Are these INTj traits or not INTj? : Vote please
Do you think this suits INTJs :
Suspiciousness, ideas of reference, illusions; "cognitive slippage," a disturbing sense of discontinuity with respect to time and person; tendency to misinterpret: reacts to symbols, to possible meanings, rather than facts; poor at generalizing from one situation to another analogous one; concreteness, and humorlessness; conviction of unlikeablity (Stone, pp. 2719, 2221, 2725, 2726).
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
They can all be twisted in a myriad of ways.
Thanks for the reply, do you think the description is similar to the iNTJs or it sounds completely off? Would it be INTP better?Originally Posted by ishysquishy
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
INTp could fit... there is an emphasis on danger.
Yeah, but we're kind of blaise about it.
Dioklecian, is this how you feel? Are you trying to type yourself indirectly?
Binary or dichotomous systems, although regulated by a principle, are among the most artificial arrangements that have ever been invented. -- William Swainson, A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals (1835)
I am looking at different aspects. Thats' just a quote from from ptypes.com
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
Re: INTJ TRAITS or NOT INTJ: Vote please
Where did you get this from?
Is this all that is written, is this the only context of those words, or is there more?
What you highlighted is interesting, but... where did it come from?
A little more background on those words you posted might help people respond with more solid opinions.
But as for myself, I'm with Ishi's first response, in general.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
The words are from www.ptypes.com
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
Yeah, you mentioned it was ptypes
BUt where specifically?
I'm searching for it right now on the site, but I'd like a direct link to the page
The "idiosyncratic" page: http://www.ptypes.com/idiosyncratic.html
is interesting...
Nevermind, I think I found it........
http://www.ptypes.com/schizotypalpd.html
is that it?
update:
Considering the page, I can see how those characteristics may be of an INTJ when he/she is in a more destuctive, disease-esque state of being.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
I'm not sure if I entirely trust the ptypes site
Diocletian, these statements come off to me as subjectively negative.
I don't mean them negatively, but are things that sometimes i have noticed in myself and my INTJ friends.
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
yes and no. though, as a generalized statement/observation of intj behavior it makes me cringe. it's not entirely accurate.
lol
Could it be INTP?
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
again, yes and no. there are too many conflicting descriptions within the body of that pssage for them to all point to one specific type as a whole, complete generalization.
lol
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote