Quote Originally Posted by Jack Oliver Aaron View Post
I can see and appreciate why people think Russell Brand is ILE.

Nevertheless, now that we've taken a while to observe him proceed on his political mission, I can safely say that he's a very likely candidate for EIE.

Sure, he values . That is evident in his argumenation. Nevertheless, I would not say that he has strong . Although used reactively in debates, he never applies it in the advancement of his own ideals, preferring pure, overflowing . Compare this to the likes of Bill Maher, Richard Dawkins, John Cleese and even myself whose rides above . Russell is a master of the persona, the facade of fame that he projects to the media. Indeed, I would say his main motivation in life is not the pursuit of interesting possibilities but the effect he has on the sentiments of others. It is clear that he is a passionate communicator with 4D . The emotion decorates his words even at the expense of coherence which is nothing like the firm communicators seen with LIEs and ILEs and their 4D .

I would also argue against IEI. Sure he has in the past portrayed a dreamy, go with the flow attitude but this can only be a persona in comparison to the proactive stance he is now taking, not even having to mention the sheer tirelessness with which he has always gone from one thing to the next. As Jeremy Paxman comments, he is going to burn himself out at some point. At the same time IEI is rarely so extreme in their behaviour as emotional effect is always creative to the long term vision .
His recent Paxman interview I think may support weak but valued Ti. He wants a revolution but does not seem to have the will or capability to describe how and to what. EIE seems likely to me.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGxFJ5nL9gg