
In my opinion, it did help. What you described as a lot like you was Ne (1). And you also said you can be good at Ni, but you don't have as much confidence in it (3). So, so far you're looking like a possible Ne ego type. You described yourself as not being good at Se at all and finding it boring (2) with the only part not fitting was your ability to 'size people up' but the way you talked about what you meant with 'sizing people up' here sounded like Fi to me, rather than Se.
You said that you sometimes find people with Si interesting(4), but not all the time, and you're okay at it, but it's not your favorite. Your response to Fi (5) was interesting because I was leaning towards Fi for you after your response to 2. Other people think you're good at it, but you think you're just average, but you discuss it a lot to make sure you're paying enough attention to it. . . I'm not sure what to make of this, especially with what you said about Fe (6) You describe Te as rather nothing special or stand-outish, and Ti as something you like and are pretty good at.
I'm going to make a tentative guess of INTj for you. Ti leading, Ne creative and Fi role could all make sense with what you said. Maybe someone else can come in with some other suggestions that would explain Si and Fe though. Actually other people will probably want to ask you a bunch of different questions, but I wanted to see how well this would work for trying to type an unknown person. Hope you didn't mind being a guinea pig!
