My turn! :D

[sarinana]

Ethical Intuitive Introvert

I'm sorry I'm not good at VIing, however I've been thinking about this more, off and on, and you really come off as Delta and fit the dichotomies and such of an EII just looking at forum writings.

I'd like to know more about what you think about that typing though, because I'm curious of the reasons you wouldn't think EII. I really can't say enneagram has as much of an influence on this as the socionics related categories do. There are a lot of stupid associations that I'm not taking into account.

I can see why one would say SEE because of dichotomies and associations, but I think you're Ne/Si, Ne ego, probably Delta, so I'm guessing EII as the most likely. Maybe your certainty of enneagram type (7w8) would account for you being an Ne subtype. I have my reasons for not assuming ILE or IEE over EII, but I'm not discounting them. I also don't feel that EIIs simply fit the stereotype of reserved. They can be very gregarious and people-pleasing so to speak.

well I don't think I could be EII in any way...
I just made a video..... but I won't post it here since I look like I'm on drugs.... I just can't sit still for more than 15s

[mu4]

I think the chances of her being EII is between 0 and negative 0.

[munenori2]

I think the chances of her being EII is between 0 and negative 0.

Yeah, me too

[717495]

It must just be the fact that I'm trying to use dichotomies, at least the one's that most people use. I typed myself with dichotomies and got ESI, which is pushing it as well. There is also a good chance I don't know how to assume these dichotomies in others.

[sarinana]

lol I first said you looked IXFp in the members pic thread, Sarinana!

Then I switched to ESFp during a chatbox convo...

Now I remember why I typed IXFp... damnit.

OK OK OK. You know I am not sure how ISFps commune with LSEs. But fuck im giving all my ex bfs to do the socionics test and I always curse when they turn out to be LSEs. seems like all my boyfriends were either IEIs or LSEs. I MUST be gamma.

[sarinana]

not unlike with the user Allie, i initially gave SEE some consideration. but going by your posts overall, you don't seem to have the sensory awareness of Se subtypes and you seem to go for Fe more than Fi subtypes. my best guess is IEI and Conflictor attractions are not implausible over further psychological distance.

You know I may upset you with this... But what I say that doesn't mean I actually mean it. And if I am nice to everybody on here (actually not to everybody) that doesn't mean I value Fe. Fe I consider as annoying.
And conflictor attractions???? I DON'T have any conflicts with LSEs. But I have no respect for them since they listen to me like little puppies. That's it.

[717495]

I did say I thought you fit the SEE dichotomies as well. But according to you, you think you're IEE? I don't really have an opinion about that. I don't see S over N, N over S. I was just referring to those other dichotomies. I think E is over I. F is over T. P is over J.

[sarinana]

I did say I thought you fit the SEE dichotomies as well. But according to you, you think you're IEE? I don't really have an opinion about that. I don't see S over N, N over S. I was just referring to those other dichotomies.

I type myself SEE....

[717495]

I type myself SEE....

Ah ok. Then I'm getting better at this

I came to your type of SEE because from but a few posts I could already see Strategic over Tactical, Process over Result, Static over Dynamic. I know I said EII, but they have the same dichotomies.

[717495]

Oh then nevermind. I thought a typing session is what this is.

[sarinana]

as far as LSE, just sounds like you prefer Ni/Se, and i don't think what you say here is necessary of sufficient for valuing Fe, but have you understood Hidden Agedna and POLR yet?

No.... But I don't care.. type me as you will.

[mu4]

No.... But I don't care.. type me as you will.

Hm.

[sarinana]

Hm.

what? he has this right..

[mu4]

what? he has this right..

Yes, I wholeheartedly support this right.

I just wanted to smile a bit.

[sarinana]

Yes, I wholeheartedly support this right.

I just wanted to smile a bit.

nice.... i like smile full of irony.

[mu4]

Are you anemic? If you are I will smile more for you.

[sarinana]

no... im schizophrenic...

[mu4]

no... im schizophrenic...

Oh is that who you're smiling at?