Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: Te in ego & Religion/beliefs/spirituality

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    "Come with me if you want to live"
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,907
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Te in ego & Religion/beliefs/spirituality

    I am remembering Expat saying something like "If most people ever saw what goes on in the mind of a Te dominant, they might not be able to believe it" or something like that. (Please find the real quote).

    As some of you may know, I have been looking at spirituality and religions for a while, and especially recently I've been looking at some things.

    This thread is sort of a mixture of a number of questions and comments I have on the matter of religion/beliefs/spirituality.


    First, do you know any Te-ego people who are very religious or spiritual? What are they like to you?


    For myself, I have been investigating spirituality and religion for a while, but it still seems to remain entirely beyond my grasp. Being around more and more people over the last few years, and seeing those that are really "ethically skilled", it has made me realize how unskilled I am. I seem to be unable to "use ethics" properly. Maybe that's because it's not something you "use", I don't know. At any rate, religion/beliefs/spirituality remain elusive for me.

    I am actually beginning to understand why there were things like "shamans" and designated religious people, because it seems so much easier for me to look to someone (whom I trust on these matters) for advice, rather than trying to figure anything out myself.


    I haven't exactly "lost faith" in my ability to have faith or understand faith/spirituality/be religious, but I wonder if maybe it is just something I cannot be good at, or, something I should really just leave to other people. I wonder if this is one thing that I cannot cultivate much skill at, and should just sort of realize that it is simply not my forte.
    Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
    If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.

    ~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
    ~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.

  2. #2
    implied's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    7,747
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i only remember something about how if most people were inside the mind of an INTp for a day, they would probably not want to claim they were INTp. i'm obviously paraphrasing here because i can't remember the quote verbatim either.
    6w5 sx
    model Φ: -+0
    sloan - rcuei

  3. #3
    Your DNA is mine. Mediator Kam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    4,477
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UDP View Post
    For myself, I have been investigating spirituality and religion for a while, but it still seems to remain entirely beyond my grasp. Being around more and more people over the last few years, and seeing those that are really "ethically skilled", it has made me realize how unskilled I am. I seem to be unable to "use ethics" properly. Maybe that's because it's not something you "use", I don't know. At any rate, religion/beliefs/spirituality remain elusive for me.

    I haven't exactly "lost faith" in my ability to have faith or understand faith/spirituality/be religious, but I wonder if maybe it is just something I cannot be good at, or, something I should really just leave to other people. I wonder if this is one thing that I cannot cultivate much skill at, and should just sort of realize that it is simply not my forte.
    You make it sound like religion is a woodworking class or something. Religion and spirituality isn't (shouldn't be) an ethereal subject that only ethical types can fully grasp. You should be using your Te to determine what (if any) systems of religious beliefs make sense to you. Otherwise, why would you pursue it? For feelings that are based on lies? My advice would be to study as much as you can about all the different types of religions, then decide whether you think they make sense.

    I know a few Te-ego types who are religious, and they are very competent in being able to explain why they believe what they do. There is nothing airy fairy about their beliefs.
    D-SEI 9w1

    This is me and my dual being scientific together

  4. #4
    force my hand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,332
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UDP View Post
    I haven't exactly "lost faith" in my ability to have faith or understand faith/spirituality/be religious, but I wonder if maybe it is just something I cannot be good at, or, something I should really just leave to other people. I wonder if this is one thing that I cannot cultivate much skill at, and should just sort of realize that it is simply not my forte.
    It seems to me that a couple of things have to align first - both mechanistic belief and then trust that said belief is valuable to human experience. I think because of culture we tend to assume the latter, and because of it don't get too involved with the nitty-gritty aspects of the former.

    I would say spend time and energy 'questing' for your spirituality, but begin to recognize how the two aspects play out in your mind.

    For me, the biggie is mere belief - if I can't find it or it doesn't make sense with my experience, I stop there, and worry about human experience within a naturalistic context.
    SLI/ISTp -- Te subtype

  5. #5
    xyz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    7,707
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by force my hand View Post
    It seems to me that a couple of things have to align first - both mechanistic belief and then trust that said belief is valuable to human experience. I think because of culture we tend to assume the latter, and because of it don't get too involved with the nitty-gritty aspects of the former.

    I would say spend time and energy 'questing' for your spirituality, but begin to recognize how the two aspects play out in your mind.

    For me, the biggie is mere belief - if I can't find it or it doesn't make sense with my experience, I stop there, and worry about human experience within a naturalistic context.
    Thank you, you nailed it man.
    "Those who make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities..."

    - Voltaire

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    4,833
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UDP View Post
    First, do you know any Te-ego people who are very religious or spiritual?
    No.

    Quote Originally Posted by UDP
    What are they like to you?
    Scientifically minded and non-religious in general.

  7. #7
    Logos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    5,407
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phaedrus View Post
    No.


    Scientifically minded and non-religious in general.
    Just like Thomas Aquinas.

  8. #8
    jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,309
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phaedrus View Post
    No.


    Scientifically minded and non-religious in general.
    Ignore this. It likely comes from a troll. That's why it might not sound accurate.

    Jason

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    4,833
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jason_m View Post
    Ignore this. It likely comes from a troll. That's why it might not sound accurate.
    And how do you explain the fact that it actually sounds sound and accurate if we compare with how Te ego types are in real life? Is a comparison with reality irrelevant in your opinion?

  10. #10
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,853
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UDP View Post
    I am remembering Expat saying something like "If most people ever saw what goes on in the mind of a Te dominant, they might not be able to believe it" or something like that. (Please find the real quote).
    As far as I recall, when I did say something like that, I was referring to some individuals who type themselves incorrectly (in my judgement) as Te ego types. As in, they think they are Te ego but if they knew what Te ego really feels like, they'd turn away in disgust.

    Apart from that, I don't think it's more difficult to believe what goes on in the minds of Te dominants than what goes on in the minds of Fe dominants etc.
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  11. #11
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE
    Posts
    24,507
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Expat View Post
    AI don't think it's more difficult to believe what goes on in the minds of Te dominants than what goes on in the minds of Fe dominants etc.
    SEE

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  12. #12
    Logos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    5,407
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Expat View Post
    As far as I recall, when I did say something like that, I was referring to some individuals who type themselves incorrectly (in my judgement) as Te ego types. As in, they think they are Te ego but if they knew what Te ego really feels like, they'd turn away in disgust.

    Apart from that, I don't think it's more difficult to believe what goes on in the minds of Te dominants than what goes on in the minds of Fe dominants etc.
    Or Ti minds, Ne minds, or Si minds, etc.

  13. #13
    Twist-Tie Spider iAnnAu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Knoxhell TN
    Posts
    987
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UDP View Post
    As some of you may know, I have been looking at spirituality and religions for a while, and especially recently I've been looking at some things.
    For myself, I have been investigating spirituality and religion for a while, but it still seems to remain entirely beyond my grasp. Being around more and more people over the last few years, and seeing those that are really "ethically skilled", it has made me realize how unskilled I am. I seem to be unable to "use ethics" properly. Maybe that's because it's not something you "use", I don't know. At any rate, religion/beliefs/spirituality remain elusive for me.
    I'm SLI not LSE, but the "beyond my grasp" thing resonates with me. Even as a little kid, I was kinda like "yeah, right" around religious talk. Of course, I was raised by an atheist and an agnostic, but my parents also accommodated a period around 9-11 when I thought "maybe I'm missing out on something" and sampled a dozen or so churches ... so, I think I'm just not "wired" for religion.
    I've also had specific experiences that caused me to have a chip on my shoulder about people with strong religious beliefs, especially christians ... I've been trying to get over this, since it's basically a waste of energy. I can admit that many people I respect and even admire have faith, and I have no wish to respect them less just because of that aspect.
    There has of course been much debate for millenia about whether the human ability for faith signifies something unto itself. Did God create us with a need for connection to him/her/it/them, are we so free-willed that we aren't created knowing we need that connection even though we do, are we so connected on an as-yet-unconscious plane that we express our connection through the concept of God, did certain power-hungry individuals come up with the idea of God to keep the rest of us under their thumbs, is God and/or religious belief a concept that humankind will eventually outgrow ... etc. etc.
    Funny that for me it's all abstract. Whether I'd like to or not, I simply don't have a faith. And actually, I don't want to.
    However, I have noticed that the people I do respect who have faith seem to be more compassionate than the people I respect but tout no religion. This is only a small sampling group, so it's hard to say whether I should draw conclusions from it, but it's as if I can logically deduce that everything is interconnected and that I improve my place within the web by altruistic behavior (given that the AB doesn't significantly impair my self-sufficiency) ... but religious people are more likely to *feel* like giving in that way - the impulse arises spontaneously, whereas in my case I undertake the action at the conclusion of an analysis. And that brings back the nagging suspicion "maybe I'm missing out on something."
    I am actually beginning to understand why there were things like "shamans" and designated religious people, because it seems so much easier for me to look to someone (whom I trust on these matters) for advice, rather than trying to figure anything out myself.
    A friend of mine (INTP but perhaps INTj - not too sure) has undertaken a lifelong survey of religions - it's led to me reading many books I wouldn't have otherwise because we like discussing topics after both of us have read at least a couple of the same titles on a subject. For a few years, he considered himself Buddhist, but last year he became Sufi. I've spoken to him about the conversion several times, and the best that I can represent his message to me is something like
    "I figured out that I want the faith, but that I'm not disciplined enough in my personal life to maintain the faith without the structure. Then it became a problem of finding a faith worth maintaining. While Buddhism wasn't unworthy, it didn't provide the right kind of structure."
    And when I prodded him about where belief fits into that, he responded along the lines of
    "I think belief is what you make of it. Sufis believe that God is love, that by loving you get closer to God, and that by refusing to love you refuse God. I can totally get behind that - it mirrors my inner belief. On top of that, the prayers, services and rituals revolve around bringing yourself closer to God, so when I practice the faith, I'm not contradicting myself."
    This is one of the friends whom I respect highly, and I can respect this viewpoint, too. But for me, I just can't contrive faith, so engaging in the rituals of religion would not bring me closer to God - they'd make me feel like a hypocrite.
    I haven't exactly "lost faith" in my ability to have faith or understand faith/spirituality/be religious, but I wonder if maybe it is just something I cannot be good at, or, something I should really just leave to other people. I wonder if this is one thing that I cannot cultivate much skill at, and should just sort of realize that it is simply not my forte.
    One of my favorite quotes is "Believe those who are seeking the truth; doubt those who find it." - Andre Gide.
    Quote Originally Posted by Charles Bukowski
    We're all going to die, all of us, what a circus! That alone should make us love each other but it doesn't. We are terrorized and flattened by trivialities, we are eaten up by nothing.
    SLI

  14. #14
    XoX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4,407
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    People should draw a picture or take a photograph which would reflect what goes on in their mind. Or something. Perhaps visualizing it would make it easier to grasp for others. Well, it is probably hard to visualize.

  15. #15
    BLauritson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bristol, England
    Posts
    979
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by XoX View Post
    People should draw a picture or take a photograph which would reflect what goes on in their mind.
    If only it were that easy
    ILI (Indescribable Lovemaking Inc.)
    5w4 so/sx

    "IP temperament! Because today's concerns are tomorrow's indifferences!"

    Lord Fnorgle's Domain - A slowly growing collection of music, poetry and literature.
    Stickam music performances

  16. #16
    XoX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4,407
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BLauritson View Post
    If only it were that easy
    Yeah. It is not. But I guess if you are even somewhat skilled in art or music or perhaps literature then you can show (at least a little bit) what's going on inside your mind. Perhaps making a movie could show it. But for someone non skilled like me...my art or music doesn't really reflect much anything.

  17. #17
    BLauritson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bristol, England
    Posts
    979
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hmm.. I think it would half depend on your ability to write, draw, whatever, but the other half would depend on how accurately you can translate what's in your mind into an expressable format, if that makes sense. Sometimes a mental image can be far too rich or have too many sensory memories (by this I mean images, sounds, smells, etc.) or emotions attached to it to accurately express via a single sense, be it sight (drawn or written expression) or sound (music etc.).
    ILI (Indescribable Lovemaking Inc.)
    5w4 so/sx

    "IP temperament! Because today's concerns are tomorrow's indifferences!"

    Lord Fnorgle's Domain - A slowly growing collection of music, poetry and literature.
    Stickam music performances

  18. #18
    BLauritson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bristol, England
    Posts
    979
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't follow any established religion and can't see myself doing so, but now and again I think on philosophical subjects relating to spirituality (I used to do so a lot more, but my mind is too preoccupied with real life nowadays. Gone are the days when I worked weekends and had the weeks off). I tend to think about what would make sense in a given context, based on what I "know" already (or, to put it another way, what seems realistic to me). I suppose the best way to sum it up is that I think about these subjects critically, but I criticise them against a subjective understanding or belief in the first place. I don't expect anyone else to agree with what I believe, but in my own mind, what I believe is correct, in as far as I've thought about it. It's obviously not something I can actually argue the accuracy of, since I have no objective data to argue it by, but basically I evaluate everything according to my gut instinct and my conception of spirituality as a whole. It's a complicated subject.
    ILI (Indescribable Lovemaking Inc.)
    5w4 so/sx

    "IP temperament! Because today's concerns are tomorrow's indifferences!"

    Lord Fnorgle's Domain - A slowly growing collection of music, poetry and literature.
    Stickam music performances

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •