niffweed is LII thread split

[Subteigh]

yeah this is true, my point is weak there. The situation has too much variation. It'd be the way they went about it not the result.

How can the situation have too much variation if you are an ENTp???

[ArchonAlarion]

lollllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllll

I meant that people are too varied for me to say "Ti-ers are always consistent when making ethical judgements on forums".

Gah why do you misinterpret me so much!

[Subteigh]

lollllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllll

I meant that people are too varied for me to say "Ti-ers are always consistent when making ethical judgements on forums".

Gah why do you misinterpret me so much!

I don't believe I do. It's just that if you are not clear about what you mean, there could be many interpretations of what you do mean.

[ArchonAlarion]

stop supervising me.

You must love picking apart what I say cuz you do it so much.

[Subteigh]

You are quite entitled to base your typological method on your feelings towards other individuals if you want, but I would suggest it's not always for the best to constantly second-guess the motives of others. Wouldn't it be better to find qualities which can be observed independently of the observer?

[ArchonAlarion]

Yeah lol, didn't I say the very same thing a few posts back??

I'm not free of such typing, although I understand it is useless for convincing others.

[ArchonAlarion]

lol sure.

So should I describe ISFj's as good for nothing prudeish assholes next time i post about them in a thread?

You can use that argument for anything SubT.

However, unless your entire typological method is going to center around your feelings towards other types (something I'd expect an Fi-er to do) and never try to find qualities which can be observed no matter observing type, than ya better change your attitude about that.

There we go ^^