With all that Se?Originally Posted by Ezra
And, me an introvert?![]()
![]()
Anyway. I think that the Se tested here is a mixture of Se and sharpness of senses, the latter only related to genetic disposition.
With all that Se?Originally Posted by Ezra
And, me an introvert?![]()
![]()
Anyway. I think that the Se tested here is a mixture of Se and sharpness of senses, the latter only related to genetic disposition.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Hahahaha. Good point. I don't understand how you can think you're ENTj though, or indeed, for that matter, how anyone else can.
I've realised how very different socionics is to MBTI and other theories. You're a clear ESTP in MBTI. Yet when it comes to socionics, the functions just got more complex.
I know, there's no doubt I'm ESTP in mbti; if you notice tho, in mbti terms the ESTP is the happy go lucky one, whereas in socionics ESTp is the commanding and insensitive; the opposite applies to ENTJ and ENTjOriginally Posted by Ezra
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
I see. So that would explain why I was often seen as ESTp by members of the forum. I'm ENTJ in MBTI.
So you think there's a high probability of your being an ENTj?
I would say it has always been a 50 50 for me. Hard to take a decision on a matter which is so far off from real life.Originally Posted by Ezra
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
True. Practicality must be taken into consideration. One can't just base one's type on theoretical situations - it must be applied to the way one's acted in reality.Originally Posted by FDG
Cognitive Process Level of Development (Preference, Skill and Frequency of Use)
extraverted Sensing (Se) ************************* (25.6)
average use
introverted Sensing (Si) ****************************** (30.1)
good use
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) ********************** (22.9)
limited use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) ********************************** (34.7)
good use
extraverted Thinking (Te) **************************** (28.7)
average use
introverted Thinking (Ti) ************************ (24.5)
average use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) **************************************** (40.1)
excellent use
introverted Feeling (Fi) ********************************** (34)
good use
Interesting ...
extraverted Sensing (Se) ********************************************* (45.7)
excellent use
introverted Sensing (Si) ******* (7)
unused
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) ************************ (24.3)
average use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) *********************************************** (47.7)
excellent use
extraverted Thinking (Te) *********************** (23.1)
limited use
introverted Thinking (Ti) **************** (16.1)
limited use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) *************************** (27.6)
average use
introverted Feeling (Fi) ************************************************ (48.9)
excellent use
Further confirmation of my ESFp-dom? LOL
Originally Posted by Ezra
Let us not jump to too many conclusions...Further confirmation of my ESFp-dom? LOL
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
You do realize "Jungian" psychology is not the same thing as Socionics, right?Before you begin...
Thank you for helping us with our research. If you are familiar with Jungian psychology, cognitive science or models of development, we ask you to set aside any ideas you may have
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Cognitive Process Level of Development (Preference, Skill and Frequency of Use)
extraverted Sensing (Se) ************************* (25.5)
average use
introverted Sensing (Si) **************************** (28.5)
average use
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) **************************** (28.8)
average use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) ****************************** (30.3)
good use
extraverted Thinking (Te) ****************************************** (42.8)
excellent use
introverted Thinking (Ti) ***************************************** (41.7)
excellent use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) ***** (5)
unused
introverted Feeling (Fi) ************************************* (37.6)
Summary Analysis of Profile
By focusing on the strongest configuration of cognitive processes, your pattern of responses most closely matches individuals of this type: INTJ
Lead (Dominant) Process
Introverted Intuiting (Ni): Transforming with a meta-perspective. Withdrawing from the world and focusing your mind to receive an insight or realization. Checking if synergy results. Trying out a realization to transform things.
Support (Auxilliary) Process
Extraverted Thinking (Te): Measuring and constructing for progress. Making decisions objectively based on evidence and measures. Checking if things function properly. Applying a procedure to control events and complete goals.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Code:Cognitive Process Level of Development (Preference, Skill and Frequency of Use) extraverted Sensing (Se) ********************* (21.6) limited use introverted Sensing (Si) ******************* (19.7) limited use extraverted Intuiting (Ne) ************************************************ (48.1) excellent use introverted Intuiting (Ni) ******************************************* (43.8) excellent use extraverted Thinking (Te) ********************************* (33.9) good use introverted Thinking (Ti) ********************************************* (45.2) excellent use extraverted Feeling (Fe) ************ (12.6) unused introverted Feeling (Fi) *************** (15.5) unused Summary Analysis of Profile By focusing on the strongest configuration of cognitive processes, your pattern of responses most closely matches individuals of this type: INTP
whenever the dog and i see each other we both stop where we are. we regard each other with a mixture of sadness and suspicion and then we feign indifference.
Jerry, The Zoo Story by Edward Albee
.
so NeTiNi...Te?Originally Posted by reyn_til_runa
the only thing really safe to say is no way are you S nor F![]()
IEE 649 sx/sp cp
Cognitive Process Level of Development (Preference, Skill and Frequency of Use)
extraverted Sensing (Se) ******************************* (31.6)
good use
introverted Sensing (Si) ******************** (20.1)
limited use
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) ************************************************** ** (52.7)
excellent use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) *************** (15.1)
unused
extraverted Thinking (Te) ************************ (24.1)
average use
introverted Thinking (Ti) **************************** (28.7)
average use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) ********************** (22.1)
limited use
introverted Feeling (Fi) ********************************************* (45.6)
excellent use
IEE 649 sx/sp cp
This test always gives me ENFP as a result, or INFP.Cognitive Process Level of Development (Preference, Skill and Frequency of Use)
extraverted Sensing (Se) ************************* (25)
average use
introverted Sensing (Si) ******************* (19.7)
limited use
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) ************************************************ (48.2)
excellent use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) ***************** (17.4)
limited use
extraverted Thinking (Te) *********************************** (35.7)
good use
introverted Thinking (Ti) *************************************** (39)
excellent use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) ****** (6.4)
unused
introverted Feeling (Fi) ************************************************* (49.2)
excellent use
I don't think this test is too good because it equates individualism with Fi and equates empathy, sympathy and outward expressions of emotions with Fe. Also open-mindedness and intellectual creativity make a person a Ne type. IMO.
.
.
extraverted Sensing (Se) ******************** (20.8)
limited use
introverted Sensing (Si) ************************* (25.3)
average use
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) ************************************ (36.8)
excellent use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) **************************************** (40.9)
excellent use
extraverted Thinking (Te) ********************** (22.5)
limited use
introverted Thinking (Ti) ************************************ (37)
excellent use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) ************************* (25.7)
average use
introverted Feeling (Fi) ******************************* (31.6)
good use
Summary Analysis of Profile
By focusing on the strongest configuration of cognitive processes, your pattern of responses most closely matches individuals of this type: INTP
[]
| NP | 3[6w5]8 so/sp | Type thread | My typing of forum members | Johari (Strengths) | Nohari (Weaknesses)
You know what? You're an individual, and that makes people nervous. And it's gonna keep making people nervous for the rest of your life. - Ole Golly from Harriet, the spy.
This test always gives me Fi as highest, then Ne and Se.extraverted Sensing (Se) ************************************ (36.9)
excellent use
introverted Sensing (Si) ************* (13.2)
unused
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) ************************************** (38.7)
excellent use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) ************************* (25.5)
average use
extraverted Thinking (Te) ************************** (26.3)
average use
introverted Thinking (Ti) ***************************** (29.7)
average use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) ************************* (25.4)
average use
introverted Feeling (Fi) ******************************************* (43.9)
excellent use
INTp
sx/sp
extraverted Sensing (Se) ************************** (26.3)
average use
introverted Sensing (Si) *************** (15.9)
unused
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) ********************************** (34.4)
good use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) **************************************** (40.1)
excellent use
extraverted Thinking (Te) *********** (11.6)
unused
introverted Thinking (Ti) ******************************** (32.2)
good use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) ************************************ (36.4)
excellent use
introverted Feeling (Fi) ******************************************* (43.5)
excellent use
extraverted Sensing (Se) ************************************ (36.4)
excellent use
introverted Sensing (Si) ****** (6.6)
unused
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) ************************************************** (50.6)
excellent use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) ********************************* (33.3)
good use
extraverted Thinking (Te) *********************** (23.8)
limited use
introverted Thinking (Ti) **************************** (28.7)
average use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) *********************** (23.1)
limited use
introverted Feeling (Fi) ************************************* (37.3)
excellent use
“I think, therefore I'll think" - Ayn Rand (ESTp, UR GUARDIAN ANGEL)
extraverted Sensing (Se) ***************** (17)
limited use
introverted Sensing (Si) ************************ (24)
limited use
extraverted Intuiting (Ne) ******************************* (31.1)
good use
introverted Intuiting (Ni) *************************************** (39.1)
excellent use
extraverted Thinking (Te) ************************************** (38.2)
excellent use
introverted Thinking (Ti) **************************************** (40)
excellent use
extraverted Feeling (Fe) ************** (14.9)
unused
introverted Feeling (Fi) *********************************** (35.1)
good use
extraverted feeling "unused", how funny that sounds![]()
edit
edit stupid thing
infp results in this test seem to be more aligned with MBTI ...
Look at the logic of it. Socionics is based on Jungian functions. The functions shown to be used most/least in the testing of those are of those who are being tested on. Thus, what you use most determines your type, which is the same as socionics.Originally Posted by UDP III
If this was interpreted in MBTI terms...I suppose the strongest two functions (highest combined total) that make sense type-wise would be Ni + Te = INTJ...but going from strongest function, it would be = INTP.
If it was interpreted in Socionics terms...the type indicated would be ILI from the highest possible combination of the highest scoring functions that make sense type-wise, otherwise, from the strongest function only, the type would be LII.
If the functions were added up to form E\I, N\S, T\F, J\P dichotomies...
E=101.2, I=138.2, therefore = 58% I
S=41, N=70.2, therefore = 63% N
F=50, T=78.2, therefore = 61% T
P=111.2, J=128.2, therefore = 54% J
= INTJ
It is interesting to note that 16.9 could be taken off the Ti score (to give 23.1), and this method of deducing MBTI type in this case would still give INTJ, but there would be a Socionics typing of ILI whether you went by the highest combined total of the two highest scoring functions, or merely went by the highest scoring fucntion.
Test doesn't work, but I filled out this one in hopes that it would work, but it didn't, so I calculated my results manually. I tried to really focus in and answer unbiasedly.
Extroverted Sensing (Se). ************************(12)
Introverted Sensing (Si).. **************************************(19)
Extroverted Intuition (Ne) ************************************************** (25)
Introverted Intuition (Ni).. ******************************************(21)
Extroverted Thinking (Te). **************************************(19)
Introverted Thinking (Ti).. ****************************************(20)
Extroverted Feeling (Fe).. ************************(12)
Introverted Feeling (Fi).... ************************************************** **(26)
Most assuredly INFP. I usually got INFP, but often test as INTP or INXP on the dichotomies.
This test also doubles as a dichotomy test, I suppose.
E 34
I 43
S 31
N 46
T 39
F 38
P/J MBTI
P 41.5
J 35.5
P/J Jungianesque
P 38.5
J 38.5
It didn't work for me either. Here are my scores going by the manual method, where not me is 0 points, little me is 1 point, somewhat me is 2 points, mostly me is 3 points, and exactly me is 4 points.
Se: 9
Ne: 21
Te: 17
Fe: 6
Ni: 13
Si: 14
Ti: 19
Fi: 16
Using dichotomy analysis:
E: 53
I: 62
S: 23
N: 34
T: 36
F: 22
J: 58
P: 57
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP