Thanks Gully.
Thanks Gully.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
The above two posts by Brill:
"Why ESEs should never try to sound smart: And introductory essay."
Do you see the right to be negative? not every thing is fine and dandy, there for you do have the right to be negative.
In any case where one is acting negative there must be a reason why, no? I think as long as one can see the reason to being negative then it has subjective meaning behind it...Then it's okay?
.... hmm hope it does not seem i'm just talking out of my ass...
MBTI - ISTP
SOCIONICS - SLI
"Perhaps it is I who understand best why man alone laughs. He suffers so great that he had to invent laughter." - Friedrich Nietzsche
At least our personality isn't one big screwup
j/k
*hugs*
Best Supervisees in the socion <3
Aww, thanks. K, now don't touch me.
Last edited by Park; 04-15-2009 at 03:16 AM.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
I don't see any reason why one couldn't "move" from ENFj to ESFj. I've just observed the opposite to be more common and more intuitively useful. I'm very happy if you can confirm that the opposite has happened to you.
As for static types with transblocks, they are not central to my way of thinking, no.
First eliminate every possible source of error. Thence success is inevitable.
They still exist in the articles section, yes. In the same thread as always. "Easy-to-use something something."
Negativism-positivism is much more difficult to observe through the net. It's easy in personal contact, but I can't see your face or your gestures. Mostly you seem like... "limiting" to me, though, but that's just my best guess. (That is, abstract subtype of negative or concrete subtype of positive).
First eliminate every possible source of error. Thence success is inevitable.
I went through a period of soul-searching and confrontationality. And I'm here, now.
I'm going to fall back on my default "Ask Brill" response though.
The suggestion of ENFj came originally from me reading this:
Gulanzon's LiveJournal
(Yeah, I read the whole four years. I only suggested Beta for some of it.)
^ Cast into the crowd for general bickering and/or independent study.
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
On the negativist and ISTp thing. I know little about this dichotomy, but here is how I see it happening IRL.
Myself and an ISTp who i've became quite good friends with of late. It's eery in the sense that he and I have experienced almost identical situations in life, and in similar situations, exactly the same thing happens to us.
We've had a lot of knocks and the shit just seems to keep hitting the fan. Now this-the situations, depresses the both of us: but each time we repeat something we are always optimistic that this time it will be good. We always look for the positives in a bad situation and even when we get stuff off our respective chests to each other, he and I always look to end it on a bright note, even if that involves some little bit of philosophising.
Also, we tend to put on a good face in times of adversity (which maybe some people confuse with Fe PoLR- lack of emotions, in this instance towards the negative impending doom stuff. There is always something that can be done, always something to take from the situation, even when things are rough).
Unlike INTp's where it's all fucked and they wallow in the gloom side of life. My ISTp friend and I just keep truckin and always revert back to things will get better-which at the same time could be Ne seeking, the old "what's for you want go by you".
Don't know much about this dichotomy, but that's the types irl ime for ya.
If this isn't being a positivist, then what is?
Last edited by Cyclops; 04-16-2009 at 08:45 PM.