Still Awesome Gammas Here?

**Banana Pancakes** · 04-07-2009, 02:03 AM

I love you guys!

**aestrivex** · 04-07-2009, 05:38 AM

isn't it truly empowering that everyone understands and accepts that jung was ILI?

**Jarno** · 04-07-2009, 10:58 AM

Originally Posted by niffweed17

isn't it truly empowering that everyone understands and accepts that jung was ILI?

*SPAM*

**aestrivex** · 04-07-2009, 01:11 PM

very well; it is established then that jung was ILI, and nobody will condescend to dispute this conclusion.

**aestrivex** · 04-07-2009, 04:29 PM

it seems that the matter is settled that jung was ILI.

**MasterfulMischief** · 04-07-2009, 04:31 PM

Originally Posted by niffweed17

it seems that the matter is settled that jung was ILI.

annnnd, joke landed.

**aestrivex** · 04-07-2009, 07:58 PM

very well; so it's firmly entrenched in socionics doctrine that jung was ILI.

**Ritella** · 04-07-2009, 08:02 PM

niffweed's presence can be replaced if someone wrote an automated program that posts some random number of times a phrase that means "Jung was an ILI" with various permutations for each sentence construct.
any takers?

**Jarno** · 04-07-2009, 09:14 PM

Originally Posted by Ritella

niffweed's presence can be replaced if someone wrote an automated program that posts some random number of times a phrase that means "Jung was an ILI" with various permutations for each sentence construct.
any takers?

I'm way to awesome for that.

**aestrivex** · 04-07-2009, 11:19 PM

so it seems that the conjecture that jung was an especially evocative exemplar of the ILI metabolism dynamic is uniformly approbated.

**aestrivex** · 04-08-2009, 04:26 AM

all right then; we all agree that jung was ILI.

Thread: Still Awesome Gammas Here?

Thread Tools

Display

Still Awesome Gammas Here?

Posting Permissions