Right there I entirely disagree. Def not alpha.Originally Posted by Alpha
btw I got ENFj or INFp, I like them both.
Right there I entirely disagree. Def not alpha.Originally Posted by Alpha
btw I got ENFj or INFp, I like them both.
D-SEI9w1
This is me and my dual being scientific together
I've a feeling he got the abstract/concrete of elements exactly backward.
Alpha getsimproving, Delta gets
improving, Gamma gets
improving, Beta gets
improving.
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
I think he had the same problem in the word groups version, which was the best one so far in my opinion. If he did some rearranging of the words there and maybe brought back some of the stuff he had taken out of his older test (the downloadable one), it could be a success.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
So it does. Me /FAIL [I thought the first was about possibilities too]
I got ENFj in the new one.
I got ENTpWAT? how the hell those answers could give a T type I have no idea
.
Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.
ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
The Ineffable IEI
The Einstein ENTp
johari nohari
http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/
Socionics Test v6.0.5 Beta 1
It sucks.
Here's my results:
I can't help you if you don't provide suggestions for quadra descriptions so that the test can give accurate results.![]()
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
I think for the Alpha Ne bit, it was about 'maximising positive possibilities'. Wouldn't this apply more to ENTps than INTjs?
(Presuming that I'm an INTj) I identify more with the phrase 'minimising negative possibilities'.
I gots isfp.![]()
New version:
Socionics Test - Home
Got ENTp again
The end is nigh
It took me a little while to decide between #2 or #4 on the first page. My first choice gave me ISTj again (yes Redbaron, I know...), my second choice gave me ENTj. This is probably a good test. Thank you Hugo!
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat."
--Theodore Roosevelt
"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover."
-- Mark Twain
"Man who stand on hill with mouth open will wait long time for roast duck to drop in."
-- Confucius
I got ISTp this time.
(Group 1 fits me pretty much completely)![]()
INFj
9w1 sp/sx
I got ISFp now.
Group 3 is awesome. Group 1 is a lot like me, but I am not so politically correct, because if it a fact, we must accept it rather than using euphemisms or saying "Don't say that" trying to cover up the Truth. I dislike people like that, and if I was in a lecture or watching a debate, I would much prefer the Truth to be told to me.
D-SEI9w1
This is me and my dual being scientific together
My sis took it and got ISFp, which is not that far fetched.
The end is nigh
Honestly, I still think this test is terrible.
Climb the mountains and get their good tidings. Nature's peace will flow into you as sunshine flows into trees. The winds will blow their own freshness into you, and the storms their energy, while cares will drop off like autumn leaves.
John Muir
I didn't think any of the first four groups fit me. The second time I took it, I got ENFp.
IEI-Fe 4w3
Even though the test is not 100% accurate, I believe that Hugo is on the right track, that is why I offer him encouragement.
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat."
--Theodore Roosevelt
"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover."
-- Mark Twain
"Man who stand on hill with mouth open will wait long time for roast duck to drop in."
-- Confucius
The current version is horrible. I don't identify with any of the quadra descriptions.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
The quadra descriptions are now so blatantly obvious that I couldn't help but hunt down Alpha and click that one. However, I got the right type - INTj.
Yes, it's possible that what he had wrong was not +/- but accepting/creating. In which case his methodology is messed up - allpeople would be Irrational, for instance. Perhaps this series of questions would be good:
- Te/Fi
- Se/Ni
- Ne/Si
- Se/Ni
- Te/Fi
- Fe/Ti
- Ne/Si
- Te/Fi
- Fe/Ti
- Fe/Ti
- Se/Ni
- Ne/Si
Followed by:
- Judging/Perceiving
- NF/ST or NT/SF
If the first question conflicts with Judging/Perceiving, then that's your Creative subtype.
LII-Ne
"Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
- Blair Houghton
Johari
I uploaded the older test, for anyone who might be interested:
http://www.easy-share.com/1904192779/HUGO TEST.rar
Just download, extract and run the .exe file.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
i'm glad that nobody disputes the obvious fact that jung was ILI.
so apparently we have reached the universal consensus that jung was ILI.
all right; it's settled then; we all clearly see jung as an ILI.
so it's apparent that we've all decided that jung was ILI.