ILIs-INTps what are you like in bed?

[Jarno]

I'm quite good in bed, though I am not ILI. So why am I posting in this topic?

LOL DUNNO

I remember that ESI's make good facials...

[Creepy-male]

Sounds great, but don't you guys live on opposite sides of the continent?

Not any more :3 I've been here in Perth for like, a month.

[Creepy-male]

B-but, I thought she lived in Sydney...whuh? You two are trying to screw with my brain.

No, I'm trying to screw with your brain. Don't drag Isha into my mind-bending hijinks any more than she already is

[Khamelion]

I guess I'll be the first one.

- I like to experiment and try new things (as long as I feel comfortable with a partner)
- Nothing is immoral or taboo
- I can't have sex with someone I don't know well. I won't be able to relax. I will be too worried about my performance. I will be too worried about not knowing what my partner likes/wants. For this reason I don't like casual sex or one night stands.
- Number one priority is to please a partner
- I don't like to talk or express my feelings during sex. No moaning, grunting, yelling, screaming and announcing what's about to happen.
- I like to dominate and submit at the same time. Some sessions I am more active, some sessions I am more passive. Some sessions it's both, but in the end it works out to 50-50. I won't be with a girl who's always dominating and I won't be with a girl who's always submissive.

/highfive

[Beautiful sky]

This thread is like a train expecting to reach its destination without any problems or delays. Except someone messed up the track switching and ended up pitting the train going full speed towards another train going full speed with absolutely no way to stop them both in enough time.

It's disappointing because the train won't reached its destination as expected. But its interesting because it continues to hurl itself to an irreconcilable fate of calamity and destruction, a variation of occurrence perpetually feeding the constant need to watch the "train wreck".

So you see, it's all in good fun .
Keep the good timez za rollin'.

*As an aside, DiscoJoe can watch me poop anytime.

Edit: Oh, and I enjoy going down on women so if that doesn't make me INTp then what type would you propose Maritsa? Unless you propose SEE in which case I will know you are definitely making a good recreational event of your internet forum time.

Interesting logic...I decline SEE typing for you...I don't get any Se at all...No INTp either. Tic Tac Tic Tac... nice association...interesting. You are right, it no longer makes you INTp.

[thePirate]

LETS JUST SAY AFTER AIXELSYD I CANT READ WORDS RIGHT

[thePirate]

That's cuz I'm a total mind fuck.

literally

[Beautiful sky]

Snoring like a pig. A fat one.

Funny you said that; I don't mind when my mom does; I can sleep in an earthquake and not notice.

[Theta]

No: should this question not be answered by SEE's? not?

[Aiss]

^ SEEs have lives, and so have dualized ILIs.

[Theta]

^ SEEs have lives, and so have dualized ILIs.

So instead we gather infos of unsuccessful relationships in order to know how dualized ILI's are not in bed?
Meaning that everyone posting should be taken as an example what not to do in bed.

Genious

[nanashi]

I asked 30 college students to be morphologically typed and assessed the MBTI to them; most scored within quadra but not their own type in the MBTI; so you can see it is possible that in MBTI I scored my dual's type.

Second, I am right about ILI's sexual behavior; at least one has not presented themselves with anything differently and if you find an exception that matches with VI, that would be a miracle.

Um...."going down" is just a sexual move or position. It's a nice one to have in one's repertoire. Sex can feel more fluid and organic and in the moment if the same boring pattern isn't used all of the time, so having different moves/positions can keep a great experience from seeming boringly rehearsed. ILIs on this forum keep repeating what has already been written about them: they like to try new things.

Maritsa, what you may have been dealing with was A)an ILI discomfort with a non-democratic presentation of the sexual power dynamics in going down (a weird perception of a female servicing her partner as her being submissive) or B) a young ILI's disgust with something they use all the time like their mouth (which is rife with bacteria) and the "secret" nether regions...carriers of warts and the like. This ILI may be new to sex and need some time to feel creative, but that desire can still manifest itself, and it's not like they'd necessarily broadcast it to you:"Hey! I decided I'll receive/perform oral now!!"


Anyway, to say an ESFP would never become a monk in a silent order, even though you've personally talked to 5 ESFPs who say it would disgust/terrify them to do so, is putting all people who are ESFP into a box. You can say they're unlikely to go that route in your opinion, but there are situations in which an ESFP could do so. I personally know an INTp with sexual practices nearly identical to mine and one with a very different history. Culture and exposure to ideas and comfort with intimacy and liking your partner go a long way in influencing people.

[Beautiful sky]

Um...."going down" is just a sexual move or position. It's a nice one to have in one's repertoire. Sex can feel more fluid and organic and in the moment if the same boring pattern isn't used all of the time, so having different moves/positions can keep a great experience from seeming boringly rehearsed. ILIs on this forum keep repeating what has already been written about them: they like to try new things.

Maritsa, what you may have been dealing with was A)an ILI discomfort with a non-democratic presentation of the sexual power dynamics in going down (a weird perception of a female servicing her partner as her being submissive) or B) a young ILI's disgust with something they use all the time like their mouth (which is rife with bacteria) and the "secret" nether regions...carriers of warts and the like. This ILI may be new to sex and need some time to feel creative, but that desire can still manifest itself, and it's not like they'd necessarily broadcast it to you:"Hey! I decided I'll receive/perform oral now!!"


Anyway, to say an ESFP would never become a monk in a silent order, even though you've personally talked to 5 ESFPs who say it would disgust/terrify them to do so, is putting all people who are ESFP into a box. You can say they're unlikely to go that route in your opinion, but there are situations in which an ESFP could do so. I personally know an INTp with sexual practices nearly identical to mine and one with a very different history. Culture and exposure to ideas and comfort with intimacy and liking your partner go a long way in influencing people.

I believe that they are far more conservative then they "act". And your openness with this topics puts you in Alpha
Will you review the functions and see where in Socionics you are likely to fit, please. I feel that you don't fit into Gamma, because you value Si which you openly express in the above paragraphs.

Gammas value pragmatic/work/ Ni things over touch/sensory pleasures/Si things.

[nanashi]

This is talking about sex without an slant.

[silverchris9]

I may have posted this already, but presumably a "sexually experienced" SEE would encourage their ILI partner to, ahem, "try new things" on a fairly regular basis.