Seriously. Well, I really need Te!
Guess I'll learn to appreciate my dual with age. :-/
Seriously. Well, I really need Te!
Guess I'll learn to appreciate my dual with age. :-/
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
Judging from the photo in your avatar, if you can't appreciate them yet I'd go for Mr. Right-Now.
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
I was reading some of the descriptions of Te-seeking .. how it says that Te-seekers appreciate reliable information rather than a finished analysis .. that's how I am I think. When someone gives me their opinion, I try to determine how they arrived at it, to extract the facts from what they're saying, and throw out the rest - then I feel I can make up my own mind. Also, Dad's LSE and Mum's LSI ... and I've always appreciated the way Dad thinks and explains things ... whereas Mum's style has always annoyed me.
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
Extraverted Thinking: The External Dynamics of Objects.
Te covers algorithmic logic, specifics of events, activity, behavior, etc.
In other words, Te is the information element which deals with the physical characteristics of objects in motion/events; the way things are done.
If you love seeing this in people, and it just "completes you", you should find yourself to be an IxFj; you can easily figure out your creative function through means other than expression. If you value Se or Ni specifically, you are a gamma and, thus, ESI; if you value either Ne or Si specifically, you should be an INFj.
To find the answer here, tell me which you find more attractive:
1.Someone with a good work-ethic who thinks on a grand scale and is good at both predicting future events as well as seeing patterns in things which don't necessarily exist in reality. They like reading, architecture, and even the occasional tussle. This person is also emotionally close, yet finds himself at-ease playing sports.
OR
2.Someone with a good work-ethic who's thinking is more close to reality; they have an extremely good sense of how things work. This person is energetic but rarely gets over-excited. They like sex, good food, and fine wine. This person is emotionally close, and has no problem with analogies; they also have little trouble seeing the potential in things.
Choose one and I'll tell you your type.![]()
Wond'ring aloud, How we feel today. Last night sipped the sunset, My hand in her hair. We are our own saviours, As we start both our hearts, Beating life Into each other. ~Ian Anderson
I don't know ... they're too vague! :-p What does "seeing patterns in things that don't exist in reality mean"? I guess the 2nd one. Mainly because I think of people who think on too grand a scale as being a bit bulldozerish and callous when it comes to the details and individual's feelings.
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
You don't like Te, mune?![]()
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
I have a bad history with robots.
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
Who cares! I like you, let's hug. ^_^
Hello, my name is Bee. Pleased to meet you .
That is a more MBTI-related thought.
Si is the external dynamics of fields; Se is the external statics of objects.
They are both external, but so are Te and Ti.
In opposition to Ni and Ne, Si and Se are easily picked out as "similar"; they are in the fact that they are external, thus dealing with physical states.
However, Si deals with fields, and Se deals with objects; this is a very large difference.
Se deals with an object's form, size, shape, and location (all of these things without activity); Si deals with the tangible interactions perceived through these objects, as well as how these events affect you physically.
They are similar, but very different. "Si v. Se"="Physical Experiences v. Physical State"
Wond'ring aloud, How we feel today. Last night sipped the sunset, My hand in her hair. We are our own saviours, As we start both our hearts, Beating life Into each other. ~Ian Anderson
So what's the difference between "field" and "object"?
-
It's Binky bitch.
See not the unsmiling lips and icy eyes,
And hear not the silence after.
Look instead as the mime hypnotizes
And listen to the laughter.
Wond'ring aloud, How we feel today. Last night sipped the sunset, My hand in her hair. We are our own saviours, As we start both our hearts, Beating life Into each other. ~Ian Anderson
Tom, your brand of arrogance is kinda cute. I think I might keep you.
Jem, I don't mind if you move over to Delta. From what I know, you seem fine as SEI. So... I know, I'm no help.
Forgetting the T's for a second, what do you think about Fe vs. Fi? What are they to you and how do you react to them?
By the way, I don't think wanting to and being able to form your own opinions on things is the same thing as not-Ti-seeking.
Last edited by Minde; 01-12-2009 at 03:15 AM. Reason: name change -> irrelevant question removal
Its not arrogance, its!
![]()
Wond'ring aloud, How we feel today. Last night sipped the sunset, My hand in her hair. We are our own saviours, As we start both our hearts, Beating life Into each other. ~Ian Anderson