the reason I ask is that having read some of Wealth of Nations, I tend to agree with the LIE analysis, and maybe the Te focus is why I found it (relatively) enjoyable to read (being Te dual seeking myself, or maybe not). However the subject matter is arguably most suited to a Te/Ni treatment in the first place, so maybe some of what is coming through is a reflection of what he is writing about rather than himself (an alpha NT, being competent in Te and Ni could perhaps give off an gamma NT impression if writing on a gamma NT subject). In contrast, moral philosophy is probably something which is harder to approach in the same manner, so I was wondering (having not read it myself) if (and if so, how) his Te/Ni-ness comes through there as well.



Reply With Quote