Give me some ideas what information this is related to?

[mu4]

i always think to myself "WHY HE DID THIS" not "how he did this"
when you starting to look
at why's
you notice much more
its much deeper
than you actually see
somebody can act flirty
and there is the reason why he is like that
maybe he is not a big flirt in general
somebody can act depressed
and be totally happy
but why he acts this way?

Give me some ideas what information this is related to?

[12345]

Fi? It may depend on the context.

[mu4]

Fi? It may depend on the context.

why static?

what is being described is dynamic?

Mood, motive, change

Why is it ethics of relations, Attraction, repulsion?

Fi is responsible for understanding the quality, nature, and proper maintenance of personal relations; makes moral judgments; and aspires to humanism and kindness. Fi has a strong understanding of the social hierarchy and how people feel about each other, their attitudes of like or dislike, enthrallment or disgust, repulsion or attraction, enmity or friendship.

[12345]

"WHY HE DID THIS" not "how he did this"

Relation
Object

understanding the (...) nature (...) of personal relations

However, like i said, I'm not sure.

[mu4]

Relation
Object

However, like i said, I'm not sure.

It's ethical I think, but relation?

The why being suggested I don't see as attraction or repulsion.

"somebody can act flirty
and there is the reason why he is like that"

"somebody can act depressed
and be totally happy"

"but why he acts this way?"

Is the context something like this? I don't see any qualities described below being shown.

Fi is responsible for understanding the quality, nature, and proper maintenance of personal relations; makes moral judgments; and aspires to humanism and kindness. Fi has a strong understanding of the social hierarchy and how people feel about each other, their attitudes of like or dislike, enthrallment or disgust, repulsion or attraction, enmity or friendship.

But other qualities are being shown. Words are being used to describe, "Flirty, depressed, happy".

[Gilly]

Ni and/or Fe.

To rephrase: instead of "why did he do this?" think "What was his goal in doing this?" or "What internal state at that moment caused him to behave in such a way?"

[tereg]

Sounds mainly to me

[mu4]

Sounds mainly to me

What relationships/attraction/repulsion is being discussed?

[tereg]

What relationships/attraction/repulsion is being discussed?

It is the relationship between, or the linkage of the speculated motivation of certain actions of a person other than yourself to what it actually is. It seeks to understand a motivation that is foreign to oneself, but open to accepting it once it is understood. The person who tries to and succeeds in understanding the foreign motivation (and accepts the rationale) feels a deeper sense of bond through a sense of emotional discovery.

Edit: Another example would be gaining an understanding of an action that is foreign to oneself, but is perhaps more skeptical of its rationale. Repulsion comes when the rationale does not fall in line with their code of ethics. Hence, the motivation might be understood, but it does not satisfy the person's ethics.

[mu4]

It is the relationship between, or the linkage of the speculated motivation of certain actions of a person other than yourself to what it actually is. It seeks to understand a motivation that is foreign to oneself, but open to accepting it once it is understood. The person who tries to and succeeds in understanding the foreign motivation feels a deeper sense of bond through a sense of emotional discovery.

The bold is not being verbalized, you're reading into it a bit and I think thru your own ego elements.

As far as as how motivations(emotions) are recognized and discovered verses assessment of closeness, likes and dislikes, it is described as thus below.

Extroverted ethics is generally associated with the ability to recognize and convey (i.e. make others experience) passions, moods, and emotional states, generate excitement, liveliness, and feelings.

Introverted ethics is generally associated with the ability to gain an implicit sense of the subjective 'distance' between two people, and make judgments based off of said thing.

Also, these types convey emotions in terms of how they were affected by something (such as "I did not like that"), rather than an Fe approach that would describe the object itself without clear reference to the subject involved (such as "That sucked").

[tereg]

The bold is not being verbalized, you're reading into it a bit and I think thru your own ego elements.

What I'm saying is that the motivation itself to understand another person's motivations is largely to compare it to one's own code of ethics or standards. I was simply trying to respond to why the process is done in the first place (to understand so that we can either appreciate the gain in knowledge and empathy or gain clarity of the rationale to better be able to compare with an internal ethic -- to which it can either be accepted or rejected).

[mu4]

Another example would be gaining an understanding of an action that is foreign to oneself, but is perhaps more skeptical of its rationale. Repulsion comes when the rationale does not fall in line with their code of ethics. Hence, the motivation might be understood, but it does not satisfy the person's ethics.

Understanding something that is foreign to oneself.

This seems somehow more object oriented, the object being the foreign object that is not oneself. And the perception of that internal fluctuation within that person.

Where as is described as internal as well as a field and the distance between two people as assessed by oneself.

[iAnnAu]

All that stood out to me is that it sounds almost exactly how Merky posts. Blunt but tentative, jumping around but impatient to get to the point. I wondered if you took just phrases out of a larger dialogue?

ETA: It also just occurred to me that it looks like it was lifted out of an AIM chat or something. I've noticed people tend to communicate in chat very differently than otherwise ...

[tereg]

Understanding something that is foreign to oneself.

This seems somehow more object oriented, the object being the foreign object that is not oneself. And the perception of that internal fluctuation within that person.

This is why I think what is in the OP is static in nature. The thing that is being analyzed and understood is an "object" called "the motivation".

Where as is described as internal as well as a field and the distance between two people as assessed by oneself.

Right. The processing of the understanding is a rather internal process. You are relying on your own intuition and experience to build and recreate something that you initially do not understand. The closer you can get to recreating the actual object and its primary building blocks, the more understanding you start to gain from it.

[crazedrat]

I think that it is Ne valuing and weak Ni, and directed toward compensating for weak Ni; with Fe in the ego somewhere.