View Poll Results: Do you have favourable interactions?

Voters
20. You may not vote on this poll
  • Alpha: Yes, Ephemeros

    0 0%
  • Alpha: Yes, hkkmr

    3 15.00%
  • Non-Alpha: Yes, Ephemeros

    0 0%
  • Non-Alpha: Yes, hkkmr

    0 0%
  • Alpha: Yes, both

    0 0%
  • Non-Alpha: Yes, both.

    0 0%
  • Soylent Greens

    2 10.00%
  • I'm SubT

    15 75.00%
Results 1 to 39 of 39

Thread: SRS Are they in our Quadra?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Creepy-male

    Default [SRS] Are they in our Quadra?

    Votevotevote.

    CONCLUSIVE Te DATA GATHERING FOR MAXIMAL OPTIMUM TRUTHFUL.

    EDIT

    Could someone with the POWAH to do so add "Alpha: No, neither" and "Non-Alpha: No, neither"?

  2. #2
    Enlightened Hedonist
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    18,373
    Mentioned
    447 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Those options are already covered aren't they?

  3. #3
    Pretend like it's the weekend Banana Pancakes's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    your backyard
    Posts
    798
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    um...options need to be tweaked

    yes epher, no hkkmr
    and
    no epher, yes hkkmr

    need to be in there, or allow multiple choice
    ILE-Ti
    6w7 sx/sp (low level of confidence)

  4. #4
    Enlightened Hedonist
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    18,373
    Mentioned
    447 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hang on, is the bit before the colon the quadra of the person being asked? Or the quadra you think they are in?

  5. #5
    Pretend like it's the weekend Banana Pancakes's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    your backyard
    Posts
    798
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Subterranean View Post
    Hang on, is the bit before the colon the quadra of the person being asked? Or the quadra you think they are in?
    oh, if it's asking "your quadra: get along with person?", that makes more sense actually.

    edit: even then, there's not a "no, neither" option.

    Multiple choice is the solution here.

    Alpha: Yes Eph
    Alpha: Yes Hkk
    Alpha: No Eph
    Alpha: No Hkk
    duplicate for Non Alpha
    ILE-Ti
    6w7 sx/sp (low level of confidence)

  6. #6
    tereg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    TIM
    EII/INFj
    Posts
    4,680
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    wat
    INFj

    9w1 sp/sx

  7. #7
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    7,791
    Mentioned
    205 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Lots of cases on the forum are borderline, but the only person I can say without a shred of doubt is not Alpha is niffweed17.

    Zero Ti valuing.
    Zero Ne valuing.
    Zero Si valuing.
    Zero Fe valuing.

    In my entire life, out of every single person I've ever met, he's the only one that manages to contradict almost every aspect of Alpha in some way. I'm even sure this is a compliment to him.

    hoodrat is more likely than niffweed to be Alpha.

  8. #8
    Sauron, The Great Enemy ArchonAlarion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    TIM
    Yet to be determined
    Posts
    4,411
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Nah. Once you understand a definition of something to be "does not like emotions" or some shit, its pretty effing easy to go around being a overly critical jerk, as if you don't like emotional expression. Its apparent online, but having met Niffweed irl, I can say with even greater confidence that he is an IJ temperament infantile, and when him and I had an interesting conversation away from the group the entire discussion was framed in Ti dissection and categorization.

    Even then, most of you fail to realize that Fe has nothing to do with what Niff thinks it does, and neither does the Ni/Se dichotomy. If you ask the Alpha NT's here I'm sure most if not all will also dislike things normally attributed to Fe like being a loud manipulative cry baby and an ethical sell-out.

    He exudes no Se, and I'm quite positive he would neither enjoy an ESFp (like Hoodrat) nor would his quirky random dry humor and overtly critical nature elate an ESFp. In fact, they would likely grow tired of him quickly and find his antics obnoxious. I certainly do not, because he's a lovable zany Alpha NT, who is just being a spiteful 5w6 mad at the world for its various misdeeds and now hes walled himself up behind a mountain of "objectivity" and "facts" for fear of letting go and putting himself out there. Its pretty freakin obvious.

    Not that I dislike Niff personally nor do I think he's a moron, but I feel he has stuck himself into a false persona based on other psychological factors that have absolutely nothing to do with gamma or socionics.

    Zero Ni valuing
    Zero Te valuing
    Zero Fi valuing
    Zero Se valuing (the most apparent one)

    Niffweed is as Alpha as it gets, and one day, you'll understand that.

    /threadjack counter-attack
    The end is nigh

  9. #9
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    7,791
    Mentioned
    205 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Archon, I was trying before to give your understanding the maximum benefit of the doubt, but you just lost my respect with this one post. You have absolutely no right to assume anything about which dogma or beliefs about socionics I'm bringing into a discussion before you hear them. Much of your argument is a strawman fallacy as a result.

    Quote Originally Posted by ArchonAlarion View Post
    Nah. Once you understand a definition of something to be "does not like emotions" or some shit, its pretty effing easy to go around being a overly critical jerk, as if you don't like emotional expression. Its apparent online, but having met Niffweed irl, I can say with even greater confidence that he is an IJ temperament infantile, and when him and I had an interesting conversation away from the group the entire discussion was framed in Ti dissection and categorization.
    I never said Fe-polr had anything to do with disliking emotions. Ever. The rest of what you wrote w/ regards to that is correspondingly false. I haven't met him so I can't comment on his temperament. But even if he were IJ, I'd sooner consider ESI for him than LII.

    Even then, most of you fail to realize that Fe has nothing to do with what Niff thinks it does, and neither does the Ni/Se dichotomy. If you ask the Alpha NT's here I'm sure most if not all will also dislike things normally attributed to Fe like being a loud manipulative cry baby and an ethical sell-out.
    I dislike most things attributed to Fe, so I know this. You're not telling me anything I'm not already aware of. Nowhere was this ever a criterion for my typing or any typing I've ever constructed for anybody.

    He exudes no Se, and I'm quite positive he would neither enjoy an ESFp (like Hoodrat) nor would his quirky random dry humor and overtly critical nature elate an ESFp. In fact, they would likely grow tired of him quickly and find his antics obnoxious. I certainly do not, because he's a lovable zany Alpha NT, who is just being a spiteful 5w6 mad at the world for its various misdeeds and now hes walled himself up behind a mountain of "objectivity" and "facts" for fear of letting go and putting himself out there. Its pretty freakin obvious.
    No it's no pretty freakin obvious. Why the hell would you think an Se superid is strong in Se? Please give me a logical justification before I take you seriously. Model A and Jung's justifications are pretty straightforward as to why Se wouldn't be very strong in an Ni ego, but please do provide your reasoning.

    cpig doesn't exude very much Se either, and neither does dolphin fwiw.

    Additionally, I find your entire method of basing a typing entirely on niffweed's unhealthy characteristics demonstrative of a belittling attitude towards both niffweed and LIIs that you probably picked up elsewhere, and not likely to lead to any good and objective typing.

    Not that I dislike Niff personally nor do I think he's a moron, but I feel he has stuck himself into a false persona based on other psychological factors that have absolutely nothing to do with gamma or socionics.

    Zero Ni valuing
    Zero Te valuing
    Zero Fi valuing
    Zero Se valuing (the most apparent one)

    Niffweed is as Alpha as it gets, and one day, you'll understand that.

    /threadjack counter-attack
    He exudes absolutely no Ti. Virtually no Ne. He exudes Te, Ni and possibly unhealthy levels of Fi.

    But yeah, he's gotta be Ti ego because he creates rigid constructs about things and doesn't vary his system of objective facts.

  10. #10
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carla View Post
    I love you, jxrtes.
    Fuck you, I'm his wife.

  11. #11
    Creepy-male

    Default

    No.

    Sharign isn't caring </3

    You never cared about me!

  12. #12
    Pretend like it's the weekend Banana Pancakes's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    your backyard
    Posts
    798
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carla View Post
    Fuck you, learn to share.
    ILE-Ti
    6w7 sx/sp (low level of confidence)

  13. #13
    Sauron, The Great Enemy ArchonAlarion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    TIM
    Yet to be determined
    Posts
    4,411
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes View Post
    Archon, I was trying before to give your understanding the maximum benefit of the doubt, but you just lost my respect with this one post. You have absolutely no right to assume anything about which dogma or beliefs about socionics I'm bringing into a discussion before you hear them. Much of your argument is a strawman fallacy as a result.
    You are not the only one who thinks him to be ILI. Your post was preaching to the choir and I wasn't going to let my opinions go unsaid. I never specified YOU (as in Jrxtes) and my post was addressed to anyone who cares.

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes View Post
    I never said Fe-polr had anything to do with disliking emotions. Ever. The rest of what you wrote w/ regards to that is correspondingly false. I haven't met him so I can't comment on his temperament. But even if he were IJ, I'd sooner consider ESI for him than LII.
    Once again, did not specify you, I was addressing things which are in fact quite commonly cited as the behavior of Fe-ers.

    And how the fuck is Niffweed anything like any ISFj's here?

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes View Post
    I dislike most things attributed to Fe, so I know this. You're not telling me anything I'm not already aware of. Nowhere was this ever a criterion for my typing or any typing I've ever constructed for anybody.
    Yup, was making an opening argument for Niff's type, not specifically arguing against what you said, partly because you did not give an argument.

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes View Post
    No it's no pretty freakin obvious. Why the hell would you think an Se superid is strong in Se? Please give me a logical justification before I take you seriously. Model A and Jung's justifications are pretty straightforward as to why Se wouldn't be very strong in an Ni ego, but please do provide your reasoning.
    Ni is complementary to Se. I am of the opinion that you do in fact use Se as an Ni vauler. This "strong" "weak" dichotomy is misleading. I want you to look at the posts of Strrrng, bulletsanddoves, crazedrat, and Capitalistpig. Also look at FDG's and Ashton's posts (on socionix) or how they speak/type in stickam or w/e.

    There is a very very very very very very very very very obvious difference.

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes View Post
    cpig doesn't exude very much Se either, and neither does dolphin fwiw.
    Depends on your definition of Se first off, and from mine, they do.

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes View Post
    Additionally, I find your entire method of basing a typing entirely on niffweed's unhealthy characteristics demonstrative of a belittling attitude towards both niffweed and LIIs that you probably picked up elsewhere, and not likely to lead to any good and objective typing.
    I am not belittling him. I am pointing out what I see. If I'm not allowed to speak freely than wtf do you want me to say? People have issues. I have issues, you probably have some issues, everyone has issues and this will lead to negative circumstances.

    How have I belittled LII's? I love LIIs. I want Niff to choose LII because I think it would help him and I like when people are happy =\

    There is nothing purposefully mean-spirited about my argument.

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes View Post
    He exudes absolutely no Ti. Virtually no Ne. He exudes Te, Ni and possibly unhealthy levels of Fi.
    Nope, dont see that.

    Quote Originally Posted by jxrtes View Post
    But yeah, he's gotta be Ti ego because he creates rigid constructs about things and doesn't vary his system of objective facts.
    When did I say that? I said that when actually having a conversation with the dude, he spoke just like me, framing everything into nice boxes of Ti and separating information in a way I understood easily. Like, tbh, I felt very excited at the meet, and often it feels like I have to drag my feet through the mud to get anywhere in a discussion with people, but the concepts we spoke of seemed (on my side, at least) to be integrated rapidly.


    I'm refusing to bow down to shame and fear of being ostracized for what I see.
    The end is nigh

  14. #14
    Sauron, The Great Enemy ArchonAlarion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    TIM
    Yet to be determined
    Posts
    4,411
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I <3 Carla.

    If it wasn't for Simon, I'd marry you.
    The end is nigh

  15. #15
    Moderator xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Miniluv
    Posts
    7,791
    Mentioned
    205 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ArchonAlarion View Post
    You are not the only one who thinks him to be ILI. Your post was preaching to the choir and I wasn't going to let my opinions go unsaid. I never specified YOU (as in Jrxtes) and my post was addressed to anyone who cares.

    Once again, did not specify you, I was addressing things which are in fact quite commonly cited as the behavior of Fe-ers.
    Funny you say that, because this comment seemed directed at me...

    Niffweed is as Alpha as it gets, and one day, you'll understand that.


    But if the rest of your post was directed at "commonly cited arguments," very well then.

    And how the fuck is Niffweed anything like any ISFj's here?
    He isn't, which is the point, because it's still more likely than LII if he has IJ temperament.

    Ni is complementary to Se. I am of the opinion that you do in fact use Se as an Ni vauler. This "strong" "weak" dichotomy is misleading. I want you to look at the posts of Strrrng, bulletsanddoves, crazedrat, and Capitalistpig. Also look at FDG's and Ashton's posts (on socionix) or how they speak/type in stickam or w/e.
    Prove why the dichotomy is misleading. You're contradicting many people's observations, so please provide some validation of your assertion. Give me some proof why I should listen to you over theirs and my own observations.

    I don't believe any of the aforementioned people have strong Se. strrrng and crazedrat acted like assholes, but that doesn't make them strong in Se. B&D writes posts to shock people but that doesn't make him very strong in Se either. Why do you believe they have strong Se?

    Ashton may certainly be Se ego or has a strong Se agenda. I haven't read enough of FDG's material to say anything about him.

    There is a very very very very very very very very very obvious difference.
    I think cpig and niff have a lot in common actually. I even thought their intonation was kind of similar, if that means anything.

    Depends on your definition of Se first off, and from mine, they do.
    My definition of Se is both conceptual (I could go into some detail if you want) and social/behavioral, and I believe niffweed very much satisfies both criteria.

    I am not belittling him. I am pointing out what I see. If I'm not allowed to speak freely than wtf do you want me to say? People have issues. I have issues, you probably have some issues, everyone has issues and this will lead to negative circumstances.

    How have I belittled LII's? I love LIIs. I want Niff to choose LII because I think it would help him and I like when people are happy =\

    There is nothing purposefully mean-spirited about my argument.
    You're typing someone based on some alleged fucking neuroses, and you don't think that's offensive!!? You're making presumptions about his type based largely on your impression of his negative traits. Although it's true you're typing him based on a connection you made, but the rest of your argument is about how Ti manifests in him as "hiding behind a wall of objectivity" -- this is not healthy behaviour for any type and shouldn't be a criterion.

    Having good intentions means nothing if you don't bring objective facts to bear.

    When did I say that? I said that when actually having a conversation with the dude, he spoke just like me, framing everything into nice boxes of Ti and separating information in a way I understood easily. Like, tbh, I felt very excited at the meet, and often it feels like I have to drag my feet through the mud to get anywhere in a discussion with people, but the concepts we spoke of seemed (on my side, at least) to be integrated rapidly.
    Ever considered that you're both Ni ego, and that related types process information into "neat little boxes" for each others' comprehension?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •