But it doesn't describe your type if you are not an INTp. So you seem to be a poor reader of type descriptions. You don't understand them correctly. Which means that what you say here is of no use to the discussion.Originally Posted by Subterranean
Yes
No
I am not LII (I am a retard - I don't even know why I'm answering this poll to be honest)
But it doesn't describe your type if you are not an INTp. So you seem to be a poor reader of type descriptions. You don't understand them correctly. Which means that what you say here is of no use to the discussion.
You and whose army say this? I've been studying such descriptions before you were even born.
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
No, you haven't. And even if you were, you didn't understand anything.
You can't prove otherwise. Besides, most of the descriptions were written by a five year old who drew inspiration from Finnegans Wake by James Joyce. As evidence, look at the descriptions. What other proof do you need? Descriptions can't write themselves.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote