Scored 33. I had fun.
Scored 33. I had fun.
Binary or dichotomous systems, although regulated by a principle, are among the most artificial arrangements that have ever been invented. -- William Swainson, A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals (1835)
26 for me and I was guessing at some of those. I don't see how Gilly got 34/36 !!!
ISTp
SLI
Enneagram 5 with a side of wings.
34/36
From Out Of Service:
Openness to Experience/Intellect
High scorers tend to be original, creative, curious, complex; Low scorers tend to be conventional, down to earth, narrow interests, uncreative.
You enjoy having novel experiences and seeing things in new ways. (Your percentile: 88)
Conscientiousness
High scorers tend to be reliable, well-organized, self-disciplined, careful; Low scorers tend to be disorganized, undependable, negligent.
You probably have a messy desk! (Your percentile: 8)
Extraversion
High scorers tend to be sociable, friendly, fun loving, talkative; Low scorers tend to be introverted, reserved, inhibited, quiet.
You are relatively social and enjoy the company of others. (Your percentile: 74)
Agreeableness
High scorers tend to be good natured, sympathetic, forgiving, courteous; Low scorers tend to be critical, rude, harsh, callous.
You are neither extremely forgiving nor irritable. (Your percentile: 57)
Neuroticism
High scorers tend to be nervous, high-strung, insecure, worrying; Low scorers tend to be calm, relaxed, secure, hardy.
You are generally relaxed. (Your percentile: 37)
Stan is not my real name.
I would think harmonizing subtypes might do well at this. Then again, I suspect I may be a harmonizing subtype and I did lousy.Originally Posted by Krig the Viking
I got 29/36, and found it surprisingly easy. I thought I would be terrible at it.
Looking at the various scores in this thread, it doesn't appear to be correlated with type at all. Maybe subtype, perhaps? But I've been studying subtype so much lately, I tend to think everything is subtype.
Probably not very subtype related either.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
I got 34/36
Hello, my name is Bee. Pleased to meet you .
Does a high score on this test correlate with VI skills?
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
Thanks, but much of that went over my head :redface:
Doubtful, because mine suck some major ballsack.Does a high score on this test correlate with VI skills?
I guess this has been a humbling day.
Stan is not my real name.
Absolutely.Does a high score on this test correlate with VI skills?
lol that's a refreshing opinion.
...the human race will disappear. Other races will appear and disappear in turn. The sky will become icy and void, pierced by the feeble light of half-dead stars. Which will also disappear. Everything will disappear. And what human beings do is just as free of sense as the free motion of elementary particles. Good, evil, morality, feelings? Pure 'Victorian fictions'.
INTp
I only got 27, which I find strange since people are always telling me I can practically "read their mind" and I am very good in person (or on the phone even) at picking up on people's emotions.
I think part of it is it is subjective depending on how you react to an expression. For example, the ones that said "despondent" or "uninterested" etc I actually though looked sort of interestingly introverted and I would have put "confident" or "focused" for those eyes. The "friendly" eyes looked anything but friendly to me, but instead looked too foreceful ((they looked kinda Beta ST). One person's idea of "friendly" is different than another person's.
Also some of the "hesitant" eyes just looked introverted.
A lot of the expressions also looked a bit overdone to me, like the female "playful" or "flirting" eyes looked like some lame ad of how to attract women. I don't think most expressions are so blatant expect when done by models trying to express something so clearly.
I guess I agree w/ what mercutio wrote on the 1st page of this thread.
Hi! I'm an ENFP. :-)
20.... blame the Fe Polr, but except for a few obvious ones, they all looked the same
ILI
¿Qué es la vida? Un frenesí.
¿Qué es la vida? Una ilusión;
una sombra, una ficción
y el mayor bien es pequeño.
¡Que toda la vida es sueño
y los sueños, sueños son!
Interesting exercise. 29/36. I missed two of the questions because I didn't go with my first thought. It was easier to choose the correct answer by first looking at the pictures and then derive an impression of the image, rather than read the answers first and then try to identify which response fits. Not sure if that means anything. Probably doesn't. : )
Last edited by parcel; 08-29-2009 at 03:20 PM.
EII
26/36
Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test
https://www.questionwritertracker.co.../Z4MK3TKB.html
My score: 34/36
http://thelastpsychiatrist.com/image...stribution.JPG
Accompanying chart of distribution of scores.
Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.
What was the average? Like 26.2 if I recall and the Asperger's estimate score is in like the low 20s or so.
Psychopaths also do really well on this test
Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.
35/36
How do people not ace this test every time?
27/36
35/36
ipsa scientia potestas est-adaequatio intellectus et rei
35/36
34/36
31/36
I gave myself to much poetic licence with the words. Really liked this test, thanks for posting.
Some of the women with eye shadow make-up threw me off. Probably what make-up is for anyway, to draw attention to the eye and also to confuse the viewer as to what the eyes are saying thereby creating mystery.
mystery
Last edited by wacey; 12-29-2014 at 06:18 PM.
I only scored 24. I really suck at this kind of thing. I might be Aspie or it may just be weak 1-D Fe to blame.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
Hey, that's what your duals and semi-duals are for anyway
Last edited by male; 12-29-2014 at 08:13 PM.
28/36
32/36
had to be focusing hard to be able to figure out what emotion I was mirroring. but it worked usually
in official big5 test I'm not high on either openness or agreeableness, in similarminds big5 I score higher on openness (b/c it's not standardized for age/sex)
25/36, one higher than 2009.
23. There were just too many that could go one way or the other for me depending on knowing more about the individual. I thought some could have been different or at least were not what I think of when I saw what emotion or thought they were trying to get across. They used a lot of stereotypes and other things besides just the eyes to make a conclusion. Ex. age, male/female
I did not use stereotypes, no. I just looked at the eyes and whatever else was visible in the pic around the eyes.
I also got 31/36
I knew which ones were wrong though before I clicked. I just wasn't sure about them and they were all men. I need to practice reading people's eyes.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I'll just add that I did not follow the instructions completely. I glanced at the words as whole then chose the word that stood out to me immediately after glancing at the small images of the eyes. I didn't even pay attention to other words as individual words. If that makes sense? I did it very quickly as well, not taking time to think about my choice when I was unsure because I already knew I got it wrong. Anyone else approach it this way...
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Yeah, I guess I did.
Edit: McBain did very well. He is the Fe/Ni I was referring to. His posts are gone so I am clarifying.
Having done the test a couple more times over the years I now get them all right so my first test is the only one that matters.
Last edited by Aylen; 10-04-2019 at 12:39 AM.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
35/36. I took it once before with same results.
Iunno, most of the answers seemed pretty easy to intuit. I don't think it's fair to call me conceited just for that. It's not like I'm calling people idiots for not getting everything right.
30/36.
29/36... one test score closer to autism
29
32!
I wonder whether scores would differ if the pictures were in colour. Having the images in grayscale left out a lot of dimension to these faces. A lot of them just looked bored to me!
Reply With Quote
