You act like my ESFp friend online (similar phrasing, constant talking, amazing number of interests on lj). Who knows about real life, though.
entp
esfj
isfp
intj
estp
enfj
infp
istj
esfp
entj
intp
isfj
enfp
estj
istp
infj
You act like my ESFp friend online (similar phrasing, constant talking, amazing number of interests on lj). Who knows about real life, though.
I(N)Tj
Lets talk about Implied and what type she is now.
Edited for gayness.
ENTp
ISFj.
I remember seeing that video of her a while ago, and thinking that she had that "Someone tell me what to do..." look on her face. Plus...look at the title.
This obviously isn't enough info, and I haven't observed her behavior enough to do a real typing; it's just my current inclination.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I haven't seen any reason to change my opinion.
Implied herself has said that she dislikes the idea of being an XNTx and very often, especially when interacting with me, shows a clear dislike for the ENTj way of looking at things and an identification with the ESFp way. She has displayed this quite consistently. Also, her immediate reaction to my comments on ESFps was to suggest that I have a personal problem with them - use of , not . So I really see no case for XNTx.
When asked about whether she was sure of the types of the huge list the gave, she replied "very very very sure".
Maybe I'm reading too much into this but this is so what an ISXj would say, once they have reached a conclusion, a symptom of their hidden agenda. I don't think most strong types would have replied in that way.
The only problem with that is that Implied identified with an ENFp profile. Yet she also said that ENFps annoy her . If she is ISFj that will make sense.
Again I'll say that I have little doubt that she is XSFx. I'm just going to be a bit intuitive and say that I get more a rational than irrational vibe from her, and that I don't think she sounds ESFj.
She likes and admires ESFps but doesn't sound like one of them, and doesn't think she is one herself.
So I still think ISFj it is.
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
That was my guess like 3 weeks ago. Im still listening for further evidence of possibility for everything tho.
I'll go even further and say that implied is ISFj ethical subtype.
But of course I'm also open to further evidence.
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
She is definately esfp after I had a discussion with her.
When she tells stories, she uses descriptions. ISxj or maybe ESFp.
Lol. 11 types have at least one vote. On the other hand none of the extroverted thinking types gained a vote. I guess the main result from this poll is you are NOT any ExTx type.
Let's get these out of the way:
Little/no Se
Little/no Te
Little/No Ne
Most likely an introvert.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
no Ne
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
that's because of role function for esfp
ok Implied, fair enough, but what type then do you think you are? An XNFx?
I can only work with the information I get from you. If you're sure you're not ISFj, fine.
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
I have always been fond of supervisory relationships as we know, yay!
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Told you do.
Good girl.
Now if only everyone would come to terms with the fact that I am ISFj I would be ery pleased.
I'll pick you up at 8:00 in June, implied.
Sycophant can come too, if she's really ISFj.
Hell, even Olga can come.
But you other ISFjs will have to sit in the backseat.
Binary or dichotomous systems, although regulated by a principle, are among the most artificial arrangements that have ever been invented. -- William Swainson, A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals (1835)
I want to pull a Joy, too! I'm ISFj! Yay for duality!
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
Well...you just agreed with Expat...Originally Posted by implied
Yay, then I can still be an ENFp and supervise implied! Yay!Originally Posted by Dynamicism
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
Cone is a pimp!Originally Posted by Cone
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
awwwww
/me dances a special ENFp mating dance for implied and cone and watches events unfold
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
Stay tuned for more flirting!
Binary or dichotomous systems, although regulated by a principle, are among the most artificial arrangements that have ever been invented. -- William Swainson, A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals (1835)
/me thinks Kim uses the chat too much.
On the other hand....
...awwwwww
/me thinks this is entirely true, but witnessing fragile love connections unfold is worth wasting her life away.Originally Posted by Sycophant
They are so ADORABLE!!
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
On the contrary, it means that our duality is at more advanced stages.Originally Posted by implied
Wasn't I the first one to say clearly you were ISFj? And didn't you welcome my input in the end? :wink:
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
Why would you say ISFj?
Binary or dichotomous systems, although regulated by a principle, are among the most artificial arrangements that have ever been invented. -- William Swainson, A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals (1835)
To sum it up - -Originally Posted by Cone
I never bought INTj, not only because she was far too fond, and admiring of, ESFps, although that was the main clue. The "vibe" I got from her when making points was and , seldom . So very early on I thought XSFx was the most likely.
She said she was "very very very" sure of the typings of a huge number of people, which I personally tend to associate with types, more specifically, with the hidden agenda of ISFjs and ISTjs.
I happen to know many examples of all four XSFx types, and I could not see her as ESFj or ISFp. ESFp always remained possible, but Implied herself did not seem to fully identify with them.
Also, she does use far more than ESFps, even as it's clear to me that it's weaker than her , which is very familiar to me since I kno/ew many ISFjs.
Finally, assuming she'd be ISFj, I could see her a split or ethical, but not sensory. And my impression of her fits well with my experience of ISFjs.
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
My type doesn't matter at all in how happy I am in my relationship. Wierdos.
I don't think implied's thinking is well differentiated from her feeling.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, YEAH RIGHT JOY.Originally Posted by Joy
Binary or dichotomous systems, although regulated by a principle, are among the most artificial arrangements that have ever been invented. -- William Swainson, A Treatise on the Geography and Classification of Animals (1835)