Accepting/Producing Subtypes

[hoodrat]

So assuming that accepting/producing subtypes is a real phenomenon, an accepting subtype (leading function subtype) would get along better with their semi-dual?

[diljs]

Not sure which of these you're asking, but

Better with their semi dual than with their dual?

No.

Better with their semi dual than a producing subtype would be?

Yes, that would make sense. Accepting subtype would place less value on the creative function (semi dual's POLR).

[hoodrat]

Not sure which of these you're asking, but

Better with their semi dual than with their dual?

No.

Better with their semi dual than a producing subtype would be?

Yes, that would make sense. Accepting subtype would place less value on the creative function (semi dual's POLR).

yeah, the second one, lol

[strrrng]

The idea of accepting/producing has little to do with subtypes imo. If an ENTp is a Ti subtype, Ti is his leading function. Obviously not under aushra's definitions, but in essence, in his mental awareness, Ti is his dominant function.

[FDG]

The idea of accepting/producing has little to do with subtypes imo. If an ENTp is a Ti subtype, Ti is his leading function. Obviously not under aushra's definitions, but in essence, in his mental awareness, Ti is his dominant function.

Creative Ti of course, not accepting Ti

[strrrng]

Creative Ti of course, not accepting Ti

No

[Trevor]

So assuming that accepting/producing subtypes is a real phenomenon, an accepting subtype (leading function subtype) would get along better with their semi-dual?

yes.

[Creepy-Diana]

.