Indulge me.
These are two pictures of a guy I've known for years:
He agreed to let me post them here for a while.
I do have a very strong opinion on his type, based on knowing him.
Based on VI alone, which types would you suggest for him?
Indulge me.
These are two pictures of a guy I've known for years:
He agreed to let me post them here for a while.
I do have a very strong opinion on his type, based on knowing him.
Based on VI alone, which types would you suggest for him?
![]()
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
ENTp?
LSI
He's social and can be very funny, but not so loud. But I wouldn't associate that primarily to LIE.
![]()
Not sure what each of you is looking at. Are you all comparing him to other people you know, or are you trying to get a feel for the kind of person he is? Or analyzing specific features?
I can add that the two pictures pretty much reflect how he is IRL. I mean, it's not as if he's a sullen or aggressive guy who made an effort to appear differently in the picture.
![]()
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
I don't find any comparison points from the people I know. Thus I cannot really say.
Anyways he doesn't lookego type unless he is Fi-ISFj.
Some Fi-quadra type I guess because he is your dear friend.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
The second photo reminded me eerily of a combination between myself and you, Expat. His eyes in particular remind me of myself:
...but the expression is more like yours, I think. His nose reminded me instantly of Edward Furlong, who I think is probably Beta NF, but that's probably an inconsequential detail.
Anyway, my only positive would be Ethical (mostly from the first picture). Probably intuitive, introvert>extrovert somehow....I'm going with IEI>EII>EIE>IEE.
Last edited by Gilly; 06-29-2008 at 08:10 PM.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Wow, he does look like Tolle...maybe I should switch to EII>IEI![]()
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Tolle is certainly INFx at the least; EII was a pretty strong consensus when we looked at videos of him and Oprah, a probable EIE.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
ENFP.
i don't know why, but the first picture, in particular, just seems very ENFP to me. Everyone has a pensive look, but there's something subtley different about it in each type...
I sort of just wish I could get a zoom in on pic #1, and also know what was happening around him.
EII; E6(w5)
i am flakey
no. tolle's type was never agreed upon, we could all be wrong, and it's just one case.
i think i know what you mean about social and extro/intro. Rick has an article on it somewhere. If you mean how "social" people are isn't necc. correlated to introversion/extroversion, then, i would agree.I do remember reading somewhere that social and extro is not the same,
this is silly. no reason to assume that you can't make a significant contribution. who knows how much other people know, anyway? this isn't surgery- there are no claims of expertise, objective measures of knowledge, or considerable damage if you make a mistake.so I should probably go back to studying before typing people.
it's people's own prerogative how seriously they take your comments.
EII; E6(w5)
i am flakey
...
Last edited by Suomea; 09-27-2008 at 05:18 PM.
Suomea
I can see how the first picture would give that impression.
When I first typed him I wondered a bit about ENFp, but INFj it is. IJ temperament, Si hidden agenda rather than as dual-seeking, Te as dual-seeking rather than as hidden agenda, Se PoLR, Ti role -- everything fits really.
![]()
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
At first glance the second one looks a bit Se to me, like he has a bit of a sneer. I could be misreading it though.
The pictures are of poor quality. I have an opinion on what the possible and impossible types are, but it is irritating that you can't V.I. him properly. The pictures should be as in the second photo where we can see him up front, but we should be able to see as much as possible of his facial structure, and that is much easier if he is closer to the camera. And it is better if he doesn't smile.
ESE.
INTp