I leave for a few weeks, come back, people change their types.
I leave for a few weeks, come back, people change their types.
*looks ashamed and runs away*
()
3w4-1w2-5w4 sx/sp
We had some significantly incorrect understandings of the functions and temperaments. I actually think the jump to a conflicting quadra is not as impossible as it sounds - they share all the strong functions, it's rather a matter of functional preferences. And it keeps the clubs the same - like I don't think I could be anything but a rational ST.
I think, perhaps, too much emphasis is placed upon conflict between the quadras in the context of personal relationships. I can't see why I can't get along very well with other people if they are mature, sensible, friendly and polite. Which are all features I've found in Deltas and people of every quadra.
The mental leap it took to thinking of myself as LSI as opposed to LSE was not one taken lightly or for shits and giggles. There's a couple of long threads somewhere on the forum pretty much detailing that process if you are particularly interested in observing what that process was like.
allez cuisine!
I don't know if I'm Delta, but I do value Delta values the most.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
I think I'm one of the very few who hasn't changed their type on a monthly basis.
I've always stuck with ISTP--still do
For some time now I have considered myself a delta, but never with complete certainty
I'm investigating a new type after family/friends read the descriptions (re: me) and gave some surprising answers...
The Stratiskevishiasefgjhysdgfjuyws ENFp profile is the closest thing I've ever read to my personality, IMO.
Hehe, no need to apologize though. It's just out of curiosity that I ask.
The only confirmed Deltas are:
- Slacker Mom
- Minde
O, hai guise.
INFj
9w1 sp/sx
I don't visit/post much of anything here anymore. But I still sometimes come on the board to see if there's anything interesting going on. (usually when bored though)
NeFi is still the best description of me that I've ever found, everything that it entails, pros & cons.
IEE 649 sx/sp cp
Are you saying you want me to have a mental breakdown? I can't believe you'd wish that on me. That's just mean.I'm kind of hoping you're not a IEE now.
IEE
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
If I'm something other than IEE, the fabric of my world would turn itself inside out and I don't know how I'd handle that.
IEE
You make it sound as if they decided to not be delta. People can't change their type, whether somebody is or isn't in a qaudra isn't within their control. They are either now wrong or they never were delta to begin with, nobody changed types.
Minde is a beta introvert, LSI > IEI, in my opinion.
Apparently Slacker Mom is the only real Delta here on this forum. Anyone else who dares to think themselves as Delta are either Betas in denial or some sort of ether-being, homeless and stuck between existences.
Why is it that so many are "suspected" of being Beta and so few of Delta? Why can't one of these type debates include something like, "No! You're definitely not Beta! You are so Delta it's not even funny" or something like that. It's like whenever somebody's type is questioned, the default is Beta. Anyway...
Sereno, I have not changed my type. And I do not intend to for the foreseeable future. I consider myself INFj.
Sneg, and anybody else who agrees with him, you have yet to provide me with any good reasons or explanations for why you think me Beta. Until you can offer some convincing arguments, I'm not going to take your opinions on the matter seriously. Sorry. And, let me warn you, for me to get anywhere near changing what I think my type is, your arguments are going to have to be very, very convincing, stemming from accurate knowledge of me and a solid understanding of the theory. And, not to offend, but I don't think many here meet both of those qualifications together.
However, I will listen to/read what you have to say, so if anyone would like to further discuss my type, there is a thread dedicated to that very subject.
Oh, to find you in dreams - mixing prior, analog, and never-beens... facts slip and turn and change with little lucidity. except the strong, permeating reality of emotion.
I can't imagine you as ISTj or INFp. If you weren't INFj, the only other type I'd be able to see would be ISFj.
I consider people's self-typings as generally more relevant than other people do. But you've been around long enough and have contributed enough to have some idea. So if you say INFj over ISFj I'm inclined to believe you.
I think the assumption is that someone as serious about religion as you must be Se-valuing, and maybe Ti as well. But this place is all about typing by huge sweeping generalizations and assumptions these days.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
Why do you say/think that?
Alright, correct me if anything I say here is wrong:Sneg, and anybody else who agrees with him, you have yet to provide me with any good reasons or explanations for why you think me Beta. Until you can offer some convincing arguments, I'm not going to take your opinions on the matter seriously. Sorry. And, let me warn you, for me to get anywhere near changing what I think my type is, your arguments are going to have to be very, very convincing, stemming from accurate knowledge of me and a solid understanding of the theory. And, not to offend, but I don't think many here meet both of those qualifications together.
What you seek is for somebody to provide you with a complete, coherent picture of your type built from simple and well-understood parts, for there to be concrete order and structure in their arguments. And also in order for you to take the other person seriously they would have to express their thoughts and ideas with clarity and exactitude, to present clear and concise explanations of concepts, rather than a focus on things that are not directly pertinent. Basically you want good, solid rationales and justifications that are pertinent. This is what you had in mind when you stared that thread about yourself, you seek, expect and feel relaxed by a source of logical certainty.