni, but she is no introvert, and I don’t care what anyone says about that, tbh. Even if Taylor occasionally describes herself as an introvert, it makes no difference to me. No introvert is as outwardly-oriented and tuned into how others feel/what others want than she is. I also believe Taylor is probably a social 2w3 in the Enneagram, but I’m not entirely sure about her Enneagram type + instincts yet.

  12. #452
    numa numa yay kuno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2022
    Location
    USA
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    1,039
    Mentioned
    78 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I also think ESE is another good option for Taylor Swift. Obviously Fe base, either way. But I’m leaning slightly more towards EIE. The thing about Taylor is that it’s hard to really guess what her actual personality is since her public persona is so carefully crafted to win others’ admiration and support. I like T Swift, but she’s no angel…

  13. #453
    is there anything surprising left? qaz00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    947
    Mentioned
    56 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Taylor Swift - DN-IEI-Fe
    Travis Kelce - DH-SLE-Se>EIE

  14. #454
    Here I am, as a Human being godslave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Location
    Southern France
    TIM
    694 sp/sx
    Posts
    3,121
    Mentioned
    172 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    There is a basic principle that I got from Dr.G and that I consider true and reliable :

    Extroverts behave and resemble Introverts in the private sphere (close psychological distance)

    Introverts behave and resemble Extroverts in the private sphere (close psychological distance)

    That's a basic truth of the human condition, however the degree with which that phenomenon occurs depends on various factors pertaining to the individual's own development. That said, it's always noticeable. One can experience that state of fact throughout one's life, in family members, siblings, classmate, friends etc..

    If you hesitate between typing someone as Introvert or Extrovert you can contrast and compare that individual's demeanor in public and in private.

    Taylor Swift is like a Super Extrovert (I mean it as conscious orientation) I wouldn't be surprised if her demeanor is more like the "shy" person in private. If one has some material on her behavior in private one could verify it. I suspect that she is just like those Extroverts who consider themselves as Introverts or "ambiverts" (which everybody is to a certain degree). Michael Jackson, Hilter, Chaplin, Freddie Mercury were good example of EIE in whom the phenomenon was clearly demonstrated.
    Last edited by godslave; 02-16-2024 at 05:25 PM.

  15. #455
    tenebrae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    TIM
    4w3 so/sx
    Posts
    194
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't like her. I don't think she's IEI. She's so middle of the road, her songs are often full of descriptions of her own experiences, she's not too universal for me... she's a great songwriter - I'm not taking that away from her - but she always fails to convey important topics that society (American society especially) are dealing with. She also never says anything about those people who paint her as an "Aryan goddess" or the face of Republican female population. I'd rather think she's ESE.

    And for her new album title - I don't like how you are painting the poetic aesthetic as a thing only Ni types do. It's not what it's named, it's about the motivation. She's simply hopping on the trend of being a deep, thoughtful poet. That's literally it.

    And that title sucks, by the way. Sometimes you gotta be a bit more subtle!
    Formerly known as littleblackcloud!

  16. #456
    You mustn't think thought control Distance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2023
    Location
    In the maze
    TIM
    Fe Ni ENFj
    Posts
    2,564
    Mentioned
    72 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't get the push pull energy of extraversion in interviews. If you push out energy, you lose it and tire, there is no gain. Extraversion is being lit in real-time and you gain in a pulling in dynamic. I don't see it.

    Another way to look at E vs I is reserved or assertive behaviors. Both types are both, but it is where you start at.

    Introversion is heavily coupled to "I" and you translate experiences through yourself subjectively relating to the outer world. Is it the royal I or the royal we?

    I get more reservedness out of her, than the other way. Plus, i don't see the ESE EJ in the 1/16 type.



    Black & white is a shallow divide ∕∕division is the color that multipliesx

    Taking things at face value is good only for a spell


    Abstract builds a soul, a house can never become a home without it


    A little better makes better more>
    ♦♦







  17. #457
    tenebrae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    TIM
    4w3 so/sx
    Posts
    194
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I might support an introtim type for her though. But IDK, I just don't like her. She's boring.
    Formerly known as littleblackcloud!

  18. #458
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    TIM
    IEI-Ni H946
    Posts
    2,170
    Mentioned
    128 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    nah ESE!

    ESE and IEI can really love each other. (Like she is besties with Selena Gomez and Blake Lively).

    I noticed it with SEI/EIE too. (Paul Mescal/Andrew Scott). How dare SEIs like EIEs more than me

  19. #459
    Salty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2024
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    EII. Contact me for phone number for further research.

  20. #460
    ren aeger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2023
    Location
    Somewhere slaving away, unfortunately.
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't think Taylor leads with extroverted feeling. It looks like it though, but I think that's apart of her brand. Her main form of confrontation is guilting; manipulating the narrative through her music, her style and her interviews, mobilizing and swaying peoples' emotions to get into their good graces, or at least, on her side. She was only (for a moment) outdone by a similarly overly dramatic SEE, Kanye West himself. Even that situation, she used to further herself. She directly confronted Katy Perry when Perry was the bigger pop girl and weaved together a good enough strategy to knock her off the top spot. She has admitted, in her music, to fear losing her high position to the next big pop girl. Taylor is most certainly a modestly dressed SEE with good management and lawyers, excellent PR and (perhaps overly-involved) stage parents who also have incredible backgrounds themselves.

    As a side-note, I think Selena Gomez is an ESI.

  21. #461

    Join Date
    Aug 2022
    TIM
    EII
    Posts
    283
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    EIE-Ni
    The way she handles and manipulates her crowds is very Fe-dominant.
    Not a sensor, definitely intuitive.

  22. #462
    What's the purpose of SEI? Tallmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Finland
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    4,287
    Mentioned
    319 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ren aeger View Post
    I don't think Taylor leads with extroverted feeling. It looks like it though, but I think that's apart of her brand. Her main form of confrontation is guilting; manipulating the narrative through her music, her style and her interviews, mobilizing and swaying peoples' emotions to get into their good graces, or at least, on her side. She was only (for a moment) outdone by a similarly overly dramatic SEE, Kanye West himself. Even that situation, she used to further herself. She directly confronted Katy Perry when Perry was the bigger pop girl and weaved together a good enough strategy to knock her off the top spot. She has admitted, in her music, to fear losing her high position to the next big pop girl. Taylor is most certainly a modestly dressed SEE with good management and lawyers, excellent PR and (perhaps overly-involved) stage parents who also have incredible backgrounds themselves.

    As a side-note, I think Selena Gomez is an ESI.
    The bold part sounds very much like Fe, advanced Fe. Are you saying it's not? Fe is about social adaptation, about being socially relevant, but it can be used in a myriad of creative ways when people are good at it. Meeting people's unconscious expectations for example (when combined with Ni), and using this for one's own benefit. Fe is common in popular culture and fashion.
    The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.

    (Jung on Si)

  23. #463
    youfloweryourfeast's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    TIM
    eii-ne
    Posts
    387
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't think she is ESE due to I think she has beta values and I don't really get how she's si creative, if you look further it's hard to see the si/ne vauling in her.

    She reminds me greatly of my EIE mother..Someone who does a lot for others but is unable to care for themselves properly due to poor Si. If my mother were ESE or if Taylor were ESE, I'd notice their attention to Si which is not found within Taylor.

    I don't believe there is anything wrong with this honestly, it's unlikely even an alpha sf would be able to come up with such lyrics, ideas as Taylor does tbh. Ni vs Si devaluing differences ofc.

    Not sure abt her enneagram but I can see 2w3 which I want to say knowing my mother who is a 2 they can be very out there. If she's not what I think of a 2 maybe she is more a 3 due to her assertiveness.
    Last edited by youfloweryourfeast; 06-26-2024 at 08:45 PM.



  24. #464
    ren aeger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2023
    Location
    Somewhere slaving away, unfortunately.
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Although I think Jung tends to write in moon rock, I've mostly derived my understanding from his original material. This is the outline for why I've come to the conclusion that Taylor is SEE.

    From what I've interpreted, extraverted sensation types are primarily concerned with deriving pleasure without themselves—seeking enjoyment or excitement from the external. Extraverted feeling types are primarily concerned with abiding by objective reality. Extraverted sensing is acquisition of external things, experiences, achievements, power, and even people for the sake of new sensations. Extraverted feeling is abiding by external order for the sake of being in accordance with general, objective values. They are both consuming, but not in the same way, if that makes sense. In fact, extraverted feeling is probably more so subjugated.

    Following this would either be introverted feeling, introverted sensation, or introverted intuition. These are reserving.

    Introverted feeling is a subjective, depth of feeling. It is less emotive, but more immense. It is easy to overlook just how much access this type has to a comprehensive array of feeling because it's cut off from the traditional expression of it. This type best expresses through poetic forms or veiled religiosity to convey how well they understand deeper feeling. The trick with this type is that as long as there is something higher than the ego, they will be okay. Problems arise when they are egotists and nothing is above their subjective feeling. This can develop into paranoid states of being able to "think" (which is bad—it's unconscious for a reason) they feel others' intentions, which are always ill-intended schemes and plots. They fall into a state whereby they must take preventative measures, by all means, and will misuse and manipulate in order to befall their "secret" enemies. Thus, this type is notably vulnerable to "arrogant ambition" and "petty tyranny."

    Introverted sensation is a type that goes with the flow—their flow. It is subjective and internally driven due to a cut off from external objects. These types are resolutely not influenced by objective content and often exude a self-possessiveness primarily concerned with creating sensations to their own liking—of convenience, comfort, health, aesthetic—instead of chasing external sensations. Since this type is cut off from external sensation, it is vulnerable to "intuiting" (again, bad) "dangerous" possibilities and ideas of the rejected objective reality. Thus, this type is notably vulnerable to doom and gloom.

    Introverted intuition is even tougher for me to explain than what I've tried to accomplish above. I don't think I can. These types are otherworldly, future-oriented, and are truly, notably different. They're mostly concerned with an unintelligible vision. I didn't even consider this a possibility for Taylor. This is an easy one to spot, but a hard one to explain. You just... know.

    Now, to put it together: Taylor strikes me as someone mostly concerned with seeking and obtaining external sensations. She absolutely seeks acquisition and expansion. She is self-admittedly calculating—or strategic as she would most likely prefer, all for the sake of snuffing out her perceived enemies, gaining (prior to having) and remaining in power. LDR confirmed Taylor does really want achievements "more than anyone else." She admitted her stable relationship was boring and seems to derive the most pleasure from her most tumultuous affairs. She absolutely throws her weight around, not to keep people in accordance, but to keep people beneath her. I think she is a fantastic writer because of her depth of understanding of feeling, and combined with this natural awareness, and consumption of/entwinedness with the objective reality around her (of which most the rest of us merely forfeit to), she is able to convey these feelings and sensations in a way that other people are able to easily grasp, and get lost in, and not know why. Possibly because they experience, but don't consume.

    All in all, to me, this is base Se and second Fi. A base Fe and second Si wouldn't be able to "control", of the external as much as Taylor has shown she is. Or, if they could, they wouldn't care to. An ESE wouldn't have this much awareness, if that makes sense.

    In conclusion...,

    Ni is so far in the ether as a possibility, it probably wasn't worth me mentioning.

    Thank you.
    Last edited by ren aeger; 09-02-2024 at 04:58 AM.

  25. #465
    ren aeger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2023
    Location
    Somewhere slaving away, unfortunately.
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tallmo View Post
    The bold part sounds very much like Fe, advanced Fe. Are you saying it's not? Fe is about social adaptation, about being socially relevant, but it can be used in a myriad of creative ways when people are good at it. Meeting people's unconscious expectations for example (when combined with Ni), and using this for one's own benefit. Fe is common in popular culture and fashion.
    Whoops, forgot to hit reply.

  26. #466
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,019
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    you know socioncs is worthless when people suggest every type in the socion for one of the most public female of this planet. a useless theory with poorly defined metrics no one can adhere to
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  27. #467

    Join Date
    Aug 2022
    TIM
    EII
    Posts
    283
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don’t get how anyone can see her as any other type than EIE. She screams EIE, albeit perhaps a more introverted one, EIE-H maybe.

  28. #468
    The Chosen Prophet. Braingel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    TIM
    Ni-Fi-Ti link
    Posts
    5,013
    Mentioned
    248 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Only place Taylor has a chance of being EIE would be Model G.. But I think that school formally types her as an LSI-D or something (not that I agree it’s right at all).
    I am in my head; not society.

    Yes, that is who I am, hence the bold am.​ Also, a brain angel. (+ my own incarnation of a Zelda concept).


    My thoughts align w action to succeed what needs (at least in my dreamed ideal, they do)…


    Dragons:

    Babies, click them to make them grow up into Kara’s Dragon Museum



    My favorite adult Museum Exhibits

  29. #469
    The Chosen Prophet. Braingel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    TIM
    Ni-Fi-Ti link
    Posts
    5,013
    Mentioned
    248 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Virtually in all other models, Taylor Swift is a clear sensor. In the cognitive realm, there’s no way for an intuitive type.. As far as social role, a model like G that tries measure it, intuitive extrovert befits, because it’s primarily about social role and mission.


    Belief formation, cognition, this woman isn’t an intuitive… But most people only understand personality from social role and behavior on this site..
    I am in my head; not society.

    Yes, that is who I am, hence the bold am.​ Also, a brain angel. (+ my own incarnation of a Zelda concept).


    My thoughts align w action to succeed what needs (at least in my dreamed ideal, they do)…


    Dragons:

    Babies, click them to make them grow up into Kara’s Dragon Museum



    My favorite adult Museum Exhibits

  30. #470

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ren aeger View Post
    I don't think Taylor leads with extroverted feeling. It looks like it though, but I think that's apart of her brand. Her main form of confrontation is guilting; manipulating the narrative through her music, her style and her interviews, mobilizing and swaying peoples' emotions to get into their good graces, or at least, on her side. She was only (for a moment) outdone by a similarly overly dramatic SEE, Kanye West himself. Even that situation, she used to further herself. She directly confronted Katy Perry when Perry was the bigger pop girl and weaved together a good enough strategy to knock her off the top spot. She has admitted, in her music, to fear losing her high position to the next big pop girl. Taylor is most certainly a modestly dressed SEE with good management and lawyers, excellent PR and (perhaps overly-involved) stage parents who also have incredible backgrounds themselves.

    As a side-note, I think Selena Gomez is an ESI.
    What you described is Fe, so how can you say she doesn't lead with it?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tallmo View Post
    The bold part sounds very much like Fe, advanced Fe. Are you saying it's not? Fe is about social adaptation, about being socially relevant, but it can be used in a myriad of creative ways when people are good at it. Meeting people's unconscious expectations for example (when combined with Ni), and using this for one's own benefit. Fe is common in popular culture and fashion.
    Exactly, she has very strong and sophisticated use of Fe.

    Quote Originally Posted by Still Alive View Post
    you know socioncs is worthless when people suggest every type in the socion for one of the most public female of this planet. a useless theory with poorly defined metrics no one can adhere to
    Socionis is a flawed system, but the biggest issue in this site is that people type based on whether they like a celebrity or not. And if they resemble someone they know.

    Quote Originally Posted by Braingel View Post
    Virtually in all other models, Taylor Swift is a clear sensor. In the cognitive realm, there’s no way for an intuitive type.. As far as social role, a model like G that tries measure it, intuitive extrovert befits, because it’s primarily about social role and mission.


    Belief formation, cognition, this woman isn’t an intuitive… But most people only understand personality from social role and behavior on this site..
    She has Ne which comes out in her songs and in the music videos she directs, but her songwriting is extremely Si. It's all about sensations, the weather, the atmosphere.

  31. #471
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,019
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  32. #472
    Poptart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Location
    Same as it ever was
    Posts
    2,849
    Mentioned
    200 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    LOL

  33. #473
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,019
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Poptart View Post
    LOL
    People are shooting at him again. Weird country.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  34. #474
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,894
    Mentioned
    1609 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Still Alive View Post
    People are shooting at him again. Weird country.
    Actually, it was the secret service guys who did the shooting. They were shooting at some guy who poked an AK-47 through a fence at the golf course where Trump was playing.

    Man, you'd think these guys would know that an AK-47 is not effective at long ranges.

    https://viruscomix.com/page382.html

  35. #475
    Poptart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Location
    Same as it ever was
    Posts
    2,849
    Mentioned
    200 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Still Alive View Post
    People are shooting at him again. Weird country.
    Weirder than Germany?

  36. #476
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,894
    Mentioned
    1609 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Poptart View Post
    Weirder than Germany?
    In Germany, if you own a gun, you are expected to know how to use it properly.

  37. #477
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    5,019
    Mentioned
    280 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Poptart View Post
    Weirder than Germany?
    Probably yeah, although I don't have a lot of great things to say about germany either.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  38. #478
    Aster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    whatever you think
    Posts
    4,137
    Mentioned
    603 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I’m so sick of her at this point. She’s reach the Kardashian level of annoying. Actually I think it’s beyond that and I find Kim more likable than her. And this whole Travis Kelce thing is getting old. Ugh. Go away!
    ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈 ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈
    ♍︎ 𝓋𝒾𝓇𝑔𝑜 𝓇𝒾𝓈𝒾𝓃𝑔 ♍︎

  39. #479
    Aster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    whatever you think
    Posts
    4,137
    Mentioned
    603 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Honestly I’m in the camp that her and Travis are in a fake publicity relationship and both are really reaping the benefits. Very Beta, she is.
    ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈 ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈
    ♍︎ 𝓋𝒾𝓇𝑔𝑜 𝓇𝒾𝓈𝒾𝓃𝑔 ♍︎

Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 289101112

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •