*taps fingers*
*taps fingers*
It's the side of an eyeball?
Binary or dichotomous systems, although regulated by a principle, are among the most artificial arrangements that have ever been invented. -- William Swainson, A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals (1835)
wow...
The scanning of the inside of an alien [insert any of the following words]:
Space Ship, Artifact, Anal Probe, Conspiracy, Freak ...
*twirls pen through fingers*
It is an eyeball, Joy. It's an image from some eyelid cosmetic surgery site.
Binary or dichotomous systems, although regulated by a principle, are among the most artificial arrangements that have ever been invented. -- William Swainson, A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals (1835)
Sooo....
Who can tell me what that is?
and the INTp was the one who got it...
Edited: haha i should have read the whole thread before answering
Yeah Joy, INTps know how to right click. Fancy that.Originally Posted by Joy
the ENTps didn't
Everyone knows that INTps are smarter anyway.
I knew how to right click! But my answer was still less than perfect...
who do you consider reliable V.I. sources here?
hmm?
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" isand not
aixelsyd, you self-type as an SEE nowadays?
I was always of the opinion that you looked like one!
wait, your really SEE now?
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" is
your use of sarcasm is impressive
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" is
I would say Ashton, because he got all my intertype relations to fit perfectly simply by me giving him some pictures. He seems very consistent, and he has a huge gallery of typings too. He comes across as rather experienced by my subjective observation.
I don't think I'm being too certain about this, and I wouldn't say it if I didn't mean it. I would say him, because he truly astonished me with his answers, and I don't know how he learned to VI like that. But he's a consistent person when it comes to this stuff.
i use to thing i was pro, but i doubt my skills.
asd
funny, your name was the only one that came up to me as someone who had a score above zero in our VI tests. But you seem to doubt now too, so that leaves nobody.
I think Maritsa is the one most relying on VI of all forum members and she seems to use the VI methods out of that socionics book that you can buy at amazon. Those VI techniques are interesting, though the authors are way to overconfident, as is Maritsa...
So at this point I think nobody here is better at VI than a random guess.
Nobody in particular (regardless of what Maritsa may say); more of a conglamoration of everyone who's in the mood. When it comes to VI, quantity is more reliable than quality.
So you are one of the authors of this book?
The chapter about V.I. is pretty interesting, indeed. But I really don't think determining the j/p dichotomy just by looking at necks is a reliable method...
I disagree. My first question is always: Do I like this person or not? So I can exclude a lot of types at the very beginning...
Reply With Quote
