Quote Originally Posted by Singularity View Post
I'm getting sick of giving Socionics interpretations, because he could literally be any type... so I'm just going to give a non-socionics analysis/impressions, and maybe you can type that way...

So the impression of him on that video is... he's still really boring, and he mildly irritates me for some reason. Just my own impression, not thinking about Socionics. He doesn't "give" a lot of emotion, even though technically, he's smiling and laughing etc.

The other guy (Christoph) also appears to be kind of stoic and unexpressive, but he doesn't irritate me for some reason. Actually, he appears to be considerate and good-natured, like he goes along with Graham and at least tries to be funny or make a joke or something. He's smiling a lot when things are funny and when he's enjoying himself. While Daniel Craig just kind of dryly says obvious things in a concrete way. He appears to have not much imagination. He does not appear to be very considerate or aware of others, he just cares about doing his own thing.

THAT'S MY IMPRESSION. Don't kill me.
That was actually useful! <3

According to that, Craig might have a PoLR or PoLR, so ISTp or ISTj would be what you saw.

I'd only need your accurate type :/ Irritation points are usually indicators of Superego or having one's DS denied.

Given that both of them caused you practically reverse impressions, risky hypothesis: they are not identicals.

ISTj (not ISTp as I said earlier, let's switch the scenario upside down for this) for Waltz because well, he plays along emotionally, all with his accuracy-aiming Ti zingers. Se creative: "DON'T!"
ISTp for Craig because of his captain obvious matter-of-fact approach. Also highly physical cognition, presence, awareness.

Doing his own thing also points to self-preservation first and social blind spot. Christoph is SO/SP so there we go about instincts as well.