so i sense that we've come to the collective conclusion that jung was ILI.
so i sense that we've come to the collective conclusion that jung was ILI.
that was hard to read. fwiw, i get different results under stress, too. i think it's Ne-valuing to enjoy what you are.Originally Posted by Brilliand
For a while I would think I was ILI when I was hungry, then go back to LII when I was happy again. I think what you enjoy being is what you are.
EDIT: Either that or that's type-related and only Merry types are what they enjoy being. Of course, then it comes down to the question of whether you like to enjoy what you're being.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
.
let's set it in stone once and for all, then; jung was ILI, plain and simple.
Hugo is a test making machine!
"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs, even though checkered by failure, than to take rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy much nor suffer much, because they live in the gray twilight that knows not victory nor defeat."
--Theodore Roosevelt
"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover."
-- Mark Twain
"Man who stand on hill with mouth open will wait long time for roast duck to drop in."
-- Confucius
so; it's unanimous; jung was ILI.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote