my "case" amounts to nothing more than putting the data up for review. scroll back to my first post on this and you'll find me say exactly that. you're the one forcing the issue into a conclusive verdict long before doing so is warranted. "retarded" indeed.My point was that it is retarded to believe such claims without having done the research since more often than not such claims are insignificant. Have you done that research? If not, you shouldn't be defending your case with such trivial data.
it is extremely complicated. you have clearly not read anything on this topic.Which brings me back to my original question: why aren't more people using financial astrology? Financial astrology is no more complicated (from what I've read at least), than the majority of techniques traders regularly employ.
i don't find this issue sufficiently pressing to call on the favors of someone who is no more than an acquaintance of mine.It's always easier to make someone look brilliant in retrospect by selectively citing those things he did get correct and overlooking those he did not. Are you able to provide us with any ongoing forecasts of his? Let's be objective about this.


Reply With Quote