or
?
The question is all broken bones without any flesh, but I wanted to know where people might go with it.
or
?
The question is all broken bones without any flesh, but I wanted to know where people might go with it.
.
I was wondering in small part because I think seeking sympathy from others is sort of associated withdual seeking. Yet on the other hand one of the statements that gets associated with
PoLR sometimes is "I don't care how you feel." And of course it's context dependent because you can't care about your relationships and then at the same time not care about how those people close to you feel.
.
I think, but I would say taking into account how you feel, rather than concerned.
"Language is the Rubicon that divides man from beast."
I think this is a very important and good point. Cheers for posting, Loki.
I agree with everyone's post so far. We've already discussed the demonisation of Fe, and I think that the worst mistake one could make is to attribute a genuine-o-meter to Fe and Fi. Fe and Fi are both genuine. Each has its pros (and cons, to those who devalue it). Fe cares more about people's feelings in general because the emotional content of the environment depends on it. If a Fe type feels ecstatic, it will find a way to make the rest of the room nearly as if not just as ecstatic. Fi, on the other hand, is more concerned with specific individuals' feelings; that is, others' feelings towards the individual, and its feelings towards others. It doesn't place the same emphasis on the external emotional interplay of the metaphorical room. It's interesting that Augusta defines Fi as being relations between "objects", and I'd be grateful to anyone who could confirm what she meant by "objects", and whether it's limited to people/individuals or if it, for example, includes animals ("I know you adore the cat") or natural phenomena ("we love that river so much").
esper, whose descriptions are those?
![]()
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
Oh no, esper. Tell me you didn't.
those appear to be from http://www.personalitypage.com/portraits.html...![]()
![]()
The "ESE" and "SEE" ones have been mixed up
EDIT: For so long I've been looking for a good excuse to post that face on this forum. I feel so relieved now.
ILI (Indescribable Lovemaking Inc.)
5w4 so/sx
"IP temperament! Because today's concerns are tomorrow's indifferences!"
Lord Fnorgle's Domain - A slowly growing collection of music, poetry and literature.
Stickam music performances