1) If Archer Crawford is as good as he claims to be, why is he such a nobody?
which part of "winning awards" didn't you get?

2) If Archer Crawford is as good as he claims to be, why is trying to make money selling a newsletter? He could make SO much more money managing a hedge fund.
why would he restrict himself to either?

3) If astrology is as good as is it's cracked up to be by guys like Archer Crawford, why aren't there more guys doing what he's doing?
he's far from the only one applying that type of method. also nobody said it was easy to the point anyone could succeed at it.

Labcoat, do you subscribe to his newsletter? I certainly would if I bought into the hype.
i've got a contact who subscribes to him.