Intellect in SLE-Se and SLE-Ti (ESTp)
Do you think SLE-Ti is more intellectual than SLE-Se? That is, do you think Ti subtypes read more, are more open to intellectual pursuits and are more likely to take on a career which requires an intellectual capacity (e.g. law) than Se subtypes?
Or do you think it's entirely unrelated to subtype, and that all SLEs can either be thick as pig shit or incredibly intelligent?
LOL @ the last question!!!Originally Posted by Ezra
You know, it's strange... The really smart SLEs I know are all Ti subtype... The Se subtype ones I know are all just typical dudes you see at the gym... Young, dumb, and full of... steroids
Is intellectuality even type related?
has some correlation with logic and intuition
lol this thread. Ive known very smart, intelligent SLE-Se
In theory, -Ti subtype is most likely to be inclined at having a deep interest towards managerial, strategy, math, etc.
However, this mainly is because that they are eager to be in touch with their contact rather than inert elements.
Typology Diagnostic Service
Typology Discord Server
Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: "The history of the world is none other than the progress of the consciousness of freedom."
In terms of classic IQ shit, yes I think the Ti subtype is smarter. Though, you can be smarter in stealing cars and beating people, so...
Trump's Se was smart enough for him to become the president of the USA, with little Ti logic
(I type him SLE-Se)
Let's say he stole the president's seat. Does that make sense? He is smart, he just isn't smart in a book smart way. That's what I was talking about.
I don't think he really stole it for his first term. He did try for the second term, yea.
I've known book smart SLE-Se too (the one I referred to in my earlier post).
Nah, I don't mean that he literally stole the election. Like if I stole a young girl's heart, it doesn't mean that I ripped it out and took it to my mancave.
Oh yeah, this one SLE journalist star could be an SLE-Se, so yeah, it's possible. It's just that the Ti subtype is more likely to be more intellectual.
Same.
Producing subtypes in general are usually more well-rounded
Left is Ti-subtype, right is Se-subtype
I dated both
I like both SLEs
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Intellect isn't related to information metabolism or subtypes, dumbass.
I don't divide subtypes so sharply or completely to be able to say that one is more prone to anything than another for the most part. It's like something that goes backwards, but can't go forwards. So an SLE obsessed with law, you could say "that's because you're the Ti subtype" (when it's one thing among many that points to "Ti subtype"). But if you try to go the other way and say "is law obsession a Ti subtype thing" I don't think it works very well.
Last edited by marooned; 05-06-2009 at 02:19 PM.
Everybody knows SLE's are lowbrow brutes with small, mean piercing eyes and overlarge muscles they use to coerce and beat sweet innocent people into a pulp with if others don't do as they say. Their idea of "intellect" is to muse which spot hurts the most when they apply the taser to bend people to their will...
>_O
INFp
If your sea chart does not match reality, go with reality (Old mariner saying)
I thought those were LSEs.
Them too eh? O_<
This socionics stuff is too easy.
INFp
If your sea chart does not match reality, go with reality (Old mariner saying)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
