What would make a good description?

[ItsBright]

So I've taken a interest in Socionics, but I know absolutly nothing about it. And because I know nothing about it, the task of figuring myself out has become a very difficult task.

So I'm asking for your help. But before I try to tell you about myself, I need to know what would be considered important and what would just be trivial.

So, uh, that's my question or query or something along those lines.

[Dioklecian]

So I've taken a interest in Socionics, but I know absolutly nothing about it. And because I know nothing about it, the task of figuring myself out has become a very difficult task.

So I'm asking for your help. But before I try to tell you about myself, I need to know what would be considered important and what would just be trivial.

So, uh, that's my question or query or something along those lines.

You are INTJ, welcome

[UDP]

........

he might be, but I look down upon such instantaneous judgements.


By the by, what do you call your own type, Dioklecian?

[Dioklecian]

........

he might be, but I look down upon such instantaneous judgements.


By the by, what do you call your own type, Dioklecian?

Good question

I was just being clever with the typing, but I got a INTJ impression, its' a suggestion, just like typing someone from VI. But I think its' right.

[Gilly]

I wouldn't judge him right off the bat; that's not unlike what I said upon introducing myself at ENTP.org a while ago.

Things that can help judge type:
Your habits, interests, hobbies; how you relate to other people; what your biggest problems day-to-day life stem from; what kind of learner you are (visual, auditory, etc.); things in that vein would be useful.

[XoX]

Quick adhoc guide to typing:

You use people to recharge yourself mentally: (E)xtrovert
You use time alone to recharge yourself mentally: (I)ntrovert

You like abstract concepts and see them as a natural way of describing reality: (I)ntuitive
You think abstract concepts are a bit boring and difficult to grasp but a useful tool: (S)ensory

You would rather give up your feelings than your logic: (T)hinker
You would rather give up your logic than you feelings: (F)eeler

If you set a goal there are no excuses for giving it up: (j)udger
It is ok to give up one goal in order to achieve another: (p)erceiver

Now you can bash my adhoc guide and have a nice discussion on what socionics really means and how this is too MBTI and completely flawed

[FDG]

You would rather give up your feelings than your logic: (T)hinker
You would rather give up your logic than you feelings: (F)eeler

Paradoxically, I think that it's the opposite.

[XoX]

You would rather give up your feelings than your logic: (T)hinker
You would rather give up your logic than you feelings: (F)eeler

Paradoxically, I think that it's the opposite.

Argh I'm absolutely sure I would rather be a pure robot than a pure feeler. Ok I have this hidden agenda about being a feeler and everything but...damn I can't fight overpowering Ni...maybe Ni knows more about me than I do Now I'm not sure about what I _really_ want anymore but in a test form like the above I would click the upper option not the lower since my "visible" agenda is a thinker. I'm not sure how this applies to other people though

[UDP]

........

he might be, but I look down upon such instantaneous judgements.


By the by, what do you call your own type, Dioklecian?

Good question

I was just being clever with the typing, but I got a INTJ impression, its' a suggestion, just like typing someone from VI. But I think its' right.

by the by the way, whad do you call your own type, Dioklecian?

[Transigent]

Edited for gayness.

[Creepy-]

You would rather give up your feelings than your logic: (T)hinker
You would rather give up your logic than you feelings: (F)eeler

Paradoxically, I think that it's the opposite.

I totally agree. I want to be a Logical type, dammit! Ethics is totally over-rated...

HOWEVER...

Is there a possiblity that it might be different between rationals and irrationals?

[XoX]

You would rather give up your feelings than your logic: (T)hinker
You would rather give up your logic than you feelings: (F)eeler

Paradoxically, I think that it's the opposite.

I totally agree. I want to be a Logical type, dammit! Ethics is totally over-rated...

HOWEVER...

Is there a possiblity that it might be different between rationals and irrationals?

I asked the local ISFj and although she would very much like to be considered a logical person she would never ever give up her F. For her life without F is pointless and empty.

[Creepy-]

I asked the local ISFj and although she would very much like to be considered a logical person she would never ever give up her F. For her life without F is pointless and empty.

Thanks for that

My thinking was the for irrationals the hidden agenda probably comes into play but a rational isn't going to want to give up their base function. I like my very much, lol.

[implied]

[Dioklecian]

Dio is INTj to the max. Fo shizzle.

Why do you say that?

[XoX]

I asked the local ISFj and although she would very much like to be considered a logical person she would never ever give up her F. For her life without F is pointless and empty.

Thanks for that

My thinking was the for irrationals the hidden agenda probably comes into play but a rational isn't going to want to give up their base function. I like my very much, lol.

That is very possible. Maybe I should make a poll about this to get more statistics