This is not the real thing, necessarily. Sure God is more than a personality type, but let's not disclude it from argument all too easily. Try to build a convincing argument as to why God is the type you picked. Explain your point through references like the Bible or other general teachings.


Reply With Quote
-ish, and that the frequent defining of god through the use of aphorisms may point at a dynamic nature, probably
, so I am all for ILI. I think an
valuing type would have created multiple universes and realities to test and play with all sorts of unimaginable things, but I have never heard an account of god doing this. What points to an Ip temperament is many accounts of god being unhappy with this reality and flooding the earth - instead of bothering to go through the appropriate paperwork, peer review and waiting period required to build another reality, god basically just said 'fuck it' and decided to see how this one panned out instead, probably thinking that if it was watered, it might grow into something better, as if Earth was a plant or something.




--> perhaps Normalizing 

(as per tcaudilllg)
I thought the concept of god as something less concrete because if that apparently imaginary stuff (=god and this is not saying that I took atheistic stance) that can materialize itself to whatever and therefore can not have absolute initial and preferred form. I admit that I'm taking huge leaps.
